Comparative efficacy of a local drug delivery system using Blue®M gel and Gengigel® as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients.

IF 4.3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Aiysha Nudrath, Rupa Rani Bodduru, Ramanarayana Boyapati, Shahbaz Hassan, Sushmita Hari, Archita Vadla
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of a local drug delivery system using Blue®M gel and Gengigel® as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients.","authors":"Aiysha Nudrath, Rupa Rani Bodduru, Ramanarayana Boyapati, Shahbaz Hassan, Sushmita Hari, Archita Vadla","doi":"10.17219/dmp/187885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periodontal disease is a condition that impacts the tissues surrounding the teeth, sparked by the build-up of bacteria leading to inflammation. These bacteria form biofilms, shielding themselves from antimicrobial treatment. Typically, mechanical cleaning disrupts these biofilms and lowers bacterial levels. However, in some cases, it might not fully address the disease due to intricate root structures and irregular lesion shapes. Local drug delivery directly to the affected area serves as a reservoir for drugs, potentially altering harmful bacteria and aiding in the healing process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various local drug delivery systems, specifically Blue®M gel along with scaling and root planing (SRP), Gengigel® with SRP, and SRP alone, in managing patients with chronic periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study population comprised 36 patients of both sexes in the age group of 35-60 years, with supra-bony pockets of 4-6 mm in any quadrant. The participants were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the treatment provided: group A - SRP alone; group B - SRP with BlueM gel; and group C - SRP with Gengigel. The gels were applied into the pockets. The follow-up period was 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a study involving 36 patients, predominantly males, with an average age of 42.03 years, Gengigel demonstrated a slightly greater reduction in the probing pocket depth (PPD) (-0.16 ±0.04 mm), the oral hygiene index (OHI) (-0.45 ±0.81) and the plaque index (PI) (-0.51 ±0.33) as compared to the other 2 groups. BlueM gel exhibited a superior reduction in the clinical attachment level (CAL) when compared to the control and Gengigel groups (-0.35 ±0.31 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both BlueM Gel and Gengigel have proven to be dependable choices or adjuncts to SRP. However, additional studies are needed to further explore their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"63 1","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/187885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periodontal disease is a condition that impacts the tissues surrounding the teeth, sparked by the build-up of bacteria leading to inflammation. These bacteria form biofilms, shielding themselves from antimicrobial treatment. Typically, mechanical cleaning disrupts these biofilms and lowers bacterial levels. However, in some cases, it might not fully address the disease due to intricate root structures and irregular lesion shapes. Local drug delivery directly to the affected area serves as a reservoir for drugs, potentially altering harmful bacteria and aiding in the healing process.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various local drug delivery systems, specifically Blue®M gel along with scaling and root planing (SRP), Gengigel® with SRP, and SRP alone, in managing patients with chronic periodontitis.

Material and methods: The study population comprised 36 patients of both sexes in the age group of 35-60 years, with supra-bony pockets of 4-6 mm in any quadrant. The participants were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the treatment provided: group A - SRP alone; group B - SRP with BlueM gel; and group C - SRP with Gengigel. The gels were applied into the pockets. The follow-up period was 6 months.

Results: In a study involving 36 patients, predominantly males, with an average age of 42.03 years, Gengigel demonstrated a slightly greater reduction in the probing pocket depth (PPD) (-0.16 ±0.04 mm), the oral hygiene index (OHI) (-0.45 ±0.81) and the plaque index (PI) (-0.51 ±0.33) as compared to the other 2 groups. BlueM gel exhibited a superior reduction in the clinical attachment level (CAL) when compared to the control and Gengigel groups (-0.35 ±0.31 mm).

Conclusions: Both BlueM Gel and Gengigel have proven to be dependable choices or adjuncts to SRP. However, additional studies are needed to further explore their effectiveness.

Blue®M凝胶和Gengigel®局部给药系统作为慢性牙周炎患者刮治和牙根刨除辅助的比较疗效
背景:牙周病是一种影响牙齿周围组织的疾病,由细菌积聚引起炎症。这些细菌形成生物膜,保护自己免受抗菌药物的治疗。通常,机械清洁会破坏这些生物膜,降低细菌水平。然而,在某些情况下,由于复杂的根结构和不规则的病变形状,它可能不能完全解决疾病。直接将局部药物输送到受影响的区域可以作为药物的储存库,潜在地改变有害细菌并帮助愈合过程。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较不同局部给药系统在治疗慢性牙周炎患者中的有效性,特别是Blue®M凝胶联合刮治和牙根规划(SRP)、Gengigel®联合SRP和单独SRP。材料与方法:研究人群为年龄在35-60岁的男女患者36例,任一象限骨上袋4-6 mm。根据所提供的治疗方法随机分为3组:A组-单用SRP;B组- SRP加BlueM凝胶;C组为Gengigel SRP。凝胶被涂在口袋里。随访6个月。结果:在一项涉及36例患者的研究中,以男性为主,平均年龄42.03岁,与其他两组相比,Gengigel在探测袋深度(PPD)(-0.16±0.04 mm),口腔卫生指数(OHI)(-0.45±0.81)和斑块指数(PI)(-0.51±0.33)方面表现出略大的降低。与对照组和Gengigel组(-0.35±0.31 mm)相比,BlueM凝胶在临床附着水平(CAL)方面表现出优越的降低。结论:BlueM凝胶和Gengigel已被证明是可靠的选择或辅助SRP。然而,需要进一步的研究来进一步探索其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书