Everyday conversations of younger and older couples: Age differences in we-ness, emotions, and conversation topics.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Tabea Meier, Zilla M Huber, Olenka Dworakowski, Claudia M Haase, Ryan L Boyd, Andrea B Horn
{"title":"Everyday conversations of younger and older couples: Age differences in we-ness, emotions, and conversation topics.","authors":"Tabea Meier, Zilla M Huber, Olenka Dworakowski, Claudia M Haase, Ryan L Boyd, Andrea B Horn","doi":"10.1037/pag0000971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotional aging theories suggest that individuals increasingly prioritize close relationships and positive emotions as they get older. Past studies often used single-subject designs to test these predictions. Dyadic studies are rare and even fewer have examined how romantic partners interact in everyday life. Social sensing offers novel opportunities to study couples' socioemotional processes \"in the wild\" through naturalistic conversations. In this 21-day experience-sampling study, 55 younger (18-33 years) and 43 older couples (57-87 years) recorded at least two conversations on a smartphone. We used natural language analysis to examine age differences in we-ness (i.e., communal orientation and based on we-pronouns), positive and negative emotions (emotion words and laughter), and central themes (using the meaning extraction method) in daily conversations. The results from multilevel modeling revealed that older (vs. younger) couples' conversations were characterized by greater we-ness and less positive emotions (i.e., fewer positive emotion words and less laughter). Exploratory follow-up analyses suggest that age differences in positive emotions may have been driven by arousal, as older couples' conversations scored lower in positive high-arousal words. Age differences in negative emotion word use were not statistically significant. Analyses further revealed seven common conversation themes (e.g., social relationships, daily routine, food, money, or sleep). Younger couples, for example, referred more to other people and older couples more to places or orientation. In line with emotional aging theories, these findings show that older adults exhibit greater interdependence and lower high-arousal positive emotions in their everyday interactions and open the door for the future research on real-life couple interactions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":"41 2","pages":"241-255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000971","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotional aging theories suggest that individuals increasingly prioritize close relationships and positive emotions as they get older. Past studies often used single-subject designs to test these predictions. Dyadic studies are rare and even fewer have examined how romantic partners interact in everyday life. Social sensing offers novel opportunities to study couples' socioemotional processes "in the wild" through naturalistic conversations. In this 21-day experience-sampling study, 55 younger (18-33 years) and 43 older couples (57-87 years) recorded at least two conversations on a smartphone. We used natural language analysis to examine age differences in we-ness (i.e., communal orientation and based on we-pronouns), positive and negative emotions (emotion words and laughter), and central themes (using the meaning extraction method) in daily conversations. The results from multilevel modeling revealed that older (vs. younger) couples' conversations were characterized by greater we-ness and less positive emotions (i.e., fewer positive emotion words and less laughter). Exploratory follow-up analyses suggest that age differences in positive emotions may have been driven by arousal, as older couples' conversations scored lower in positive high-arousal words. Age differences in negative emotion word use were not statistically significant. Analyses further revealed seven common conversation themes (e.g., social relationships, daily routine, food, money, or sleep). Younger couples, for example, referred more to other people and older couples more to places or orientation. In line with emotional aging theories, these findings show that older adults exhibit greater interdependence and lower high-arousal positive emotions in their everyday interactions and open the door for the future research on real-life couple interactions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

年轻夫妇和老年夫妇的日常对话:我们的年龄差异,情绪和谈话主题。
情绪衰老理论认为,随着年龄的增长,人们越来越重视亲密关系和积极情绪。过去的研究通常使用单受试者设计来测试这些预测。对情侣在日常生活中如何互动的研究很少,甚至更少。社会感知提供了新的机会,通过自然对话来研究夫妻在“野外”的社会情感过程。在这项为期21天的经验抽样研究中,55对年龄较小的夫妇(18-33岁)和43对年龄较大的夫妇(57-87岁)用智能手机记录了至少两次对话。我们使用自然语言分析来检查日常对话中我们(即基于我们代词的公共取向),积极和消极情绪(情感词和笑声)以及中心主题(使用意义提取方法)的年龄差异。多层模型的结果显示,年龄较大的夫妇(相对于年轻的夫妇)的谈话特点是更多的“我们”和更少的积极情绪(即更少的积极情绪词汇和更少的笑声)。探索性的后续分析表明,积极情绪的年龄差异可能是由觉醒驱动的,因为老年夫妇的谈话在积极的高唤醒词上得分较低。消极情绪词汇使用的年龄差异无统计学意义。进一步的分析揭示了七个常见的谈话主题(例如,社会关系、日常事务、食物、金钱或睡眠)。例如,年轻的夫妇更多地提到其他人,而年长的夫妇更多地提到地点或方向。与情绪老化理论一致,这些发现表明老年人在日常交往中表现出更大的相互依赖性和更低的高唤醒积极情绪,这为未来对现实生活中夫妻互动的研究打开了大门。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书