One-year cancer risk after detection of blast cells in peripheral blood.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Pernille Just Vinholt, Rasmus Bank Lynggaard, Katrine Sølling Borlund Mortensen, Maria Boysen Sandberg, Kim Oren Gradel, Anne Stidsholt Roug, Henrik Frederiksen
{"title":"One-year cancer risk after detection of blast cells in peripheral blood.","authors":"Pernille Just Vinholt, Rasmus Bank Lynggaard, Katrine Sølling Borlund Mortensen, Maria Boysen Sandberg, Kim Oren Gradel, Anne Stidsholt Roug, Henrik Frederiksen","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2026.2632326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Haematologists are often consulted on the need for additional diagnostic workup in patients with blast cells in peripheral blood. However, cancer risk (including solid tumors) after detection of blast cells in peripheral blood is lacking. Therefore we evaluated the 1-year cancer risk following detection of blast cells in peripheral blood. We used population-based retrospective data from the Region of Southern Denmark (2014-2021), including 2,187 individuals aged ≥20 years with blast cells in blood samples, excluding those with prior cancer. Results from haematological parameters derived from the laboratory information system, while diagnoses and vital status were from administrative registers. Natural language processing assisted review of clinical notes for individuals without cancer codes. We estimated age-standardised cancer incidence rates and compared observed versus expected cancers using standardised incidence ratios (SIR). We found that the overall 1-year cancer risk was 23% [95% CI: 21-24], with 19% [95% CI: 18-21] for haematological cancers and 3% [95% CI: 2-3] for solid cancers, compared to 0.87% in the background population. The age-adjusted SIR was 22 [95% CI: 21-24] and was highest for haematological cancers at 199 [95% CI: 184-214]. Although 78% of individuals had no blast cells upon repeated testing, 27% still developed cancer within a year. In conclusion the presence of blast cells in peripheral blood may warrant consideration of further diagnostic evaluation, particularly in the presence of other haematological abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"141-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2026.2632326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Haematologists are often consulted on the need for additional diagnostic workup in patients with blast cells in peripheral blood. However, cancer risk (including solid tumors) after detection of blast cells in peripheral blood is lacking. Therefore we evaluated the 1-year cancer risk following detection of blast cells in peripheral blood. We used population-based retrospective data from the Region of Southern Denmark (2014-2021), including 2,187 individuals aged ≥20 years with blast cells in blood samples, excluding those with prior cancer. Results from haematological parameters derived from the laboratory information system, while diagnoses and vital status were from administrative registers. Natural language processing assisted review of clinical notes for individuals without cancer codes. We estimated age-standardised cancer incidence rates and compared observed versus expected cancers using standardised incidence ratios (SIR). We found that the overall 1-year cancer risk was 23% [95% CI: 21-24], with 19% [95% CI: 18-21] for haematological cancers and 3% [95% CI: 2-3] for solid cancers, compared to 0.87% in the background population. The age-adjusted SIR was 22 [95% CI: 21-24] and was highest for haematological cancers at 199 [95% CI: 184-214]. Although 78% of individuals had no blast cells upon repeated testing, 27% still developed cancer within a year. In conclusion the presence of blast cells in peripheral blood may warrant consideration of further diagnostic evaluation, particularly in the presence of other haematological abnormalities.

在外周血中检测到胚细胞后一年患癌症的风险。
血液科医生经常被问及是否需要对外周血中有原始细胞的患者进行额外的诊断检查。然而,在外周血中检测到胚细胞后,癌症风险(包括实体瘤)缺乏。因此,我们评估了在外周血中检测到胚细胞后的1年癌症风险。我们使用了来自丹麦南部地区(2014-2021)的基于人群的回顾性数据,包括2187名年龄≥20岁的人,血液样本中有原始细胞,不包括既往癌症患者。结果来自实验室信息系统的血液学参数,而诊断和生命状态来自行政登记。自然语言处理辅助审查临床记录的个人没有癌症代码。我们估计了年龄标准化的癌症发病率,并使用标准化发病率比(SIR)比较了观察到的癌症和预期的癌症。我们发现总体1年癌症风险为23% [95% CI: 21-24],血液学癌症为19% [95% CI: 18-21],实体癌症为3% [95% CI: 2-3],而背景人群为0.87%。年龄校正SIR为22 [95% CI: 21-24],血液学癌症最高SIR为199 [95% CI: 184-214]。尽管78%的人在反复测试后没有发现原始细胞,但仍有27%的人在一年内患上了癌症。总之,外周血中存在母细胞可能需要考虑进一步的诊断评估,特别是在其他血液学异常的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书