The diagnostic value of transfistular contrast-enhanced ultrasound in branchial cleft fistulas.

IF 2.3
Medical ultrasonography Pub Date : 2026-09-23 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.11152/mu-4587
Yawen Chen, Quan Zeng, Jiangyan Yin, Wenqi Zuo, Xuemei He
{"title":"The diagnostic value of transfistular contrast-enhanced ultrasound in branchial cleft fistulas.","authors":"Yawen Chen, Quan Zeng, Jiangyan Yin, Wenqi Zuo, Xuemei He","doi":"10.11152/mu-4587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of transfistular contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for branchial cleft fistulas (BCF), using surgical findings as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty - six patients were initially suspected of having BCF. Among them, 35 patients who underwent two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US), transfistular CEUS, and prior to surgery were retrospectively enrolled. The diagnostic accuracy of transfistular CEUS and 2D-US for BCF detection was compared. The agreement between CEUS and surgical findings in internal orifice localization and BCF classification was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the enrolled 35 patients, 29 were surgically confirmed as BCF. Postoperative surgical findings served as the reference standard for all analyses. Transfistular CEUS demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to 2D-US for BCF detection (91.4% vs. 82.9%). Excellent agreement was observed between CEUS and surgical findings in internal orifice localization (κ=0.814, p<0.001). For BCF classification, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of transfistular CEUS were as follows: type I BCF (93.1%, 93.8%, 92.3%), type II BCF (89.7%, 71.4%, 91.3%), and pyriform fossa fistulas (96.6%, 100.0%, and 95.7%), respectively.  Conclusions: As a radiation-free, cost-effective, and non-invasive technique, transfistular CEUS can accurately diagnose BCF, precisely localize its internal orifice, and effectively differentiate its subtypes. For patients clinically suspected of BCF, transfistular CEUS is a reliable preoperative tool for individualized clinical guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94138,"journal":{"name":"Medical ultrasonography","volume":" ","pages":"286-292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of transfistular contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for branchial cleft fistulas (BCF), using surgical findings as the reference standard.

Materials and methods: Fifty - six patients were initially suspected of having BCF. Among them, 35 patients who underwent two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US), transfistular CEUS, and prior to surgery were retrospectively enrolled. The diagnostic accuracy of transfistular CEUS and 2D-US for BCF detection was compared. The agreement between CEUS and surgical findings in internal orifice localization and BCF classification was assessed.

Results: Among the enrolled 35 patients, 29 were surgically confirmed as BCF. Postoperative surgical findings served as the reference standard for all analyses. Transfistular CEUS demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to 2D-US for BCF detection (91.4% vs. 82.9%). Excellent agreement was observed between CEUS and surgical findings in internal orifice localization (κ=0.814, p<0.001). For BCF classification, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of transfistular CEUS were as follows: type I BCF (93.1%, 93.8%, 92.3%), type II BCF (89.7%, 71.4%, 91.3%), and pyriform fossa fistulas (96.6%, 100.0%, and 95.7%), respectively.  Conclusions: As a radiation-free, cost-effective, and non-invasive technique, transfistular CEUS can accurately diagnose BCF, precisely localize its internal orifice, and effectively differentiate its subtypes. For patients clinically suspected of BCF, transfistular CEUS is a reliable preoperative tool for individualized clinical guidance.

经瘘管超声造影对鳃裂瘘的诊断价值。
目的:本研究旨在评价经瘘管造影增强超声(CEUS)对鳃裂瘘(BCF)的诊断价值,以手术表现为参考标准。材料和方法:56例患者最初被怀疑患有BCF。其中回顾性纳入35例手术前行二维超声(2D-US)、经瘘超声造影(CEUS)的患者。比较经瘘管超声造影与2D-US对BCF的诊断准确性。评估超声造影与手术结果在内孔定位和BCF分类上的一致性。结果:入选的35例患者中,29例手术确诊为BCF。术后手术结果作为所有分析的参考标准。与2D-US相比,经瘘管超声造影对BCF的诊断准确率更高(91.4%对82.9%)。超声造影结果与手术结果吻合良好(κ=0.814, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书