Phase II randomized controlled trial comparing traditional Thai cannabis-based medicine with lorazepam for insomnia treatment.

IF 3.8 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Thavatchai Kamoltham, Suwadee Chokchaisiri, Chawalit Yongram, Panupan Sripan, Surasak Im-Iam, Panupong Sanasit, Varanon Intaravattana, Chatchai Sawasdichai, Patpong Udompat, Tanawat Chaiphongpachara, Tanawan Kummalue
{"title":"Phase II randomized controlled trial comparing traditional Thai cannabis-based medicine with lorazepam for insomnia treatment.","authors":"Thavatchai Kamoltham, Suwadee Chokchaisiri, Chawalit Yongram, Panupan Sripan, Surasak Im-Iam, Panupong Sanasit, Varanon Intaravattana, Chatchai Sawasdichai, Patpong Udompat, Tanawat Chaiphongpachara, Tanawan Kummalue","doi":"10.1186/s42238-026-00415-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A traditional Thai cannabis-based multi-herbal formulation is legally recognized in Thailand for therapeutic use and clinical research. However, clinical evidence supporting its use for insomnia remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Phase II randomized, double-blind, active-controlled non-inferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of the Anti-Pom-Leung Fever medicine with lorazepam in patients with chronic insomnia. One hundred participants were randomized to receive either the herbal formulation or lorazepam for 4 weeks. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Non-inferiority was evaluated at week 4 using a predefined margin of 2.1 based on the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the mean PSQI difference (experimental minus comparator). Longitudinal changes were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, and safety was evaluated through clinical and laboratory assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two participants completed the study (41 per group). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Both treatments significantly improved sleep quality over 4 weeks. At week 4, mean PSQI scores were 3.44 in the experimental group and 4.78 in the comparator group, with a mean difference of -1.34 (95% CI: -2.99 to 0.31), demonstrating non-inferiority. A significant main effect of time on PSQI scores was observed, with no significant time-by-treatment interaction. Quality of life and stress improved in both groups, and safety profiles were comparable, with no clinically significant adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The traditional Thai cannabis-based multi-herbal formulation demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to lorazepam and was well tolerated, supporting its use as a short-term alternative for chronic insomnia.</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13040682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-026-00415-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A traditional Thai cannabis-based multi-herbal formulation is legally recognized in Thailand for therapeutic use and clinical research. However, clinical evidence supporting its use for insomnia remains limited.

Methods: This Phase II randomized, double-blind, active-controlled non-inferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of the Anti-Pom-Leung Fever medicine with lorazepam in patients with chronic insomnia. One hundred participants were randomized to receive either the herbal formulation or lorazepam for 4 weeks. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Non-inferiority was evaluated at week 4 using a predefined margin of 2.1 based on the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the mean PSQI difference (experimental minus comparator). Longitudinal changes were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, and safety was evaluated through clinical and laboratory assessments.

Results: Eighty-two participants completed the study (41 per group). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Both treatments significantly improved sleep quality over 4 weeks. At week 4, mean PSQI scores were 3.44 in the experimental group and 4.78 in the comparator group, with a mean difference of -1.34 (95% CI: -2.99 to 0.31), demonstrating non-inferiority. A significant main effect of time on PSQI scores was observed, with no significant time-by-treatment interaction. Quality of life and stress improved in both groups, and safety profiles were comparable, with no clinically significant adverse effects.

Conclusions: The traditional Thai cannabis-based multi-herbal formulation demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to lorazepam and was well tolerated, supporting its use as a short-term alternative for chronic insomnia.

II期随机对照试验比较传统泰国大麻药物与劳拉西泮治疗失眠。
背景:传统的泰国大麻为基础的多草药配方在泰国法律上被认可用于治疗和临床研究。然而,支持其用于失眠的临床证据仍然有限。方法:该II期随机、双盲、主动对照非劣效性试验比较抗保良热药与劳拉西泮治疗慢性失眠症患者的疗效和安全性。100名参与者随机接受草药制剂或劳拉西泮4周。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估睡眠质量。非劣效性在第4周进行评估,基于平均PSQI差的双侧95%置信区间的上界(实验减去比较器),使用预定义的2.1边际。采用重复测量方差分析分析纵向变化,并通过临床和实验室评估评估安全性。结果:82名参与者完成了研究(每组41名)。各组间基线特征具有可比性。两种治疗方法在4周内都显著改善了睡眠质量。第4周,实验组的PSQI平均评分为3.44,对照组的PSQI平均评分为4.78,平均差异为-1.34 (95% CI: -2.99 ~ 0.31),无劣效性。观察到时间对PSQI评分有显著的主要影响,没有显著的时间与治疗的相互作用。两组患者的生活质量和压力均有改善,安全性也具有可比性,无明显的临床不良反应。结论:泰国传统的以大麻为基础的多草药制剂的疗效优于劳拉西泮,并且耐受性良好,支持其作为慢性失眠的短期替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书