From indifference to advocacy: Investigating the effects of interconnectedness and critical reflection on promoting collective action intention within LGBT+ and heterosexual cisgender individuals.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Karen H L Shen, Ben C L Yu, Luly W L Lai, Winnie W S Mak
{"title":"From indifference to advocacy: Investigating the effects of interconnectedness and critical reflection on promoting collective action intention within LGBT+ and heterosexual cisgender individuals.","authors":"Karen H L Shen, Ben C L Yu, Luly W L Lai, Winnie W S Mak","doi":"10.1037/ort0000901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two studies investigated the roles of interconnectedness and critical reflection in reducing indifference and mobilizing collective action intentions for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT+) and other social minoritized groups. Study 1 used a cross-sectional design with 378 heterosexual cisgender participants recruited from Hong Kong. Findings indicated that critical reflection accounted for significant variance in indifference toward LGBT+ and minoritized groups (Δ<i>R</i>² = .07-.18, <i>p</i> < .001) and collective action intentions (Δ<i>R</i>² = .04-.20, <i>p</i> < .001). Interconnectedness also contributed to variance in these outcomes, but to a lesser extent (Δ<i>R</i>² = .02-.05, <i>p</i> < .01). Study 2 employed a 3 (interconnectedness, critical reflection, and control) by 2 (sample types: 111 heterosexual cisgender and 112 LGBT+) experimental design with participants recruited in Hong Kong. In other words, participants were randomly assigned to six experimental conditions to evaluate how different inductions worked on indifference and collective action intentions in sexual and gender diverse samples. Results showed that, among heterosexual cisgender participants, both inductions effectively lowered indifference toward LGBT+ and minoritized groups (<i>p</i> < .001) and enhanced LGBT+ collective action intentions (<i>p</i> = .001-.01). Among LGBT+ participants, while interconnectedness decreased indifferences, it did not significantly increase collective action intentions, suggesting different mechanisms of attitude change and behavioral intention across social groups. These findings highlight the potential of interconnectedness and critical reflection as strategies to mobilize heterosexual cisgender individuals and the LGBT+ community in addressing social injustices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two studies investigated the roles of interconnectedness and critical reflection in reducing indifference and mobilizing collective action intentions for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT+) and other social minoritized groups. Study 1 used a cross-sectional design with 378 heterosexual cisgender participants recruited from Hong Kong. Findings indicated that critical reflection accounted for significant variance in indifference toward LGBT+ and minoritized groups (ΔR² = .07-.18, p < .001) and collective action intentions (ΔR² = .04-.20, p < .001). Interconnectedness also contributed to variance in these outcomes, but to a lesser extent (ΔR² = .02-.05, p < .01). Study 2 employed a 3 (interconnectedness, critical reflection, and control) by 2 (sample types: 111 heterosexual cisgender and 112 LGBT+) experimental design with participants recruited in Hong Kong. In other words, participants were randomly assigned to six experimental conditions to evaluate how different inductions worked on indifference and collective action intentions in sexual and gender diverse samples. Results showed that, among heterosexual cisgender participants, both inductions effectively lowered indifference toward LGBT+ and minoritized groups (p < .001) and enhanced LGBT+ collective action intentions (p = .001-.01). Among LGBT+ participants, while interconnectedness decreased indifferences, it did not significantly increase collective action intentions, suggesting different mechanisms of attitude change and behavioral intention across social groups. These findings highlight the potential of interconnectedness and critical reflection as strategies to mobilize heterosexual cisgender individuals and the LGBT+ community in addressing social injustices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

从冷漠到倡导:探讨互联性和批判性反思对促进LGBT+和异性恋顺性个体集体行动意愿的影响。
两项研究调查了互联性和批判性反思在减少男女同性恋、双性恋和变性人(LGBT+)和其他社会少数群体的冷漠和动员集体行动意愿方面的作用。研究1采用横断面设计,从香港招募了378名异性恋顺性别参与者。结果表明,批判性反思对LGBT+和少数群体的冷漠(ΔR²= 0.07 - 0.18,p < .001)和集体行动意愿(ΔR²= 0.04 - 0.20,p < .001)有显著差异。互联性也导致了这些结果的差异,但程度较小(ΔR²= 0.02 - 0.05,p < 0.01)。研究2采用了3(互联性、批判性反思和控制)× 2(样本类型:111名异性恋、顺性恋和112名LGBT+)的实验设计,参与者来自香港。换句话说,参与者被随机分配到六个实验条件下,以评估不同的诱导对性别和性别不同样本中的冷漠和集体行动意图的影响。结果显示,在异性恋顺性被试中,两种诱导都有效降低了对LGBT+和少数群体的冷漠(p < 0.001),增强了LGBT+群体的集体行动意愿(p = 0.001 - 0.01)。在LGBT+参与者中,虽然相互联系减少了冷漠,但没有显著增加集体行动意愿,这表明不同社会群体的态度变化和行为意愿的机制不同。这些发现强调了相互联系和批判性反思的潜力,作为动员异性恋、双性恋和LGBT+群体解决社会不公正问题的策略。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry publishes articles that clarify, challenge, or reshape the prevailing understanding of factors in the prevention and correction of injustice and in the sustainable development of a humane and just society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书