Development of the Health Humanities Competence Scale for Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professional Students.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Hsiang-Chu Pai
{"title":"Development of the Health Humanities Competence Scale for Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professional Students.","authors":"Hsiang-Chu Pai","doi":"10.1111/scs.70212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare professionals often require a greater awareness of health and humanities than others. However, a Health Humanities Competence Scale (HHCS) for medical university healthcare professional students (HPS) has not been established yet.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to provide original, reliable, and valid measures for a HHCS for HPS that reflects the humanistic abilities of multidisciplinary healthcare professional students towards themselves, their families, and their professional relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational design was adopted in this study. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to extract the factors of health humanities competence, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to confirm reliability and validity, through a model fit assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA identified three factors in the HHCS for HPS: self, family, and profession-related health and humanities, which explained 24.78%, 21.98%, and 18.67% of the variance, respectively. The final 19-item instrument with the three factors explained 65.44% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.92. Additionally, CFA identified a second-order factor, HHCS for HPS. Overall, the goodness-of-fit indices indicated a satisfactory fit of the entire model (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.31, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.069, Comparative Fit Index = 0.94, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.93). Additionally, the HHCS for HPS scores were significantly and positively correlated with the empathy subscale scores of the Communication Effectiveness Profile (r = 0.63, p < 0.01). Therefore, the results reveal that the HHCS for HPS demonstrates strong convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The original three factors (19 items) demonstrated support for use by university healthcare students. A larger sample could strengthen the reliability and validity of the scale. However, the three-factor model is a useful measurement tool for assessing the demonstration of health humanities competencies by healthcare professional students.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"40 1","pages":"e70212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12946591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare professionals often require a greater awareness of health and humanities than others. However, a Health Humanities Competence Scale (HHCS) for medical university healthcare professional students (HPS) has not been established yet.

Aim: This study aims to provide original, reliable, and valid measures for a HHCS for HPS that reflects the humanistic abilities of multidisciplinary healthcare professional students towards themselves, their families, and their professional relationships.

Methods: An observational design was adopted in this study. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to extract the factors of health humanities competence, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to confirm reliability and validity, through a model fit assessment.

Results: PCA identified three factors in the HHCS for HPS: self, family, and profession-related health and humanities, which explained 24.78%, 21.98%, and 18.67% of the variance, respectively. The final 19-item instrument with the three factors explained 65.44% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.92. Additionally, CFA identified a second-order factor, HHCS for HPS. Overall, the goodness-of-fit indices indicated a satisfactory fit of the entire model (χ2/df = 1.31, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.069, Comparative Fit Index = 0.94, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.93). Additionally, the HHCS for HPS scores were significantly and positively correlated with the empathy subscale scores of the Communication Effectiveness Profile (r = 0.63, p < 0.01). Therefore, the results reveal that the HHCS for HPS demonstrates strong convergent validity.

Conclusion: The original three factors (19 items) demonstrated support for use by university healthcare students. A larger sample could strengthen the reliability and validity of the scale. However, the three-factor model is a useful measurement tool for assessing the demonstration of health humanities competencies by healthcare professional students.

多学科卫生专业学生健康人文能力量表的编制。
背景:医疗保健专业人员通常需要比其他人更强的健康和人文意识。然而,目前尚未编制出适用于医科大学卫生专业学生的健康人文能力量表。目的:本研究旨在为反映多学科卫生保健专业学生对自己、家庭和专业关系的人文能力的hhs量表提供原始、可靠、有效的测量方法。方法:本研究采用观察设计。采用主成分分析(PCA)提取健康人文能力的影响因素,并通过模型拟合评估进行验证性因子分析(CFA)来确认信度和效度。结果:主成分分析(PCA)鉴定出3个影响HPS的因素:自我、家庭和职业相关健康与人文,分别解释了24.78%、21.98%和18.67%的方差。最后的19项仪器与三个因素解释65.44%的总方差。Cronbach’s alpha值为0.92。此外,CFA鉴定了HPS的二级因子HHCS。总体而言,拟合优度指标表明整个模型的拟合令人满意(χ2/df = 1.31,近似均方根误差= 0.069,比较拟合指数= 0.94,Tucker-Lewis指数= 0.93)。HPS得分与共情分量表得分呈显著正相关(r = 0.63, p)。结论:原3个因素(19项)支持医学生使用共情分量表。更大的样本可以增强量表的信度和效度。然而,三因素模型是一个有用的测量工具,以评估卫生保健专业学生的健康人文能力的展示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书