Is metamorphopsia more important than visual acuity in vitreomacular interface disorders? A scoping review.

IF 2.7 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Armin Moroder, Gerard McGowan, David Yorston
{"title":"Is metamorphopsia more important than visual acuity in vitreomacular interface disorders? A scoping review.","authors":"Armin Moroder, Gerard McGowan, David Yorston","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitreomacular interface disorders are known to reduce vision-related quality of life (VR-QoL). This is due to both reduced visual acuity and metamorphopsia. In clinical practice, visual acuity is measured routinely, but quantitative measurements of metamorphopsia are less frequent. We conducted a scoping literature review to determine whether metamorphopsia or visual acuity has the greatest effect on VR-QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review, of studies published in English, and indexed in Medline or Embase, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. 65 studies were identified. 55 were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 10 publications, six studied epiretinal membrane, two studied full-thickness macular hole, one studied vitreomacular traction with or without macular hole and one included both macular hole and epiretinal membrane. A variety of different methods were used to measure metamorphopsia and VR-QoL. Of the eight studies reporting the association between preoperative metamorphopsia and VR-QoL, five found a significant correlation. Six studies examined the association between post-operative metamorphopsia and VR-QoL, five of which found a significant correlation. Five studies looked for any link between reduction in metamorphopsia and improvement in VR-QoL. All five found a significant association. In contrast, only two of eight studies found any association between preoperative vision and VR-QoL, and none found any relationship between improvement in visual acuity and improvement in VR-QoL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the published evidence is limited, it appears that metamorphopsia may be a better predictor of preoperative and postoperative VR-QoL than visual acuity. Further research is necessary to confirm this, but metamorphopsia should be measured when assessing vitreomacular interface disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vitreomacular interface disorders are known to reduce vision-related quality of life (VR-QoL). This is due to both reduced visual acuity and metamorphopsia. In clinical practice, visual acuity is measured routinely, but quantitative measurements of metamorphopsia are less frequent. We conducted a scoping literature review to determine whether metamorphopsia or visual acuity has the greatest effect on VR-QoL.

Methods: A literature review, of studies published in English, and indexed in Medline or Embase, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. 65 studies were identified. 55 were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria.

Results: Of the 10 publications, six studied epiretinal membrane, two studied full-thickness macular hole, one studied vitreomacular traction with or without macular hole and one included both macular hole and epiretinal membrane. A variety of different methods were used to measure metamorphopsia and VR-QoL. Of the eight studies reporting the association between preoperative metamorphopsia and VR-QoL, five found a significant correlation. Six studies examined the association between post-operative metamorphopsia and VR-QoL, five of which found a significant correlation. Five studies looked for any link between reduction in metamorphopsia and improvement in VR-QoL. All five found a significant association. In contrast, only two of eight studies found any association between preoperative vision and VR-QoL, and none found any relationship between improvement in visual acuity and improvement in VR-QoL.

Conclusions: Although the published evidence is limited, it appears that metamorphopsia may be a better predictor of preoperative and postoperative VR-QoL than visual acuity. Further research is necessary to confirm this, but metamorphopsia should be measured when assessing vitreomacular interface disorders.

Abstract Image

在玻璃体黄斑界面障碍中,变形比视力更重要吗?范围审查。
背景:已知玻璃体黄斑界面疾病会降低视力相关生活质量(VR-QoL)。这是由于视力下降和变形所致。在临床实践中,视力是常规测量,但定量测量变形的频率较低。我们进行了一项范围广泛的文献综述,以确定变形或视力对VR-QoL的影响最大。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,对以英文发表并在Medline或Embase中检索的研究进行文献综述。共确定了65项研究。55例因不符合纳入标准而被排除。结果:10篇文献中,6篇研究了视网膜前膜,2篇研究了全层黄斑孔,1篇研究了有或无黄斑孔的玻璃体黄斑牵引,1篇包括黄斑孔和视网膜前膜。采用多种不同的方法测量变形和VR-QoL。在报道术前变形与VR-QoL之间关系的8项研究中,有5项发现了显著相关性。6项研究调查了术后变形与VR-QoL之间的关系,其中5项研究发现了显著的相关性。五项研究寻找变形症的减少和VR-QoL的改善之间的联系。这五个人都发现了显著的关联。相比之下,八项研究中只有两项发现术前视力和VR-QoL之间存在关联,没有一项发现视力改善和VR-QoL之间存在任何关系。结论:虽然已发表的证据有限,但与视力相比,变形可能是术前和术后VR-QoL的更好预测指标。需要进一步的研究来证实这一点,但在评估玻璃体黄斑界面障碍时应测量变形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书