Fall-Related Medications and Fall Risk as Predictors of Fall-Related Hospitalization Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of gerontological nursing Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.3928/00989134-20260219-02
Tamara Alibrahim, Yvonne Johnston
{"title":"Fall-Related Medications and Fall Risk as Predictors of Fall-Related Hospitalization Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.","authors":"Tamara Alibrahim, Yvonne Johnston","doi":"10.3928/00989134-20260219-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine fall-related medications and fall risk as predictors of fall-related hospitalizations among a cohort of community-dwelling older adults in the southern tier of New York State.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants comprised 8,499 patients from 14 primary care practices within a large community hospital system. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine associations between fall-related medications and fall risk, and their interactions as predictors of fall-related hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant association between fall risk and Fall Risk Medication Score (FRMS) with a cut-point ≥6 (χ<sup>2</sup> = 85.145, <i>p</i> < .001), with a weak but significant positive correlation (φ = 0.100, <i>p</i> < .001). Older adults who had fall risk were 1.738 times more likely to have a FRMS ≥6 (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.544, 1.956]). Similarly, there was a statistically significant association between fall risk and FRMS with a cut-point ≥10 (χ<sup>2</sup> = 68.953, <i>p</i> < .001), with a weak but significant positive correlation (φ = 0.090, <i>p</i> < .001). Older adults who had fall risk were 2.348 times more likely to have a FRMS ≥10 (95% CI [1.909, 2.887]). In logistic regression analyses, the interaction between fall risk and FRMS was a significant predictor of hospitalization when controlling for age and sex (<i>p</i> < .001); however, FRMS did not significantly improve the model over fall risk alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current tools for assessing and weighing the personal, environmental, and pharmacological factors that influence the likelihood of falls among older adults could be significantly improved through larger cohort studies using significant endpoints, such as fall-related hospitalizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gerontological nursing","volume":" ","pages":"22-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gerontological nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20260219-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine fall-related medications and fall risk as predictors of fall-related hospitalizations among a cohort of community-dwelling older adults in the southern tier of New York State.

Method: Participants comprised 8,499 patients from 14 primary care practices within a large community hospital system. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine associations between fall-related medications and fall risk, and their interactions as predictors of fall-related hospitalizations.

Results: There was a statistically significant association between fall risk and Fall Risk Medication Score (FRMS) with a cut-point ≥6 (χ2 = 85.145, p < .001), with a weak but significant positive correlation (φ = 0.100, p < .001). Older adults who had fall risk were 1.738 times more likely to have a FRMS ≥6 (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.544, 1.956]). Similarly, there was a statistically significant association between fall risk and FRMS with a cut-point ≥10 (χ2 = 68.953, p < .001), with a weak but significant positive correlation (φ = 0.090, p < .001). Older adults who had fall risk were 2.348 times more likely to have a FRMS ≥10 (95% CI [1.909, 2.887]). In logistic regression analyses, the interaction between fall risk and FRMS was a significant predictor of hospitalization when controlling for age and sex (p < .001); however, FRMS did not significantly improve the model over fall risk alone.

Conclusion: Current tools for assessing and weighing the personal, environmental, and pharmacological factors that influence the likelihood of falls among older adults could be significantly improved through larger cohort studies using significant endpoints, such as fall-related hospitalizations.

在社区居住的老年人中,跌倒相关药物和跌倒风险作为跌倒相关住院的预测因子。
目的:在纽约州南部一组社区居住的老年人中,研究跌倒相关药物和跌倒风险作为跌倒相关住院治疗的预测因素。方法:参与者包括来自大型社区医院系统内14个初级保健实践的8499名患者。进行了双变量和多变量分析,以检查跌倒相关药物与跌倒风险之间的关联,以及它们作为跌倒相关住院的预测因子的相互作用。结果:跌倒风险与跌倒风险用药评分(FRMS)有统计学意义,且cut point≥6 (χ2 = 85.145, p < .001),呈微弱但显著的正相关(φ = 0.100, p < .001)。有跌倒风险的老年人FRMS≥6的可能性为1.738倍(95%可信区间[CI][1.544, 1.956])。同样,当cut point≥10时,跌倒风险与FRMS之间也有统计学意义(χ2 = 68.953, p < .001),呈微弱但显著的正相关(φ = 0.090, p < .001)。有跌倒风险的老年人FRMS≥10的可能性是其2.348倍(95% CI[1.909, 2.887])。在logistic回归分析中,在控制年龄和性别的情况下,跌倒风险和FRMS之间的相互作用是住院的显著预测因子(p < 0.001);然而,FRMS并没有显著改善跌落风险模型。结论:目前用于评估和衡量影响老年人跌倒可能性的个人、环境和药理学因素的工具可以通过使用重要终点(如跌倒相关住院)的更大规模队列研究得到显著改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontological Nursing is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing clinically relevant original articles on the practice of gerontological nursing across the continuum of care in a variety of health care settings, for more than 40 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书