Subcortical Stimulation for Functional Brain Mapping: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Adrian Safa, David Sabsevitz, Marco Failla Mulone, Anteneh M Feyissa, Seyed M Mirsattari, Ipshita Garg, Rena Wolf, Phillip Gauthier, Kaisorn Chaichana, Sanjeet S Grewal, Victoria Clark, Richard Byrne, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, William O Tatum, Brin E Freund
{"title":"Subcortical Stimulation for Functional Brain Mapping: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Adrian Safa, David Sabsevitz, Marco Failla Mulone, Anteneh M Feyissa, Seyed M Mirsattari, Ipshita Garg, Rena Wolf, Phillip Gauthier, Kaisorn Chaichana, Sanjeet S Grewal, Victoria Clark, Richard Byrne, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, William O Tatum, Brin E Freund","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Subcortical functional brain mapping is a valuable technique, especially involving lesions within or near white matter tracts. Motor and language deficits caused by intraoperative damage to these subcortical fibers are associated with worse outcomes. However, there are variable approaches to performing subcortical functional brain mapping. This systematic review was performed to better understand indications and optimal stimulation parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed by PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases. Search dates ranged from inception to November 30th, 2024. Studies included adults who underwent subcortical electrical stimulation for functional brain mapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 articles (249 patients, mean age 44.8 years, 114 female) were included. The most common pathology was brain tumor (96.3%), primarily gliomas and metastases, and 24.4% of all cases had a history of epilepsy. The most frequently mapped white matter tracts were the arcuate fasciculus, corticospinal/pyramidal tract, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, involving motor, language, and cognitive functions. Bipolar stimulation (50-60 Hz, 0.5-1 millisecond, 1-10 mA) was preferred over monopolar stimulation. Among 147 patients with outcome data, 89.1% did not suffer permanent adverse outcomes including neurologic deficits, although long-term outcomes were inconsistently reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The methodologic variability of subcortical functional brain mapping and lack of long-term follow-up reported limits determination of optimal parameter selection for electrical stimulation although common trends are reported. Functional brain mapping approaches may be guided by the tract and network involved. Further studies are needed to develop a standardized approach and more definitive guideline to its performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Subcortical functional brain mapping is a valuable technique, especially involving lesions within or near white matter tracts. Motor and language deficits caused by intraoperative damage to these subcortical fibers are associated with worse outcomes. However, there are variable approaches to performing subcortical functional brain mapping. This systematic review was performed to better understand indications and optimal stimulation parameters.

Methods: A systematic review was performed by PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases. Search dates ranged from inception to November 30th, 2024. Studies included adults who underwent subcortical electrical stimulation for functional brain mapping.

Results: A total of 55 articles (249 patients, mean age 44.8 years, 114 female) were included. The most common pathology was brain tumor (96.3%), primarily gliomas and metastases, and 24.4% of all cases had a history of epilepsy. The most frequently mapped white matter tracts were the arcuate fasciculus, corticospinal/pyramidal tract, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, involving motor, language, and cognitive functions. Bipolar stimulation (50-60 Hz, 0.5-1 millisecond, 1-10 mA) was preferred over monopolar stimulation. Among 147 patients with outcome data, 89.1% did not suffer permanent adverse outcomes including neurologic deficits, although long-term outcomes were inconsistently reported.

Conclusions: The methodologic variability of subcortical functional brain mapping and lack of long-term follow-up reported limits determination of optimal parameter selection for electrical stimulation although common trends are reported. Functional brain mapping approaches may be guided by the tract and network involved. Further studies are needed to develop a standardized approach and more definitive guideline to its performance.

皮层下刺激对脑功能映射的系统评价。
目的:皮层下脑功能测绘是一项有价值的技术,特别是涉及白质束内或附近的病变。术中皮层下纤维损伤引起的运动和语言缺陷与较差的预后相关。然而,有不同的方法来执行皮层下功能性脑映射。为了更好地了解适应症和最佳刺激参数,进行了系统回顾。方法:根据PRISMA指南,使用PubMed、Scopus和Medline数据库进行系统评价。搜索日期从开始到2024年11月30日。研究对象包括接受皮层下电刺激进行脑功能测绘的成年人。结果:共纳入55篇文献(249例,平均年龄44.8岁,女性114例)。最常见的病理是脑肿瘤(96.3%),主要是胶质瘤和转移瘤,24.4%的病例有癫痫史。最常见的白质束是弓状束、皮质脊髓/锥体束和额枕下束,涉及运动、语言和认知功能。双极刺激(50-60 Hz, 0.5-1毫秒,1-10 mA)优于单极刺激。在147例有结果数据的患者中,89.1%没有出现永久性不良结果,包括神经功能缺损,尽管长期结果的报道不一致。结论:尽管有常见趋势的报道,但皮质下脑功能测绘的方法学差异和缺乏长期随访限制了电刺激最佳参数选择的确定。功能性脑制图方法可由相关的神经束和神经网络引导。需要进行进一步的研究,以制定标准化的方法和更明确的执行准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书