Underutilization of Bacteriological Testing in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Single-center Study from Mardin, Türkiye.

IF 0.8 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Barış Çil, Mehmet Sinan Bodur, Mehmet Kabak
{"title":"Underutilization of Bacteriological Testing in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Single-center Study from Mardin, Türkiye.","authors":"Barış Çil, Mehmet Sinan Bodur, Mehmet Kabak","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2025-10-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) poses diagnostic challenges due to the low bacillus burden of the disease and the limited use of bacteriological tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate bacteriological confirmation rates, diagnostic methods, and sampling practices among patients diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in a southeastern province of Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included a total of 456 TB cases diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. The cases were classified as pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), EPTB, and cases with both types of involvement. Bacteriological and histopathological confirmation rates were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41.0% of all cases were classified as EPTB. The most commonly involved site was lymph node TB (22.4%). Bacteriological confirmation rates were significantly lower in EPTB cases: acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear positivity was 3.2% and culture positivity was 4.3%, whereas the histopathological confirmation rate was 88.8%. No bacteriological samples were taken from 63.1% of patients in the EPTB group. Among PTB cases, AFB smear positivity (71.4%) and culture positivity (66.5%) were significantly higher (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that bacteriological tests are both underused and of low diagnostic efficiency in EPTB cases. Most diagnoses are based on histopathology rather than on bacteriological confirmation. Strengthening sampling strategies and promoting the use of rapid molecular testing are critical for enhancing bacteriological validation in EPTB.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"109-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13002247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2025-10-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) poses diagnostic challenges due to the low bacillus burden of the disease and the limited use of bacteriological tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate bacteriological confirmation rates, diagnostic methods, and sampling practices among patients diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in a southeastern province of Türkiye.

Material and methods: This retrospective study included a total of 456 TB cases diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. The cases were classified as pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), EPTB, and cases with both types of involvement. Bacteriological and histopathological confirmation rates were compared between the groups.

Results: 41.0% of all cases were classified as EPTB. The most commonly involved site was lymph node TB (22.4%). Bacteriological confirmation rates were significantly lower in EPTB cases: acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear positivity was 3.2% and culture positivity was 4.3%, whereas the histopathological confirmation rate was 88.8%. No bacteriological samples were taken from 63.1% of patients in the EPTB group. Among PTB cases, AFB smear positivity (71.4%) and culture positivity (66.5%) were significantly higher (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that bacteriological tests are both underused and of low diagnostic efficiency in EPTB cases. Most diagnoses are based on histopathology rather than on bacteriological confirmation. Strengthening sampling strategies and promoting the use of rapid molecular testing are critical for enhancing bacteriological validation in EPTB.

细菌学检测在肺外结核中的应用不足:来自Mardin, rkiye的一项回顾性单中心研究。
目的:肺外结核(EPTB)由于病原菌负担低,细菌学检查的使用有限,给诊断带来了挑战。本研究的目的是评估东南部 rkiye省诊断为结核病(TB)的患者的细菌学确认率、诊断方法和抽样做法。材料和方法:本回顾性研究共纳入2014年至2019年诊断的456例结核病病例。这些病例分为肺结核(PTB)、EPTB和两种类型的病例。比较两组间的细菌学和组织病理学确证率。结果:41.0%的病例为EPTB。最常见的受累部位为淋巴结结核(22.4%)。EPTB病例细菌学确认率明显较低:抗酸杆菌(AFB)涂片阳性3.2%,培养阳性4.3%,而组织病理学确认率为88.8%。EPTB组中63.1%的患者未采集细菌学样本。肺结核患者AFB涂片阳性(71.4%)和培养阳性(66.5%)显著高于肺结核患者(P < 0.001)。结论:细菌学检查在EPTB病例中的应用不足,诊断效率较低。大多数诊断是基于组织病理学而不是细菌学证实。加强采样策略和促进快速分子检测的使用对于加强EPTB的细菌学验证至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书