Rob Manfred, Gambling, and Rearticulating “Baseball’s Best Interests”

IF 2.5 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Michael J. Delayo
{"title":"Rob Manfred, Gambling, and Rearticulating “Baseball’s Best Interests”","authors":"Michael J. Delayo","doi":"10.1177/21674795261430902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred, gambling’s relationship with baseball has been a top priority. His frequent attention to the subject aligns with the history of a commissionership that, since its creation in the wake of the 1919 Black Sox scandal, has prioritized keeping baseball at a safe distance from the negative associations of gambling. In direct contrast with his predecessors, however, Manfred has spent his tenure not denigrating but justifying the union of baseball and gambling. This essay argues that Manfred’s support of gambling comes at the expense of MLB ballplayers who, since sports gambling’s relegalization, have been subject to unprecedented quantities of personal threats. Manfred’s insistence that partnerships with sportsbooks and other gambling companies help protect baseball’s competitive integrity clashes with the presence of threats to ballplayers and a growing list of public gambling-related scandals in the sport. To track the public comments Commissioner Manfred makes is to see the path of gambling in baseball shift from immoral incursion to essential partner. Manfred’s communication about the intensifying integration of gambling into baseball demonstrate that “the best interests of baseball” are being deemed worth the risk to professional ballplayers.","PeriodicalId":46882,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Sport","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795261430902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred, gambling’s relationship with baseball has been a top priority. His frequent attention to the subject aligns with the history of a commissionership that, since its creation in the wake of the 1919 Black Sox scandal, has prioritized keeping baseball at a safe distance from the negative associations of gambling. In direct contrast with his predecessors, however, Manfred has spent his tenure not denigrating but justifying the union of baseball and gambling. This essay argues that Manfred’s support of gambling comes at the expense of MLB ballplayers who, since sports gambling’s relegalization, have been subject to unprecedented quantities of personal threats. Manfred’s insistence that partnerships with sportsbooks and other gambling companies help protect baseball’s competitive integrity clashes with the presence of threats to ballplayers and a growing list of public gambling-related scandals in the sport. To track the public comments Commissioner Manfred makes is to see the path of gambling in baseball shift from immoral incursion to essential partner. Manfred’s communication about the intensifying integration of gambling into baseball demonstrate that “the best interests of baseball” are being deemed worth the risk to professional ballplayers.
罗伯·曼弗雷德,赌博和重新阐释“棒球的最佳利益”
对于美国职业棒球大联盟总裁罗伯·曼弗雷德来说,赌博与棒球的关系一直是重中之重。他对这个话题的频繁关注与棒球委员会的历史相符。自1919年黑袜队(Black Sox)丑闻之后成立以来,该委员会一直优先考虑将棒球与赌博的负面联想保持安全距离。然而,与他的前任形成鲜明对比的是,曼弗雷德在他的任期内没有诋毁棒球和赌博的结合,而是为其辩护。这篇文章认为,曼弗雷德对赌博的支持是以牺牲美国职业棒球大联盟球员为代价的,自从体育赌博降级以来,这些球员一直受到前所未有的个人威胁。曼弗雷德坚持认为,与体育博彩公司和其他博彩公司合作有助于保护棒球的竞争诚信,但这与棒球运动员面临的威胁以及越来越多的与赌博有关的公开丑闻相冲突。追踪曼弗雷德专员的公开评论,可以看到棒球中的赌博从不道德的入侵转变为必不可少的伙伴。曼弗雷德关于赌博与棒球日益融合的交流表明,“棒球的最佳利益”被认为值得职业棒球运动员冒险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书