{"title":"Deep learning prediction model based on multi-modal transvaginal ultrasound scan images for endometrial cancer.","authors":"Xingzhe Liu, Yuanjia Wen, Jiahao Liu, Wenzhi Lv, Yuan Wu, Yue Gao, Shaoqing Zeng, Guannan Li, Yu Xia, Shennan Shi, Qiuyang Xu, Xiaofei Jiao, Wenjian Gong, Ding Ma, Guang-Nian Zhao, Yong Fang, Xiaodong Cheng, Xiao-Yan Xu, Dan Liu, Qinglei Gao","doi":"10.1186/s40644-026-01013-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-based deep learning (DL) models for the precise diagnosis of endometrial cancer are insufficient. Our aim is to develop and validate an automatic multi-modal ultrasound DL prediction model for the accurate identification of benign versus malignant endometrial diseases. METHODS: The retrospective dataset of patients with endometrial diseases from two hospitals was segregated into an internal set (n = 696) and an external set (n = 78). All patients underwent grayscale, color Doppler, and 3D reconstructed ultrasound scans. We established ResNet-18 DL models using individual sequences (DLgray, DLCDFI, DL3D) and multi-modal sequences (DLfusion), with comparative performance evaluation through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. We compared the best-performing model with 12 radiologists and assessed the diagnostic performance of radiologists with model assistance. RESULTS: The DLfusion model exhibits precise discrimination capabilities for benign and malignant endometrial diseases, achieving an AUC of 0.92. This performance significantly surpasses that of DLgray (0.78, p < 0.01), DLCDFI (0.79, p = 0.01), and assessments by radiologists (0.64, p < 0.001). The DLfusion model is more accurate than radiologists (0.86 vs. 0.78, p < 0.001) at detecting endometrial cancer. With the assistance of the DLfusion model, the average diagnostic accuracy of twelve radiologists significantly improves from 0.77 to 0.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The DLfusion model based on multi-modal ultrasonic images exhibits a better capacity in diagnosing endometrial cancer compared with radiologists and DL models based on single modal, and significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists, offering valuable support for clinical decision-making. </p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13049860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01013-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-based deep learning (DL) models for the precise diagnosis of endometrial cancer are insufficient. Our aim is to develop and validate an automatic multi-modal ultrasound DL prediction model for the accurate identification of benign versus malignant endometrial diseases. METHODS: The retrospective dataset of patients with endometrial diseases from two hospitals was segregated into an internal set (n = 696) and an external set (n = 78). All patients underwent grayscale, color Doppler, and 3D reconstructed ultrasound scans. We established ResNet-18 DL models using individual sequences (DLgray, DLCDFI, DL3D) and multi-modal sequences (DLfusion), with comparative performance evaluation through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. We compared the best-performing model with 12 radiologists and assessed the diagnostic performance of radiologists with model assistance. RESULTS: The DLfusion model exhibits precise discrimination capabilities for benign and malignant endometrial diseases, achieving an AUC of 0.92. This performance significantly surpasses that of DLgray (0.78, p < 0.01), DLCDFI (0.79, p = 0.01), and assessments by radiologists (0.64, p < 0.001). The DLfusion model is more accurate than radiologists (0.86 vs. 0.78, p < 0.001) at detecting endometrial cancer. With the assistance of the DLfusion model, the average diagnostic accuracy of twelve radiologists significantly improves from 0.77 to 0.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The DLfusion model based on multi-modal ultrasonic images exhibits a better capacity in diagnosing endometrial cancer compared with radiologists and DL models based on single modal, and significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists, offering valuable support for clinical decision-making.
Cancer ImagingONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology.
The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include:
Breast Imaging
Chest
Complications of treatment
Ear, Nose & Throat
Gastrointestinal
Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic
Imaging biomarkers
Interventional
Lymphoma
Measurement of tumour response
Molecular functional imaging
Musculoskeletal
Neuro oncology
Nuclear Medicine
Paediatric.