Sofia Salari, Yasamin Moeinipour, Ghazaleh Elahabadi, Aliasghar Moeinipour, Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour
{"title":"Sleep effects of hydrophilic and lipophilic statins: a comparative narrative review of clinical and experimental evidence.","authors":"Sofia Salari, Yasamin Moeinipour, Ghazaleh Elahabadi, Aliasghar Moeinipour, Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statins inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase to reduce cardiovascular risk, but may induce neuropsychiatric adverse effects. Sleep disturbances, especially insomnia and vivid dreams, are frequently reported, particularly with lipophilic statins that cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, randomized trials often show minimal objective effects, highlighting the need for integrated evidence. This narrative review synthesized data from human clinical trials, pharmacovigilance databases, animal studies, and molecular investigations to clarify the relationship between statin lipophilicity and sleep outcomes. The evidence remains mixed. Objective polysomnography trials generally show minimal adverse effects or slight improvements in sleep continuity, particularly with the use of hydrophilic statins. In contrast, real-world data and case reports indicate higher rates of insomnia and nightmares with lipophilic agents, particularly simvastatin, likely reflecting pharmacokinetic differences and possible nocebo effects. Lipophilic statins may influence brain cholesterol metabolism and neurotransmission, contributing to subjective sleep disturbances, whereas hydrophilic statins appear to be sleep-neutral. BBB penetration is a key determinant. Future head-to-head trials and individualized prescriptions may optimize the benefit-to-risk balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"71-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000872","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statins inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase to reduce cardiovascular risk, but may induce neuropsychiatric adverse effects. Sleep disturbances, especially insomnia and vivid dreams, are frequently reported, particularly with lipophilic statins that cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, randomized trials often show minimal objective effects, highlighting the need for integrated evidence. This narrative review synthesized data from human clinical trials, pharmacovigilance databases, animal studies, and molecular investigations to clarify the relationship between statin lipophilicity and sleep outcomes. The evidence remains mixed. Objective polysomnography trials generally show minimal adverse effects or slight improvements in sleep continuity, particularly with the use of hydrophilic statins. In contrast, real-world data and case reports indicate higher rates of insomnia and nightmares with lipophilic agents, particularly simvastatin, likely reflecting pharmacokinetic differences and possible nocebo effects. Lipophilic statins may influence brain cholesterol metabolism and neurotransmission, contributing to subjective sleep disturbances, whereas hydrophilic statins appear to be sleep-neutral. BBB penetration is a key determinant. Future head-to-head trials and individualized prescriptions may optimize the benefit-to-risk balance.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.