Classifying Psychedelic-Related Complications.

Q3 Neuroscience
Tomislav Majić, Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, Ricarda Evens
{"title":"Classifying Psychedelic-Related Complications.","authors":"Tomislav Majić, Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, Ricarda Evens","doi":"10.1007/7854_2026_614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Classic psychedelics such as psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and 5-methoxy-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) have shown promising effects in the treatment of certain mental health conditions. Enthusiastic claims about their therapeutic potential have led to overly optimistic reactions in the media and the public, subsequently resulting in increased use outside of clinical contexts and a heightened rate of psychedelic-related complications. As psychedelics exhibit low toxicity and hardly any habit-forming potential, the typical risks and harms of these substances are often overlooked by mental health professionals and under-assessed in psychedelic research. Similar to the medical history of other psychoactive substances introduced as medicines such as opioids, cocaine, and benzodiazepines, awareness for psychedelic-related complications has emerged with delay. Psychedelics are characterized by a wide range of acute effects on the human psyche and by a particular temporal dynamic in which these effects unfold, including acute, subacute, and long-term effects. Knowledge of how psychedelic effects unfold is not only essential for their use in therapy but also for the understanding and management of risks and complications.Here we provide an overview of complications that may be associated with the use of classic psychedelics, drawing on historical and current classification approaches and using the typical temporal dynamics of drug effects as a guiding thread. We will also discuss to what extent psychedelic-related disorders can be causally and specifically attributed to psychedelic use. Finally, considerations regarding the placement of psychedelic-related disorders within nosological-diagnostic classification systems will be discussed. The increasing interest in using psychedelics within the framework of psychotherapy and the rise of non-medical use underscore the need for a more nuanced classification of psychedelic-related risks and harms. The suggested classification can be used as a comprehensive starting point for the assessment of psychedelic-related complications, contributing to maximizing benefits and minimizing risks of these substances in research, therapy, and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":11257,"journal":{"name":"Current topics in behavioral neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"127-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current topics in behavioral neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2026_614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classic psychedelics such as psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and 5-methoxy-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) have shown promising effects in the treatment of certain mental health conditions. Enthusiastic claims about their therapeutic potential have led to overly optimistic reactions in the media and the public, subsequently resulting in increased use outside of clinical contexts and a heightened rate of psychedelic-related complications. As psychedelics exhibit low toxicity and hardly any habit-forming potential, the typical risks and harms of these substances are often overlooked by mental health professionals and under-assessed in psychedelic research. Similar to the medical history of other psychoactive substances introduced as medicines such as opioids, cocaine, and benzodiazepines, awareness for psychedelic-related complications has emerged with delay. Psychedelics are characterized by a wide range of acute effects on the human psyche and by a particular temporal dynamic in which these effects unfold, including acute, subacute, and long-term effects. Knowledge of how psychedelic effects unfold is not only essential for their use in therapy but also for the understanding and management of risks and complications.Here we provide an overview of complications that may be associated with the use of classic psychedelics, drawing on historical and current classification approaches and using the typical temporal dynamics of drug effects as a guiding thread. We will also discuss to what extent psychedelic-related disorders can be causally and specifically attributed to psychedelic use. Finally, considerations regarding the placement of psychedelic-related disorders within nosological-diagnostic classification systems will be discussed. The increasing interest in using psychedelics within the framework of psychotherapy and the rise of non-medical use underscore the need for a more nuanced classification of psychedelic-related risks and harms. The suggested classification can be used as a comprehensive starting point for the assessment of psychedelic-related complications, contributing to maximizing benefits and minimizing risks of these substances in research, therapy, and beyond.

致幻剂相关并发症分类。
经典的迷幻药,如裸盖菇素、麦角酸二乙胺(LSD)和5-甲氧基-二甲基色胺(5-MeO-DMT),在治疗某些精神健康状况方面显示出有希望的效果。对其治疗潜力的热情宣传导致了媒体和公众的过度乐观反应,随后导致临床以外的使用增加,致幻剂相关并发症的发生率升高。由于致幻剂具有低毒性和几乎没有任何形成习惯的潜力,这些物质的典型风险和危害往往被精神卫生专业人员所忽视,在致幻剂研究中也经常被低估。与阿片类药物、可卡因和苯二氮卓类药物等作为药物引入的其他精神活性物质的病史类似,对致幻剂相关并发症的认识出现较晚。致幻剂的特点是对人类心理有广泛的急性影响,并且这些影响在特定的时间动态中展开,包括急性、亚急性和长期影响。了解致幻剂的作用是如何展开的,不仅对其在治疗中的应用至关重要,而且对风险和并发症的理解和管理也至关重要。在这里,我们概述了可能与使用经典致幻剂有关的并发症,借鉴了历史和当前的分类方法,并使用药物作用的典型时间动态作为指导线索。我们还将讨论致幻剂相关的疾病在多大程度上可以归因于致幻剂的使用。最后,将讨论致幻剂相关疾病在疾病诊断分类系统中的位置。在心理治疗框架内使用致幻剂的兴趣日益增加,非医疗使用的增加强调了对致幻剂相关风险和危害进行更细致分类的必要性。建议的分类可以作为评估致幻剂相关并发症的综合起点,有助于这些物质在研究,治疗等方面的利益最大化和风险最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书