Non-State Regulators? Civil Society as Extension of the State in a Context of a Regularization Scheme for Undocumented Migrants

IF 2.9 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Jan-Erik Refle, Adela Sanela Elezovic, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, Yves Jackson
{"title":"Non-State Regulators? Civil Society as Extension of the State in a Context of a Regularization Scheme for Undocumented Migrants","authors":"Jan-Erik Refle,&nbsp;Adela Sanela Elezovic,&nbsp;Claudine Burton-Jeangros,&nbsp;Yves Jackson","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>“Opération Papyrus” was implemented in the Swiss Canton of Geneva between 2017 and 2018 with the aim of granting residence permits to undocumented migrants who met pre-established criteria. This program serves as an exemplary case of involving nongovernmental actors to facilitate what were originally state-controlled procedures. Civil society organizations (CSOs) exercised discretionary power and played a pivotal role in negotiating the program's design and acting as gatekeepers, ensuring that only eligible individuals applied, thereby reducing the administrative workload. Our paper primarily focuses on the unique role played by civil society organizations, extending the reach of the state, as they acted independently as regulators and maintained proximity to the individuals involved, enhancing the program's effectiveness. The analysis is based on 10 retrospective interviews with cantonal and federal civil servants and representatives from CSOs, supplemented with additional official documents.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Opération Papyrus” was implemented in the Swiss Canton of Geneva between 2017 and 2018 with the aim of granting residence permits to undocumented migrants who met pre-established criteria. This program serves as an exemplary case of involving nongovernmental actors to facilitate what were originally state-controlled procedures. Civil society organizations (CSOs) exercised discretionary power and played a pivotal role in negotiating the program's design and acting as gatekeepers, ensuring that only eligible individuals applied, thereby reducing the administrative workload. Our paper primarily focuses on the unique role played by civil society organizations, extending the reach of the state, as they acted independently as regulators and maintained proximity to the individuals involved, enhancing the program's effectiveness. The analysis is based on 10 retrospective interviews with cantonal and federal civil servants and representatives from CSOs, supplemented with additional official documents.

Abstract Image

非国有监管机构?在无证移民正规化计划的背景下,民间社会是国家的延伸
2017年至2018年在瑞士日内瓦州实施了“opsamicration Papyrus”,目的是向符合预先设定标准的无证移民发放居留许可。该项目是一个范例,它让非政府行为体参与进来,促进原本由国家控制的程序。民间社会组织(cso)行使自由裁量权,在项目设计谈判中发挥关键作用,并充当看门人,确保只有符合条件的个人申请,从而减少行政工作量。我们的论文主要关注民间社会组织所发挥的独特作用,扩大了国家的影响范围,因为它们作为监管者独立行事,并与相关个人保持密切联系,从而提高了项目的有效性。该分析基于对州和联邦公务员以及民间社会组织代表的10次回顾性访谈,并辅以额外的官方文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Policy Analysis
European Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书