Comparative evaluation of physical methods for extracting leaf trichomes.

IF 5.2 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Satinderpal Kaur, Devi Balakrishnan, Rupesh Kariyat
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of physical methods for extracting leaf trichomes.","authors":"Satinderpal Kaur, Devi Balakrishnan, Rupesh Kariyat","doi":"10.1186/s13007-026-01512-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trichomes are hairlike protuberances in plants that deter herbivores using both physical and chemical means, with pre- and post-ingestive effects. In addition, trichomes also serve as a protective layer, reducing transpiration loss, thereby improving abiotic stress tolerance. A common method for assessing the role of trichomes in defense is to extract and infuse trichomes into the artificial diet, and then examine the feeding, growth, and developmental parameters of herbivores. Although methods such as brushing, using dry ice, and shaving with a razor, have been commonly used, there is no consensus on the best and most efficient method for trichome extraction. In the current study, to optimize the ideal method to extract trichomes, we tested three common methods with some modifications, such as flash freezing and brushing, shaving using a scalpel, and vortexing followed by freezing. Here, we used representative species from both eudicots and monocots with significant trichome diversity. For eudicots, we selected three cultivated plant species: tomato, sunflower, and Mexican squash, and two wild plant species: wild sunflower and wild squash, and for monocots, we used the model plant, rice. The efficiency of each method was examined using a combination of light and scanning electron microscopy. The results suggest that freezing followed by brushing is the most efficient and ideal method for extracting trichomes and can be recommended for eudicots. However, none of the evaluated methods were effective for the monocot rice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20100,"journal":{"name":"Plant Methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13041295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-026-01512-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trichomes are hairlike protuberances in plants that deter herbivores using both physical and chemical means, with pre- and post-ingestive effects. In addition, trichomes also serve as a protective layer, reducing transpiration loss, thereby improving abiotic stress tolerance. A common method for assessing the role of trichomes in defense is to extract and infuse trichomes into the artificial diet, and then examine the feeding, growth, and developmental parameters of herbivores. Although methods such as brushing, using dry ice, and shaving with a razor, have been commonly used, there is no consensus on the best and most efficient method for trichome extraction. In the current study, to optimize the ideal method to extract trichomes, we tested three common methods with some modifications, such as flash freezing and brushing, shaving using a scalpel, and vortexing followed by freezing. Here, we used representative species from both eudicots and monocots with significant trichome diversity. For eudicots, we selected three cultivated plant species: tomato, sunflower, and Mexican squash, and two wild plant species: wild sunflower and wild squash, and for monocots, we used the model plant, rice. The efficiency of each method was examined using a combination of light and scanning electron microscopy. The results suggest that freezing followed by brushing is the most efficient and ideal method for extracting trichomes and can be recommended for eudicots. However, none of the evaluated methods were effective for the monocot rice.

叶毛提取物理方法的比较评价。
毛状体是植物中的毛发状突起,通过物理和化学手段,在进食前和进食后起到阻止食草动物的作用。此外,毛状体还起到保护层的作用,减少蒸腾损失,从而提高非生物抗逆性。评估毛状体在防御中的作用的一种常用方法是提取毛状体并注入人工饲料中,然后检查草食动物的摄食、生长和发育参数。虽然刷牙、使用干冰和用剃刀剃须等方法已被广泛使用,但对于提取毛状体的最佳和最有效方法尚无共识。在本研究中,为了优化提取毛状体的理想方法,我们对三种常用的提取方法进行了测试,并对其进行了一些修改,即快速冷冻和刷毛、手术刀剃须和涡旋后冷冻。在这里,我们使用了具有显著毛状体多样性的双子房和单子房的代表性物种。对于菊科植物,我们选择了三种栽培植物:番茄、向日葵和墨西哥南瓜,以及两种野生植物:野生向日葵和野生南瓜,对于单子叶植物,我们选择了模式植物——水稻。每种方法的效率都是用光学和扫描电子显微镜相结合的方法来检验的。结果表明,冷冻后刷牙是提取毛状体最有效、最理想的方法,可推荐用于诊断患者。然而,这些方法对单株水稻都不有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Methods
Plant Methods 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.90%
发文量
121
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Plant Methods is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal for the plant research community that encompasses all aspects of technological innovation in the plant sciences. There is no doubt that we have entered an exciting new era in plant biology. The completion of the Arabidopsis genome sequence, and the rapid progress being made in other plant genomics projects are providing unparalleled opportunities for progress in all areas of plant science. Nevertheless, enormous challenges lie ahead if we are to understand the function of every gene in the genome, and how the individual parts work together to make the whole organism. Achieving these goals will require an unprecedented collaborative effort, combining high-throughput, system-wide technologies with more focused approaches that integrate traditional disciplines such as cell biology, biochemistry and molecular genetics. Technological innovation is probably the most important catalyst for progress in any scientific discipline. Plant Methods’ goal is to stimulate the development and adoption of new and improved techniques and research tools and, where appropriate, to promote consistency of methodologies for better integration of data from different laboratories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书