Predicting mental health-related sick leave using stress check data: development and validation of a workplace risk model.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shunsuke Inoue, Tomohisa Nagata, Naoto Ito, Yuka Takahashi, Yusuke Hoshi, Mika Sato, Masahide Minami, Masayoshi Ida, Koji Mori
{"title":"Predicting mental health-related sick leave using stress check data: development and validation of a workplace risk model.","authors":"Shunsuke Inoue, Tomohisa Nagata, Naoto Ito, Yuka Takahashi, Yusuke Hoshi, Mika Sato, Masahide Minami, Masayoshi Ida, Koji Mori","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiag011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a predictive model for mental health-related sick leave using data from Japan's Stress Check program linked with personnel records (demographics and sick-leave history), and to evaluate its predictive performance compared with the conventional high-stress classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of employees (2020-2024) in a 14-company corporate group spanning diverse occupations. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was developed using data from 2020-2023, with company and year as random intercepts. Variable robustness was confirmed through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. Model calibration and discrimination were evaluated using the Brier score and area under the curve (AUC), respectively. The model was temporally validated on 2024 data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 87 138 person-years in the development phase, 695 employees took mental health-related sick leave (0.8%). Seven predictors-younger age, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, low job control, poor job suitability, and low coworker support-were significantly associated with sick leave. The recalibrated model showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.708) and calibration (Brier score = 0.0079) in development, and higher performance in validation (AUC = 0.819; Brier score = 0.0026). The conventional high-stress classification performed poorly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed model demonstrated robust predictive validity and outperformed the conventional high-stress classification. By providing quantitative and continuous risk stratification within the Stress Check framework, it offers a practical approach to support risk-based prioritization and decision-making in occupational health practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13125752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiag011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a predictive model for mental health-related sick leave using data from Japan's Stress Check program linked with personnel records (demographics and sick-leave history), and to evaluate its predictive performance compared with the conventional high-stress classification.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of employees (2020-2024) in a 14-company corporate group spanning diverse occupations. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was developed using data from 2020-2023, with company and year as random intercepts. Variable robustness was confirmed through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. Model calibration and discrimination were evaluated using the Brier score and area under the curve (AUC), respectively. The model was temporally validated on 2024 data.

Results: Among 87 138 person-years in the development phase, 695 employees took mental health-related sick leave (0.8%). Seven predictors-younger age, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, low job control, poor job suitability, and low coworker support-were significantly associated with sick leave. The recalibrated model showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.708) and calibration (Brier score = 0.0079) in development, and higher performance in validation (AUC = 0.819; Brier score = 0.0026). The conventional high-stress classification performed poorly.

Conclusions: The proposed model demonstrated robust predictive validity and outperformed the conventional high-stress classification. By providing quantitative and continuous risk stratification within the Stress Check framework, it offers a practical approach to support risk-based prioritization and decision-making in occupational health practice.

使用压力检查数据预测与心理健康相关的病假:工作场所风险模型的开发和验证。
目的:利用与人事记录(人口统计数据和病假历史)相关的日本压力检查计划的数据,开发并验证一个与精神健康相关的病假预测模型,并与传统的高压力分类相比,评估其预测性能。方法:我们对一家14家公司的员工(2020-2024)进行了回顾性队列研究。使用2020-2023年的数据,以公司和年份作为随机截距,建立了混合效应logistic回归模型。通过LASSO逻辑回归验证变量稳健性。采用Brier评分和曲线下面积(AUC)分别评价模型的定标和判别。该模型在2024年的数据上进行了暂时验证。结果:在开发阶段的87 138人年中,有695名员工请了心理健康病假(0.8%)。7个预测因素——年轻、焦虑、抑郁、睡眠障碍、工作控制力低、工作适应性差和同事支持度低——与病假显著相关。重新校准后的模型在开发过程中具有良好的判别性(AUC = 0.708)和校准性(Brier评分= 0.0079),在验证过程中具有较高的性能(AUC = 0.819; Brier评分= 0.0026)。传统的高应力分类效果不佳。结论:该模型具有较强的预测有效性,优于传统的高应力分类。通过在压力检查框架内提供定量和持续的风险分层,它提供了一种实用的方法来支持职业健康实践中基于风险的优先排序和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书