{"title":"Effects of squat training with different ranges of motion on muscle strength, jump performance, and change of direction ability.","authors":"Takamichi Inoguchi, Hiroki Homma, Yukina Mochizuki, Ayumu Kozuma, Minoru Deguchi, Takuto Naito, Mika Kamiya-Saito, Naoki Kikuchi","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.17438-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effects of short-term, high-load full squat (F-SQ) and half squat (H-SQ) training on muscle strength, jump performance, and change of direction in resistance-trained athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty resistance-trained males (aged 19.4±0.8 years; height 170.6±6.0 cm; body mass 70.4±6.4 kg) were allocated to three groups: F-SQ, H-SQ, and control. The F-SQ and H-SQ groups performed squat training twice weekly for 3 weeks, with intensity progressively increasing from 85% to 90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). Post-intervention, participants underwent 1RM, pro-agility, and vertical jump tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The H-SQ group exhibited significantly higher training volume (P=0.001), while the F-SQ group achieved greater concentric work volume (P=0.005) and lifting velocity (P=0.017-0.048). A significant interaction was observed for F-SQ 1RM (P=0.025), with both the F-SQ (P=0.032) and H-SQ (P=0.024) groups showing significant improvements. No significant interaction was found in the pro-agility test (P=0.225), although a significant main effect of time was noted (P=0.001). The H-SQ group demonstrated slightly larger effect sizes (ES=0.50[95%CI: -0.94, 0.91]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although training volume and quality differed between protocols, both F-SQ and H-SQ training yielded comparable improvements in muscle strength and performance, with no significant between-group differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":"66 3","pages":"371-379"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.17438-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to examine the effects of short-term, high-load full squat (F-SQ) and half squat (H-SQ) training on muscle strength, jump performance, and change of direction in resistance-trained athletes.
Methods: Thirty resistance-trained males (aged 19.4±0.8 years; height 170.6±6.0 cm; body mass 70.4±6.4 kg) were allocated to three groups: F-SQ, H-SQ, and control. The F-SQ and H-SQ groups performed squat training twice weekly for 3 weeks, with intensity progressively increasing from 85% to 90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). Post-intervention, participants underwent 1RM, pro-agility, and vertical jump tests.
Results: The H-SQ group exhibited significantly higher training volume (P=0.001), while the F-SQ group achieved greater concentric work volume (P=0.005) and lifting velocity (P=0.017-0.048). A significant interaction was observed for F-SQ 1RM (P=0.025), with both the F-SQ (P=0.032) and H-SQ (P=0.024) groups showing significant improvements. No significant interaction was found in the pro-agility test (P=0.225), although a significant main effect of time was noted (P=0.001). The H-SQ group demonstrated slightly larger effect sizes (ES=0.50[95%CI: -0.94, 0.91]).
Conclusions: Although training volume and quality differed between protocols, both F-SQ and H-SQ training yielded comparable improvements in muscle strength and performance, with no significant between-group differences.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.