Laura Murphy, Gemma Morcombe, Divya Subramaniam, Madeleine Walker, Rob Waller, Michelle Franklin, Marissa Joseph, Amy Tinetti
{"title":"What is the Journey to Physiotherapy Care for Women over 60 Years with Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Scoping Review.","authors":"Laura Murphy, Gemma Morcombe, Divya Subramaniam, Madeleine Walker, Rob Waller, Michelle Franklin, Marissa Joseph, Amy Tinetti","doi":"10.1007/s00192-026-06544-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) impacts 20% of adult women with prevalence increasing with age. Physiotherapy is considered first-line care and can greatly improve quality of life for those experiencing symptoms. However, few women over 60 seek professional help. Little is known regarding how this population receives care for their PFD, including if, and when, they are referred to physiotherapy. The aim of this study is to review the current literature on the journey of women over 60 years with PFD to accessing physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of electronic databases was completed to inform the scoping review. Articles were included if they were in English and analysed the journey to physiotherapy for women 60 years or over with PFD. Analysis of the studies were completed by reviewers and organised into key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Four themes were identified: the General Practitioner (GP) as gatekeepers to pelvic care, timely initiation of physiotherapy care, bias towards passive care for women over 60 with PFD and lack of awareness around the benefits of physiotherapy for PFD in women over 60.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the limited literature found on this topic it is difficult to draw conclusions about the current pathway to physiotherapy for women over 60 years with PFD. However, the available literature suggests this population is less likely to be referred to physiotherapy and more likely to be prescribed passive care, which differs from international guideline recommendations and younger age groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2743-2753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13649927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06544-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) impacts 20% of adult women with prevalence increasing with age. Physiotherapy is considered first-line care and can greatly improve quality of life for those experiencing symptoms. However, few women over 60 seek professional help. Little is known regarding how this population receives care for their PFD, including if, and when, they are referred to physiotherapy. The aim of this study is to review the current literature on the journey of women over 60 years with PFD to accessing physiotherapy.
Methods: A search of electronic databases was completed to inform the scoping review. Articles were included if they were in English and analysed the journey to physiotherapy for women 60 years or over with PFD. Analysis of the studies were completed by reviewers and organised into key themes.
Results: Four articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Four themes were identified: the General Practitioner (GP) as gatekeepers to pelvic care, timely initiation of physiotherapy care, bias towards passive care for women over 60 with PFD and lack of awareness around the benefits of physiotherapy for PFD in women over 60.
Conclusions: Given the limited literature found on this topic it is difficult to draw conclusions about the current pathway to physiotherapy for women over 60 years with PFD. However, the available literature suggests this population is less likely to be referred to physiotherapy and more likely to be prescribed passive care, which differs from international guideline recommendations and younger age groups.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion