Helping caregivers of older adults with cancer manage patient care: A qualitative analysis of healthcare professional perspectives

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of geriatric oncology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102921
Ying Wang , Maya Anand , Kah Poh Loh , AnnaLynn M. Williams , Sally A. Norton , Christopher L. Seplaki
{"title":"Helping caregivers of older adults with cancer manage patient care: A qualitative analysis of healthcare professional perspectives","authors":"Ying Wang ,&nbsp;Maya Anand ,&nbsp;Kah Poh Loh ,&nbsp;AnnaLynn M. Williams ,&nbsp;Sally A. Norton ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Seplaki","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Family and/or unpaid caregivers play an important role in managing care for older adults with cancer (aged ≥65 years). Despite the development of theoretical models that emphasize the need for medical teams to assess caregiver abilities and integrate this assessment into patient care plans, little is known about what specific caregiver abilities should be prioritized for assessment and how such assessments should be conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In this interpretive description qualitative study, we conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) who are involved in caring for older adults with cancer. All participants were recruited from a single large academic medical center between June and September 2024. The interviews focused on: (1) the caregiver abilities of interest to HCPs, (2) how HCPs assess these abilities, and (3) how HCPs respond to caregiver-reported deficits in these abilities. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Two analysts analyzed the transcripts using inductive thematic analysis and open coding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We interviewed 19 HCPs from diverse specialties (mean age: 45 ± 1.7 years, 90% female, 90% White). HCPs expressed interest in various caregiver abilities, including physical or functional capacity, cognitive function, medical knowledge and skills, emotional ability to cope with cancer diagnosis, financial ability (e.g., accessing medications), and availability. HCPs reported assessing caregiver abilities based on interactions with caregivers or using informal direct questions. They also reported several challenges in this assessment such as time limitations in clinical settings and ambiguity regarding their responsibility in evaluating caregiver abilities. When responding to deficits in caregivers' abilities, HCPs usually encourage caregivers to seek available social support or connect them with relevant resources. If caregivers need to develop specific caregiving skills, HCPs use more deliberate methods (e.g., a teach-back approach) to evaluate their abilities and provide direct support, including helping simplify caregiving tasks, providing necessary supplies or equipment, and offering various learning methods.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>We did not identify a systematic approach among HCPs to assessing these abilities. Given HCP-reported challenges in this assessment, our study highlights the need for a formal caregiver ability assessment to identify caregiver challenges and inform patient care plan development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 102921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406826000755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Family and/or unpaid caregivers play an important role in managing care for older adults with cancer (aged ≥65 years). Despite the development of theoretical models that emphasize the need for medical teams to assess caregiver abilities and integrate this assessment into patient care plans, little is known about what specific caregiver abilities should be prioritized for assessment and how such assessments should be conducted.

Materials and methods

In this interpretive description qualitative study, we conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) who are involved in caring for older adults with cancer. All participants were recruited from a single large academic medical center between June and September 2024. The interviews focused on: (1) the caregiver abilities of interest to HCPs, (2) how HCPs assess these abilities, and (3) how HCPs respond to caregiver-reported deficits in these abilities. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Two analysts analyzed the transcripts using inductive thematic analysis and open coding.

Results

We interviewed 19 HCPs from diverse specialties (mean age: 45 ± 1.7 years, 90% female, 90% White). HCPs expressed interest in various caregiver abilities, including physical or functional capacity, cognitive function, medical knowledge and skills, emotional ability to cope with cancer diagnosis, financial ability (e.g., accessing medications), and availability. HCPs reported assessing caregiver abilities based on interactions with caregivers or using informal direct questions. They also reported several challenges in this assessment such as time limitations in clinical settings and ambiguity regarding their responsibility in evaluating caregiver abilities. When responding to deficits in caregivers' abilities, HCPs usually encourage caregivers to seek available social support or connect them with relevant resources. If caregivers need to develop specific caregiving skills, HCPs use more deliberate methods (e.g., a teach-back approach) to evaluate their abilities and provide direct support, including helping simplify caregiving tasks, providing necessary supplies or equipment, and offering various learning methods.

Discussion

We did not identify a systematic approach among HCPs to assessing these abilities. Given HCP-reported challenges in this assessment, our study highlights the need for a formal caregiver ability assessment to identify caregiver challenges and inform patient care plan development.
帮助老年癌症护理人员管理患者护理:医疗保健专业观点的定性分析。
简介:家庭和/或无偿照顾者在管理老年癌症患者(≥65岁)的护理中发挥着重要作用。尽管理论模型的发展强调医疗团队需要评估护理人员的能力,并将这种评估纳入患者护理计划,但对于哪些具体的护理人员能力应该优先评估,以及如何进行评估,我们知之甚少。材料和方法:在本解释性描述定性研究中,我们对参与照顾老年癌症患者的医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)进行了个人半结构化访谈。所有参与者都是在2024年6月至9月期间从一个大型学术医疗中心招募的。访谈的重点是:(1)医护人员感兴趣的照顾者能力,(2)医护人员如何评估这些能力,以及(3)医护人员如何回应照顾者报告的这些能力缺陷。所有采访都有录音和文字记录。两位分析人员采用归纳主题分析和开放编码的方法对抄本进行了分析。结果:我们采访了来自不同专业的19名HCPs(平均年龄:45±1.7岁,90%为女性,90%为白人)。HCPs表达了对各种护理人员能力的兴趣,包括身体或功能能力、认知功能、医学知识和技能、应对癌症诊断的情感能力、经济能力(例如获得药物)和可用性。HCPs报告了基于与照顾者的互动或使用非正式的直接问题来评估照顾者的能力。他们还报告了该评估中的几个挑战,例如临床设置的时间限制以及评估护理人员能力时责任的模糊性。在应对照顾者能力缺陷时,医护人员通常鼓励照顾者寻求可用的社会支持或将他们与相关资源联系起来。如果照护者需要发展特定的照护技能,医护人员会使用更深思熟虑的方法(例如,反教方法)来评估他们的能力并提供直接支持,包括帮助简化照护任务,提供必要的用品或设备,以及提供各种学习方法。讨论:我们没有在医护人员中确定评估这些能力的系统方法。考虑到hcp在本评估中报告的挑战,我们的研究强调需要进行正式的护理人员能力评估,以确定护理人员面临的挑战,并为患者护理计划的制定提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书