Deep learning prediction model based on multi-modal transvaginal ultrasound scan images for endometrial cancer.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Xingzhe Liu, Yuanjia Wen, Jiahao Liu, Wenzhi Lv, Yuan Wu, Yue Gao, Shaoqing Zeng, Guannan Li, Yu Xia, Shennan Shi, Qiuyang Xu, Xiaofei Jiao, Wenjian Gong, Ding Ma, Guang-Nian Zhao, Yong Fang, Xiaodong Cheng, Xiao-Yan Xu, Dan Liu, Qinglei Gao
{"title":"Deep learning prediction model based on multi-modal transvaginal ultrasound scan images for endometrial cancer.","authors":"Xingzhe Liu, Yuanjia Wen, Jiahao Liu, Wenzhi Lv, Yuan Wu, Yue Gao, Shaoqing Zeng, Guannan Li, Yu Xia, Shennan Shi, Qiuyang Xu, Xiaofei Jiao, Wenjian Gong, Ding Ma, Guang-Nian Zhao, Yong Fang, Xiaodong Cheng, Xiao-Yan Xu, Dan Liu, Qinglei Gao","doi":"10.1186/s40644-026-01013-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-based deep learning (DL) models for the precise diagnosis of endometrial cancer are insufficient. Our aim is to develop and validate an automatic multi-modal ultrasound DL prediction model for the accurate identification of benign versus malignant endometrial diseases. METHODS: The retrospective dataset of patients with endometrial diseases from two hospitals was segregated into an internal set (n = 696) and an external set (n = 78). All patients underwent grayscale, color Doppler, and 3D reconstructed ultrasound scans. We established ResNet-18 DL models using individual sequences (DLgray, DLCDFI, DL3D) and multi-modal sequences (DLfusion), with comparative performance evaluation through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. We compared the best-performing model with 12 radiologists and assessed the diagnostic performance of radiologists with model assistance. RESULTS: The DLfusion model exhibits precise discrimination capabilities for benign and malignant endometrial diseases, achieving an AUC of 0.92. This performance significantly surpasses that of DLgray (0.78, p < 0.01), DLCDFI (0.79, p = 0.01), and assessments by radiologists (0.64, p < 0.001). The DLfusion model is more accurate than radiologists (0.86 vs. 0.78, p < 0.001) at detecting endometrial cancer. With the assistance of the DLfusion model, the average diagnostic accuracy of twelve radiologists significantly improves from 0.77 to 0.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The DLfusion model based on multi-modal ultrasonic images exhibits a better capacity in diagnosing endometrial cancer compared with radiologists and DL models based on single modal, and significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists, offering valuable support for clinical decision-making. </p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13049860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01013-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-based deep learning (DL) models for the precise diagnosis of endometrial cancer are insufficient. Our aim is to develop and validate an automatic multi-modal ultrasound DL prediction model for the accurate identification of benign versus malignant endometrial diseases. METHODS: The retrospective dataset of patients with endometrial diseases from two hospitals was segregated into an internal set (n = 696) and an external set (n = 78). All patients underwent grayscale, color Doppler, and 3D reconstructed ultrasound scans. We established ResNet-18 DL models using individual sequences (DLgray, DLCDFI, DL3D) and multi-modal sequences (DLfusion), with comparative performance evaluation through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. We compared the best-performing model with 12 radiologists and assessed the diagnostic performance of radiologists with model assistance. RESULTS: The DLfusion model exhibits precise discrimination capabilities for benign and malignant endometrial diseases, achieving an AUC of 0.92. This performance significantly surpasses that of DLgray (0.78, p < 0.01), DLCDFI (0.79, p = 0.01), and assessments by radiologists (0.64, p < 0.001). The DLfusion model is more accurate than radiologists (0.86 vs. 0.78, p < 0.001) at detecting endometrial cancer. With the assistance of the DLfusion model, the average diagnostic accuracy of twelve radiologists significantly improves from 0.77 to 0.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The DLfusion model based on multi-modal ultrasonic images exhibits a better capacity in diagnosing endometrial cancer compared with radiologists and DL models based on single modal, and significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists, offering valuable support for clinical decision-making.

基于多模态阴道超声扫描图像的子宫内膜癌深度学习预测模型。
背景:基于超声的深度学习(DL)模型对子宫内膜癌的精确诊断是不够的。我们的目的是开发和验证一个自动多模态超声DL预测模型,以准确识别良性和恶性子宫内膜疾病。方法:将两家医院的子宫内膜疾病患者的回顾性数据集分为内部组(n = 696)和外部组(n = 78)。所有患者均行灰度、彩色多普勒和三维重建超声扫描。我们使用单个序列(DLgray、DLCDFI、DL3D)和多模态序列(DLfusion)建立了ResNet-18 DL模型,并通过接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分析对其性能进行比较评价。我们将表现最好的模型与12名放射科医生进行了比较,并评估了放射科医生在模型辅助下的诊断表现。结果:DLfusion模型对子宫内膜良恶性疾病具有精确的鉴别能力,AUC为0.92。该性能显著优于DLgray (0.78, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书