Preferences and acceptability of telemedicine in Belgian IBD patients.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
K Troch, H Piessevaux, O Dewit
{"title":"Preferences and acceptability of telemedicine in Belgian IBD patients.","authors":"K Troch, H Piessevaux, O Dewit","doi":"10.51821/89.1.14704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), in particular Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic conditions that have a considerable impact on patients' quality of life and healthcare resources, as they require frequent visits and hospitalisations. Telemedicine offers a potential advantage by enabling remote healthcare. Studies have shown that telemedicine can improve quality of life and reduce healthcare use, although results vary depending on study design and location. Our study investigates the views of French-speaking Belgian IBD patients on telemedicine. It aims to assess acceptability and preferences to guide future implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a questionnaire available online (between October 2023 and June 2024) for which any patient with IBD followed up in an adult gastroenterology consultation was eligible. The 69-item questionnaire was validated by test patients and distributed via Epic®, social media and printed forms. Data were collected using REDCap® and analyzed using SPSS®, applying univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors influencing acceptance of telemedicine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>257 respondents validated their questionnaire. The majority were women (54%) with an average age of 45 years [17-85]. Most patients had Crohn's disease (63%) and were using immunosuppressive therapy (44%) and/or biologics (30%), with a high compliance rate (98%). Although 68% had discovered telemedicine because of our survey, 82% were interested in remote consultations, citing time savings and reduced absence from work as advantages, while expressing concerns about reduced personal contact and technical problems. Acceptance was significantly associated with time saved and frequency of visits (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reveals strong acceptance of telemedicine, regardless of previous experience, with a preference for video over telephone consultations. It also demonstrates openness to follow-up without direct human contact (e.g., application-based tools), although concerns remain about the potential loss of personal interaction. The results underline the importance of addressing patient concerns and ensuring a solid human and technical infrastructure for the expansion of telemedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":"89 1","pages":"55-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/89.1.14704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), in particular Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic conditions that have a considerable impact on patients' quality of life and healthcare resources, as they require frequent visits and hospitalisations. Telemedicine offers a potential advantage by enabling remote healthcare. Studies have shown that telemedicine can improve quality of life and reduce healthcare use, although results vary depending on study design and location. Our study investigates the views of French-speaking Belgian IBD patients on telemedicine. It aims to assess acceptability and preferences to guide future implementation.

Methods: We designed a questionnaire available online (between October 2023 and June 2024) for which any patient with IBD followed up in an adult gastroenterology consultation was eligible. The 69-item questionnaire was validated by test patients and distributed via Epic®, social media and printed forms. Data were collected using REDCap® and analyzed using SPSS®, applying univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors influencing acceptance of telemedicine.

Results: 257 respondents validated their questionnaire. The majority were women (54%) with an average age of 45 years [17-85]. Most patients had Crohn's disease (63%) and were using immunosuppressive therapy (44%) and/or biologics (30%), with a high compliance rate (98%). Although 68% had discovered telemedicine because of our survey, 82% were interested in remote consultations, citing time savings and reduced absence from work as advantages, while expressing concerns about reduced personal contact and technical problems. Acceptance was significantly associated with time saved and frequency of visits (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Our study reveals strong acceptance of telemedicine, regardless of previous experience, with a preference for video over telephone consultations. It also demonstrates openness to follow-up without direct human contact (e.g., application-based tools), although concerns remain about the potential loss of personal interaction. The results underline the importance of addressing patient concerns and ensuring a solid human and technical infrastructure for the expansion of telemedicine.

比利时IBD患者远程医疗的偏好和可接受性。
炎症性肠病(IBD),特别是克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC),是一种慢性疾病,对患者的生活质量和医疗资源有相当大的影响,因为它们需要频繁的就诊和住院治疗。远程医疗通过支持远程医疗提供了一个潜在的优势。研究表明,远程医疗可以改善生活质量并减少医疗保健使用,尽管结果因研究设计和地点而异。我们的研究调查了法语比利时IBD患者对远程医疗的看法。它旨在评估可接受性和偏好,以指导未来的实施。方法:我们设计了一份在线调查问卷(在2023年10月至2024年6月期间),任何在成人胃肠病学咨询中随访的IBD患者都符合条件。69项问卷由测试患者验证,并通过Epic®、社交媒体和打印表格分发。使用REDCap®收集数据,并使用SPSS®进行分析,采用单因素和多因素分析来确定影响远程医疗接受度的因素。结果:257名被调查者对问卷进行了验证。多数为女性(54%),平均年龄45岁[17-85]。大多数患者患有克罗恩病(63%),使用免疫抑制治疗(44%)和/或生物制剂(30%),依从率高(98%)。虽然68%的人因为我们的调查而发现了远程医疗,但82%的人对远程咨询感兴趣,他们认为节省时间和减少缺勤是优势,同时表示担心减少个人接触和技术问题。接受度与节省的时间和就诊频率显著相关(结论:我们的研究表明,无论以前的经验如何,人们对远程医疗的接受程度都很高,更倾向于视频而不是电话咨询。它还显示了在没有直接人际接触(例如,基于应用程序的工具)的情况下对后续工作的开放性,尽管人们仍然担心可能会失去人际互动。研究结果强调了解决患者关切问题和确保为扩大远程医疗建立坚实的人力和技术基础设施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书