Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia Compared to Sleep Health Education in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Insomnia: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.
Camilla M Hoyos, Nicole Espinosa, Nathaniel S Marshall, Haley M LaMonica, Christopher J Gordon, Simon D Kyle, Ronald R Grunstein, Sharon L Naismith
{"title":"Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia Compared to Sleep Health Education in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Insomnia: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Camilla M Hoyos, Nicole Espinosa, Nathaniel S Marshall, Haley M LaMonica, Christopher J Gordon, Simon D Kyle, Ronald R Grunstein, Sharon L Naismith","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While symptoms of insomnia are common in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and predict future cognitive decline, a robust evidence base for treating insomnia in MCI is lacking. This study investigated the feasibility of recruiting and delivering a digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I) in this group. In a parallel open-label randomised-controlled feasibility trial, participants were recruited and screened via the internet and assessed for MCI using videoconference methods. Eligible participants were randomised to dCBT-I (Sleepio, 6 weekly sessions) or control (3 online modules of sleep health education) over a 12-week period. Inclusion criteria included adults aged ≥ 50 years, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) > 10, and clinical criteria of MCI on a neuropsychological battery. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants who met screening and randomisation criteria, and their recruitment pathway (clinic vs. online). A secondary outcome was the effect size of the difference in ISI between groups at week 12. Recruitment occurred March-August 2023 (dCBT-I = 19; control = 21; 30 females; mean [SD] age = 59.7 years [7.3]; ISI = 17.0 [3.7]). 37% of participants issued a pre-screening number (n = 246) were eligible to attend online screening. 47% of those issued a screening number (n = 90) were eligible to be randomised (n = 42), with 2 not proceeding (final n = 40). dCBT-I improved 12 weeks ISI compared to control (Cohen's d [95% CI] -1.6 [-2.4 to -0.8]). 79% of participants completed ≥ 4 sessions. This population can be recruited through online pathways and follow the protocol as well as adhere to the intervention of this remotely conducted trial. Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry: (NCT05568381 registered 03/10/2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While symptoms of insomnia are common in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and predict future cognitive decline, a robust evidence base for treating insomnia in MCI is lacking. This study investigated the feasibility of recruiting and delivering a digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I) in this group. In a parallel open-label randomised-controlled feasibility trial, participants were recruited and screened via the internet and assessed for MCI using videoconference methods. Eligible participants were randomised to dCBT-I (Sleepio, 6 weekly sessions) or control (3 online modules of sleep health education) over a 12-week period. Inclusion criteria included adults aged ≥ 50 years, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) > 10, and clinical criteria of MCI on a neuropsychological battery. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants who met screening and randomisation criteria, and their recruitment pathway (clinic vs. online). A secondary outcome was the effect size of the difference in ISI between groups at week 12. Recruitment occurred March-August 2023 (dCBT-I = 19; control = 21; 30 females; mean [SD] age = 59.7 years [7.3]; ISI = 17.0 [3.7]). 37% of participants issued a pre-screening number (n = 246) were eligible to attend online screening. 47% of those issued a screening number (n = 90) were eligible to be randomised (n = 42), with 2 not proceeding (final n = 40). dCBT-I improved 12 weeks ISI compared to control (Cohen's d [95% CI] -1.6 [-2.4 to -0.8]). 79% of participants completed ≥ 4 sessions. This population can be recruited through online pathways and follow the protocol as well as adhere to the intervention of this remotely conducted trial. Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry: (NCT05568381 registered 03/10/2022).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.