{"title":"Prognostic comparison between osteoblastic and osteolytic metastases in prostate cancer.","authors":"Akihiro Ono, Kazuki Akiyama, Ryohei Nishimoto, Ryo Amakawa, Yasushi Inoue, Tadashi Yoshimatsu, Yoshiyuki Shiga, Masashi Kusakabe, Haruyasu Yamada, Satoru Taguchi, Haruki Kume, Masaki Nakamura","doi":"10.35772/ghm.2025.01131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over 80% of patients develop bone metastases in the advanced stages of prostate cancer, resulting in a poor prognosis. To date, no study has explored the relationship between the type of bone metastasis and patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical features and prognoses of patients with osteoblastic and osteolytic bone metastases. Among the 63 patients diagnosed with bone metastases from prostate cancer at our institution between May 2011 and September 2023, 51 were classified as having osteoblastic metastases and 12 as having osteolytic metastases based on imaging findings. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and differences between groups were assessed using the log-rank test. Clinical parameters were compared using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors. No significant differences were observed between the osteoblastic and osteolytic groups in terms of clinical or laboratory parameters, except for a higher platelet count in the osteoblastic group (<i>p</i> = 0.0181). The five-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the osteoblastic group than in the osteolytic group (49.5% <i>vs.</i> 30.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.0437), with median survival times of 59 months and 38.5 months, respectively. In both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, the type of bone metastasis was the only factor significantly associated with increased hazard ratios. Patients with osteolytic bone metastases from prostate cancer have a markedly lower five-year overall survival than those with osteoblastic metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12556,"journal":{"name":"Global health & medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12932056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35772/ghm.2025.01131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over 80% of patients develop bone metastases in the advanced stages of prostate cancer, resulting in a poor prognosis. To date, no study has explored the relationship between the type of bone metastasis and patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical features and prognoses of patients with osteoblastic and osteolytic bone metastases. Among the 63 patients diagnosed with bone metastases from prostate cancer at our institution between May 2011 and September 2023, 51 were classified as having osteoblastic metastases and 12 as having osteolytic metastases based on imaging findings. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and differences between groups were assessed using the log-rank test. Clinical parameters were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors. No significant differences were observed between the osteoblastic and osteolytic groups in terms of clinical or laboratory parameters, except for a higher platelet count in the osteoblastic group (p = 0.0181). The five-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the osteoblastic group than in the osteolytic group (49.5% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.0437), with median survival times of 59 months and 38.5 months, respectively. In both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, the type of bone metastasis was the only factor significantly associated with increased hazard ratios. Patients with osteolytic bone metastases from prostate cancer have a markedly lower five-year overall survival than those with osteoblastic metastases.
超过80%的患者在前列腺癌晚期发生骨转移,导致预后不良。到目前为止,还没有研究探讨骨转移类型与患者预后之间的关系。本研究的目的是比较成骨细胞和溶骨转移患者的临床特征和预后。在我院2011年5月至2023年9月诊断为前列腺癌骨转移的63例患者中,根据影像学表现,51例为成骨细胞转移,12例为溶骨转移。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析总生存率,采用log-rank检验评估组间差异。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较临床参数。进行单因素和多因素Cox比例风险分析以确定预后因素。除成骨细胞组血小板计数较高(p = 0.0181)外,成骨细胞组和溶骨组在临床或实验室参数方面无显著差异。成骨组的5年总生存率明显高于溶骨组(49.5% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.0437),中位生存时间分别为59个月和38.5个月。在单因素和多因素Cox分析中,骨转移类型是唯一与风险比增加显著相关的因素。前列腺癌溶骨转移患者的5年总生存率明显低于成骨细胞转移患者。