The effect of bioactive membrane in alveolar ridge preservation: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of periodontology Pub Date : 2026-09-11 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1002/jper.70094
Magdalena Orlowska, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Ann Decker, Junying Li, Alice Ou, Nataly Zambrana, Paolo Nava, Fernanda A. da Costa Deller, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"The effect of bioactive membrane in alveolar ridge preservation: A double-blind randomized clinical trial","authors":"Magdalena Orlowska,&nbsp;Muhammad H. A. Saleh,&nbsp;Ann Decker,&nbsp;Junying Li,&nbsp;Alice Ou,&nbsp;Nataly Zambrana,&nbsp;Paolo Nava,&nbsp;Fernanda A. da Costa Deller,&nbsp;Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.1002/jper.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with or without a biologically active amnion–chorion membrane (BACM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty patients requiring tooth extraction in the esthetic zone were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent tooth extraction and collagenated bovine bone grafting, while the test sites received an additional BACM. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans (IOS) were performed before extraction and at 4 months post-extraction. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed. The primary endpoint was the change in vertical and horizontal hard and soft tissue dimensions as measured by CBCT and clinically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All patients completed implant placement. CBCT measurements at 2 mm demonstrated that control and test groups exhibited reductions in horizontal ridge width with median decreases of 1.19 mm and 2.41 mm, respectively, with no significant differences (<i>p</i> = 0.126). For vertical height changes, the control and test groups experienced mean reductions of 0.99 ± 1.08 mm and 1.33 ± 0.73 mm, respectively, with no significant differences (<i>p</i> = 0.250). IOS analyses showed that mean soft tissue thickness at the alveolar crest was 2.67 ± 0.699 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.370) in the control versus 2.13 ± 0.807 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.846) in the test group, with no significant differences (<i>p</i> = 0.325).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The addition of a BACM did not improve the mean horizontal or vertical bone dimentional changes or have a measurable effect on the soft tissue outcome during ARP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"97 9","pages":"1871-1884"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jper.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jper.70094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with or without a biologically active amnion–chorion membrane (BACM).

Methods

Thirty patients requiring tooth extraction in the esthetic zone were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent tooth extraction and collagenated bovine bone grafting, while the test sites received an additional BACM. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans (IOS) were performed before extraction and at 4 months post-extraction. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed. The primary endpoint was the change in vertical and horizontal hard and soft tissue dimensions as measured by CBCT and clinically.

Results

All patients completed implant placement. CBCT measurements at 2 mm demonstrated that control and test groups exhibited reductions in horizontal ridge width with median decreases of 1.19 mm and 2.41 mm, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.126). For vertical height changes, the control and test groups experienced mean reductions of 0.99 ± 1.08 mm and 1.33 ± 0.73 mm, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.250). IOS analyses showed that mean soft tissue thickness at the alveolar crest was 2.67 ± 0.699 mm (p = 0.370) in the control versus 2.13 ± 0.807 mm (p = 0.846) in the test group, with no significant differences (p = 0.325).

Conclusion

The addition of a BACM did not improve the mean horizontal or vertical bone dimentional changes or have a measurable effect on the soft tissue outcome during ARP.

生物活性膜在牙槽嵴保存中的作用:一项双盲随机临床试验。
背景:本随机对照试验旨在评估有无生物活性羊膜-绒毛膜(BACM)的肺泡嵴保存(ARP)。方法:将30例需要在美观区拔牙的患者随机分为两组。两组均进行拔牙和牛骨移植,同时在试验部位进行额外的BACM。拔牙前和拔牙后4个月分别行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和口内扫描(IOS)。评估患者报告的预后(PROs)。主要终点是CBCT和临床测量的垂直和水平硬软组织尺寸的变化。结果:所有患者均完成种植。2 mm的CBCT测量显示,对照组和试验组水平脊宽分别减少1.19 mm和2.41 mm,无显著差异(p = 0.126)。对于垂直高度变化,对照组和试验组平均分别减少0.99±1.08 mm和1.33±0.73 mm,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.250)。IOS分析显示,对照组的平均牙槽嵴软组织厚度为2.67±0.699 mm (p = 0.370),而试验组的平均牙槽嵴软组织厚度为2.13±0.807 mm (p = 0.846),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.325)。结论:在ARP过程中,添加BACM并没有改善平均水平或垂直骨尺寸变化,也没有对软组织结果产生可测量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书