Endometriosis Pain Index: development of a model to predict poor pain-related quality of life after endometriosis surgery through machine learning analysis of registry data.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
PAIN® Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003915
Dwayne R Tucker, Brie Dungate, Derek S Chiu, Heather L Noga, Caroline Lee, Mohamed A Bedaiwy, Christina Williams, Catherine Allaire, Aline Talhouk, Paul J Yong
{"title":"Endometriosis Pain Index: development of a model to predict poor pain-related quality of life after endometriosis surgery through machine learning analysis of registry data.","authors":"Dwayne R Tucker, Brie Dungate, Derek S Chiu, Heather L Noga, Caroline Lee, Mohamed A Bedaiwy, Christina Williams, Catherine Allaire, Aline Talhouk, Paul J Yong","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Predictive tools are lacking for pain-related outcomes after endometriosis surgery. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning-based clinical model to predict poor pain-related quality of life after endometriosis surgery. Registry data from a prospective longitudinal cohort at a tertiary referral center (2013-2020) was used for model development and validation. Participants underwent an index endometriosis surgery, and completed the pain subscale of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) at baseline and 1-2-year follow-up. The outcome was poor pain-related quality of life defined as EHP-30 pain subscale above the 75th percentile for North America, at 1 to 2 years postsurgery. Thirty-two preoperative factors were evaluated, with final models retaining the top 10 most important predictors. Elastic net logistic regression, random forest (RF) and multilayer perceptron neural network models were developed. Internal validation was performed using 500 bootstrap samples, and a held-out test cohort. The study included 650 participants: 488 in the training cohort and 162 in a held-out test cohort. The RF model exhibited the most consistent discrimination, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, between the training cohort (0.768; 95% CI: 0.690-0.837) and test cohort (0.766; 95% CI: 0.676-0.863, Δ = -0.002). The RF model also demonstrated the best integrated calibration index (0.029) and highest net benefit. Final preoperative predictors for the RF model included baseline EHP-30 score, surgery type (conservative fertility-sparing vs hysterectomy), anxiety scores, depression scores, pain catastrophizing scale scores, abdominal wall pain, pelvic floor myalgia, smoking status, back pain, and race/ethnicity. We present the RF model as the Endometriosis Pain Index to aid preoperative counselling for endometriosis surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"1026-1039"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003915","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Predictive tools are lacking for pain-related outcomes after endometriosis surgery. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning-based clinical model to predict poor pain-related quality of life after endometriosis surgery. Registry data from a prospective longitudinal cohort at a tertiary referral center (2013-2020) was used for model development and validation. Participants underwent an index endometriosis surgery, and completed the pain subscale of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) at baseline and 1-2-year follow-up. The outcome was poor pain-related quality of life defined as EHP-30 pain subscale above the 75th percentile for North America, at 1 to 2 years postsurgery. Thirty-two preoperative factors were evaluated, with final models retaining the top 10 most important predictors. Elastic net logistic regression, random forest (RF) and multilayer perceptron neural network models were developed. Internal validation was performed using 500 bootstrap samples, and a held-out test cohort. The study included 650 participants: 488 in the training cohort and 162 in a held-out test cohort. The RF model exhibited the most consistent discrimination, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, between the training cohort (0.768; 95% CI: 0.690-0.837) and test cohort (0.766; 95% CI: 0.676-0.863, Δ = -0.002). The RF model also demonstrated the best integrated calibration index (0.029) and highest net benefit. Final preoperative predictors for the RF model included baseline EHP-30 score, surgery type (conservative fertility-sparing vs hysterectomy), anxiety scores, depression scores, pain catastrophizing scale scores, abdominal wall pain, pelvic floor myalgia, smoking status, back pain, and race/ethnicity. We present the RF model as the Endometriosis Pain Index to aid preoperative counselling for endometriosis surgery.

子宫内膜异位症疼痛指数:通过机器学习分析注册数据,开发一个模型来预测子宫内膜异位症手术后与疼痛相关的不良生活质量。
摘要:目前缺乏预测子宫内膜异位症手术后疼痛相关结果的工具。本研究的目的是开发和验证基于机器学习的临床模型,以预测子宫内膜异位症手术后与疼痛相关的不良生活质量。来自三级转诊中心的前瞻性纵向队列注册数据(2013-2020年)用于模型开发和验证。参与者接受了指数子宫内膜异位症手术,并在基线和1-2年随访期间完成了子宫内膜异位症健康概况-30 (EHP-30)的疼痛亚量表。结果是术后1 - 2年疼痛相关生活质量差,定义为北美EHP-30疼痛亚量表高于第75百分位。评估了32个术前因素,最终模型保留了前10个最重要的预测因素。建立了弹性网络逻辑回归、随机森林和多层感知器神经网络模型。使用500个bootstrap样本和一个hold -out测试队列进行内部验证。这项研究包括650名参与者:488人在训练组,162人在测试组。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积测量,RF模型在训练队列(0.768;95% CI: 0.690-0.837)和测试队列(0.766;95% CI: 0.676-0.863, Δ = -0.002)之间表现出最一致的区分。该模型具有最佳的综合标定指数(0.029)和最高的净效益。RF模型的最终术前预测指标包括基线EHP-30评分、手术类型(保守保留生育能力vs子宫切除术)、焦虑评分、抑郁评分、疼痛灾难化量表评分、腹壁疼痛、盆底肌痛、吸烟状况、背痛和种族/民族。我们提出射频模型作为子宫内膜异位症疼痛指数,以帮助术前咨询子宫内膜异位症手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书