Comparative analysis of the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging kinetic heterogeneity and apparent diffusion coefficient for grading invasive breast cancer.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.4274/dir.2026.263831
Xinyu Feng, Peiwei Ye, Hui Chen, Changyu Liu, Qingqiang Zhu
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging kinetic heterogeneity and apparent diffusion coefficient for grading invasive breast cancer.","authors":"Xinyu Feng, Peiwei Ye, Hui Chen, Changyu Liu, Qingqiang Zhu","doi":"10.4274/dir.2026.263831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantitatively compare the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) kinetic heterogeneity and conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the extent of breast cancer infiltration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a retrospective analysis of DCE-MRI data of patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC) diagnosed by pathology in our hospital between January 2023 and February 2025. The aim was to obtain quantitative measures of kinetic heterogeneity and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) from DWI, and to extract the six main parameters for lesion heterogeneity analysis from preoperative MRI data using MATLAB, SPM12, and R 4.4.1. The parameters included peak, enhancement volume, persistent fraction, plateau, washout, and heterogeneity. The diagnostic efficacy of DCE-MRI, conventional DWI, and their combination on the extent of IBC infiltration was compared by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivities, specificities, and correlations among the parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high-grade group exhibited significantly higher peak, plateau, washout, and heterogeneity values, along with lower persistent and ADC values, compared with the low-grade group (all <i>P</i> < 0.001); tumor volume did not differ between groups (<i>P</i> = 0.314). ADC and persistent fractions were negatively correlated with pathological grade, whereas peak, plateau, washout, and heterogeneity were positively correlated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that heterogeneity achieved a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) than ADC [0.910, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.857-0.948 vs. 0.808, 95% CI: 0.741-0.863; DeLong Z = 2.626, <i>P</i> = 0.009]. The AUC for the combined model of heterogeneity, peak value, and ADC was 0.969 (95% CI: 0.946-0.992), with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 89.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCE-MRI combined with DWI has significant diagnostic value in identifying the extent of IBC infiltration.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>DCE-MRI kinetic heterogeneity combined with DWI enables noninvasive discrimination of the extent of IBC infiltration before surgery, facilitating personalized systemic therapy and nodal evaluation while avoiding overtreatment in patients at low risk. Computer-aided, whole-tumor heterogeneity analysis replaces limited region-of-interest sampling, significantly improving both efficiency and accuracy of IBC grading. Integration of kinetic heterogeneity plus diffusion parameters provides a panoramic view of tumor size, location, and perilesional relationships, empowering multi-disciplinary teams to rapidly individualize surgical and adjuvant treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":"399-408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13320300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2026.263831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To quantitatively compare the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) kinetic heterogeneity and conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the extent of breast cancer infiltration.

Methods: This study employed a retrospective analysis of DCE-MRI data of patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC) diagnosed by pathology in our hospital between January 2023 and February 2025. The aim was to obtain quantitative measures of kinetic heterogeneity and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) from DWI, and to extract the six main parameters for lesion heterogeneity analysis from preoperative MRI data using MATLAB, SPM12, and R 4.4.1. The parameters included peak, enhancement volume, persistent fraction, plateau, washout, and heterogeneity. The diagnostic efficacy of DCE-MRI, conventional DWI, and their combination on the extent of IBC infiltration was compared by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivities, specificities, and correlations among the parameters.

Results: The high-grade group exhibited significantly higher peak, plateau, washout, and heterogeneity values, along with lower persistent and ADC values, compared with the low-grade group (all P < 0.001); tumor volume did not differ between groups (P = 0.314). ADC and persistent fractions were negatively correlated with pathological grade, whereas peak, plateau, washout, and heterogeneity were positively correlated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that heterogeneity achieved a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) than ADC [0.910, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.857-0.948 vs. 0.808, 95% CI: 0.741-0.863; DeLong Z = 2.626, P = 0.009]. The AUC for the combined model of heterogeneity, peak value, and ADC was 0.969 (95% CI: 0.946-0.992), with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 89.2%.

Conclusion: DCE-MRI combined with DWI has significant diagnostic value in identifying the extent of IBC infiltration.

Clinical significance: DCE-MRI kinetic heterogeneity combined with DWI enables noninvasive discrimination of the extent of IBC infiltration before surgery, facilitating personalized systemic therapy and nodal evaluation while avoiding overtreatment in patients at low risk. Computer-aided, whole-tumor heterogeneity analysis replaces limited region-of-interest sampling, significantly improving both efficiency and accuracy of IBC grading. Integration of kinetic heterogeneity plus diffusion parameters provides a panoramic view of tumor size, location, and perilesional relationships, empowering multi-disciplinary teams to rapidly individualize surgical and adjuvant treatment strategies.

磁共振动态增强成像动力学异质性与表观扩散系数对浸润性乳腺癌分级诊断价值的比较分析。
目的:定量比较动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像(MRI)动力学异质性与常规弥散加权成像(DWI)对乳腺癌浸润程度的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析我院2023年1月至2025年2月经病理诊断的浸润性乳腺癌(IBC)患者的DCE-MRI资料。通过MATLAB、SPM12和r4.4.1软件,从术前MRI数据中提取病变异质性分析的6个主要参数,获得DWI的动力学非均质性和表观扩散系数(adc)的定量指标。参数包括峰值、增强体积、持续分数、平台、洗脱和异质性。通过分析受者工作特征曲线、敏感性、特异性及各参数间的相关性,比较DCE-MRI与常规DWI及其联合对IBC浸润程度的诊断效果。结果:与低分级组相比,高分级组表现出更高的峰值、平台期、洗脱期和异质性值,以及更低的持续性和ADC值(均P < 0.001);各组间肿瘤体积差异无统计学意义(P = 0.314)。ADC和持久分数与病理分级呈负相关,而峰值、平台、洗脱期和异质性呈正相关。受试者工作特征分析显示,异质性获得的曲线下面积(AUC)显著高于ADC[0.910, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.857-0.948比0.808,95% CI: 0.741-0.863;DeLong Z = 2.626, P = 0.009]。异质性、峰值和ADC联合模型的AUC为0.969 (95% CI: 0.946 ~ 0.992),敏感性为95.5%,特异性为89.2%。结论:DCE-MRI联合DWI对判断IBC浸润程度有重要的诊断价值。临床意义:DCE-MRI动力学异质性联合DWI可在手术前无创辨别IBC浸润程度,便于个体化全身治疗和淋巴结评估,同时避免低危患者过度治疗。计算机辅助的全肿瘤异质性分析取代了有限的兴趣区域采样,显著提高了IBC分级的效率和准确性。动力学异质性和扩散参数的整合提供了肿瘤大小、位置和病灶周围关系的全景视图,使多学科团队能够快速个性化手术和辅助治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书