Association of alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transferase, total bilirubin, and bile acid levels with HCC risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ying Cao, You Deng, Hong Zhao, Ligai Liu, Wen Xie
{"title":"Association of alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transferase, total bilirubin, and bile acid levels with HCC risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ying Cao, You Deng, Hong Zhao, Ligai Liu, Wen Xie","doi":"10.1186/s40001-026-04093-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholestasis-related parameters are indicators of liver inflammation and damage, which contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the association between key cholestasis-related parameters and the risk of new-onset HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 15, 2024, for eligible studies investigating the association between alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), bile acids (BA), and total bilirubin (TB) and incident HCC. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Random-effects model was used to pooled the estimates, and sensitivity analysis was conducted using fixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 4053 entries, 155 studies were included (3,808,988 individuals). After confounder adjustment, elevated ALP (hazard ratios [HR] = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-3.75), GGT (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 2.15-3.08), and TB (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.36-2.61) were associated with increased risks of new-onset HCC, consistent with sensitivity analysis using fixed effects models. The multivariable analyses of ALP, GGT, and TB as continuous variables showed no associations with the risk of HCC. In multivariable analyses using the most commonly employed cutoffs, GGT > 50 U/L (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.55-4.06) and TB > 1.2 mg/dL (HR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.67-5.20) were independently associated with incident HCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that elevated ALP, GGT, and TB might be associated with new-onset HCC, emphasizing the importance of monitoring these cholestasis-related parameters in clinical practice. BA could not be analyzed due to the small number of studies and the differences in reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04093-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cholestasis-related parameters are indicators of liver inflammation and damage, which contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the association between key cholestasis-related parameters and the risk of new-onset HCC.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 15, 2024, for eligible studies investigating the association between alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), bile acids (BA), and total bilirubin (TB) and incident HCC. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Random-effects model was used to pooled the estimates, and sensitivity analysis was conducted using fixed-effects models.

Results: From 4053 entries, 155 studies were included (3,808,988 individuals). After confounder adjustment, elevated ALP (hazard ratios [HR] = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-3.75), GGT (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 2.15-3.08), and TB (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.36-2.61) were associated with increased risks of new-onset HCC, consistent with sensitivity analysis using fixed effects models. The multivariable analyses of ALP, GGT, and TB as continuous variables showed no associations with the risk of HCC. In multivariable analyses using the most commonly employed cutoffs, GGT > 50 U/L (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.55-4.06) and TB > 1.2 mg/dL (HR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.67-5.20) were independently associated with incident HCC.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that elevated ALP, GGT, and TB might be associated with new-onset HCC, emphasizing the importance of monitoring these cholestasis-related parameters in clinical practice. BA could not be analyzed due to the small number of studies and the differences in reporting.

碱性磷酸酶、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、总胆红素和胆汁酸水平与HCC风险的关联:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:胆汁淤积相关参数是肝脏炎症和损伤的指标,是肝细胞癌(HCC)发展的重要因素。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析探讨了胆汁淤积相关关键参数与新发HCC风险之间的关系。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane Library数据库,从数据库建立到2024年7月15日,检索碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)、胆汁酸(BA)和总胆红素(TB)与HCC发生率之间关系的符合条件的研究。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型汇总估计,采用固定效应模型进行敏感性分析。结果:从4053个条目中,纳入155项研究(3,808,988人)。混杂校正后,ALP升高(风险比[HR] = 2.49, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.66-3.75)、GGT升高(HR = 2.57, 95% CI 2.15-3.08)和TB升高(HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.36-2.61)与新发HCC风险增加相关,与使用固定效应模型的敏感性分析一致。ALP、GGT和TB作为连续变量的多变量分析显示与HCC的风险无关。在使用最常用截断值的多变量分析中,GGT > 50 U/L (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.55-4.06)和TB > 1.2 mg/dL (HR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.67-5.20)与HCC的发生独立相关。结论:本荟萃分析提示ALP、GGT和TB升高可能与新发HCC相关,强调了在临床实践中监测这些胆汁淤积相关参数的重要性。由于研究数量少,报告差异大,BA无法进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书