{"title":"Development of the Health Humanities Competence Scale for Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professional Students.","authors":"Hsiang-Chu Pai","doi":"10.1111/scs.70212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare professionals often require a greater awareness of health and humanities than others. However, a Health Humanities Competence Scale (HHCS) for medical university healthcare professional students (HPS) has not been established yet.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to provide original, reliable, and valid measures for a HHCS for HPS that reflects the humanistic abilities of multidisciplinary healthcare professional students towards themselves, their families, and their professional relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational design was adopted in this study. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to extract the factors of health humanities competence, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to confirm reliability and validity, through a model fit assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA identified three factors in the HHCS for HPS: self, family, and profession-related health and humanities, which explained 24.78%, 21.98%, and 18.67% of the variance, respectively. The final 19-item instrument with the three factors explained 65.44% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.92. Additionally, CFA identified a second-order factor, HHCS for HPS. Overall, the goodness-of-fit indices indicated a satisfactory fit of the entire model (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.31, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.069, Comparative Fit Index = 0.94, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.93). Additionally, the HHCS for HPS scores were significantly and positively correlated with the empathy subscale scores of the Communication Effectiveness Profile (r = 0.63, p < 0.01). Therefore, the results reveal that the HHCS for HPS demonstrates strong convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The original three factors (19 items) demonstrated support for use by university healthcare students. A larger sample could strengthen the reliability and validity of the scale. However, the three-factor model is a useful measurement tool for assessing the demonstration of health humanities competencies by healthcare professional students.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"40 1","pages":"e70212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12946591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Healthcare professionals often require a greater awareness of health and humanities than others. However, a Health Humanities Competence Scale (HHCS) for medical university healthcare professional students (HPS) has not been established yet.
Aim: This study aims to provide original, reliable, and valid measures for a HHCS for HPS that reflects the humanistic abilities of multidisciplinary healthcare professional students towards themselves, their families, and their professional relationships.
Methods: An observational design was adopted in this study. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to extract the factors of health humanities competence, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to confirm reliability and validity, through a model fit assessment.
Results: PCA identified three factors in the HHCS for HPS: self, family, and profession-related health and humanities, which explained 24.78%, 21.98%, and 18.67% of the variance, respectively. The final 19-item instrument with the three factors explained 65.44% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.92. Additionally, CFA identified a second-order factor, HHCS for HPS. Overall, the goodness-of-fit indices indicated a satisfactory fit of the entire model (χ2/df = 1.31, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.069, Comparative Fit Index = 0.94, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.93). Additionally, the HHCS for HPS scores were significantly and positively correlated with the empathy subscale scores of the Communication Effectiveness Profile (r = 0.63, p < 0.01). Therefore, the results reveal that the HHCS for HPS demonstrates strong convergent validity.
Conclusion: The original three factors (19 items) demonstrated support for use by university healthcare students. A larger sample could strengthen the reliability and validity of the scale. However, the three-factor model is a useful measurement tool for assessing the demonstration of health humanities competencies by healthcare professional students.
期刊介绍:
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.