Structured telemonitoring reduces HbA1c and emergency visits in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a controlled cohort study in Ecuador's public hospital.

IF 3.5
Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare Pub Date : 2026-02-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1734589
Angel Santillán, Edwin Ivan Travez Proaño, Ivanna Noemí Jaramillo Encalada, Patricio Alejando Abril López, Jennifer Tricallotis, Jaime David Acosta-España
{"title":"Structured telemonitoring reduces HbA1c and emergency visits in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a controlled cohort study in Ecuador's public hospital.","authors":"Angel Santillán, Edwin Ivan Travez Proaño, Ivanna Noemí Jaramillo Encalada, Patricio Alejando Abril López, Jennifer Tricallotis, Jaime David Acosta-España","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1734589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has demonstrated potential to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet evidence from middle-income public health systems remains limited. This study evaluated the clinical impact of structured telemonitoring in insulin-treated T2DM patients at a public hospital in Ecuador.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, controlled cohort study was conducted over a six-month period. Adults with insulin-treated T2DM and baseline HbA1c >8% were assigned to structured telemonitoring or standard care. The intervention included Bluetooth-enabled glucometers linked to the mySugr app, automated data uploads, and weekly clinical review. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c; secondary outcomes included emergency visits and hospitalizations. Repeated measures ANOVA assessed HbA1c trajectories. Emergency visits were analyzed using Fisher's Exact Test and Firth's logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 100 patients (50 per group), mean HbA1c decreased by 2.67% in the intervention group compared to 1.38% in the control group (p = 0.006). Emergency visits occurred in eight control patients and none in the intervention group (p = 0.006). Firth's regression showed a non-significant odds ratio. No hospitalizations were reported. Direct cost savings totaled USD 9,660 over six months for the studied population and USD 174,000 annually, based on a 10% adoption rate (450 patients) over one year, using 2024 data from HGDC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structured telemonitoring was associated with improved glycemic control and reduced utilization of acute care services. These findings support RPM feasibility in middle-income public health settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":"7 ","pages":"1734589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1734589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has demonstrated potential to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet evidence from middle-income public health systems remains limited. This study evaluated the clinical impact of structured telemonitoring in insulin-treated T2DM patients at a public hospital in Ecuador.

Methods: A prospective, controlled cohort study was conducted over a six-month period. Adults with insulin-treated T2DM and baseline HbA1c >8% were assigned to structured telemonitoring or standard care. The intervention included Bluetooth-enabled glucometers linked to the mySugr app, automated data uploads, and weekly clinical review. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c; secondary outcomes included emergency visits and hospitalizations. Repeated measures ANOVA assessed HbA1c trajectories. Emergency visits were analyzed using Fisher's Exact Test and Firth's logistic regression.

Results: Among 100 patients (50 per group), mean HbA1c decreased by 2.67% in the intervention group compared to 1.38% in the control group (p = 0.006). Emergency visits occurred in eight control patients and none in the intervention group (p = 0.006). Firth's regression showed a non-significant odds ratio. No hospitalizations were reported. Direct cost savings totaled USD 9,660 over six months for the studied population and USD 174,000 annually, based on a 10% adoption rate (450 patients) over one year, using 2024 data from HGDC.

Conclusion: Structured telemonitoring was associated with improved glycemic control and reduced utilization of acute care services. These findings support RPM feasibility in middle-income public health settings.

结构化远程监测降低胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白和急诊次数:厄瓜多尔公立医院的一项对照队列研究
背景:远程患者监测(RPM)已被证明具有改善2型糖尿病(T2DM)血糖控制的潜力,但来自中等收入公共卫生系统的证据仍然有限。本研究评估了厄瓜多尔一家公立医院对胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者进行结构化远程监测的临床影响。方法:一项为期6个月的前瞻性对照队列研究。接受胰岛素治疗的T2DM患者和基线HbA1c为8%的患者被分配到结构化远程监测或标准护理组。干预措施包括连接到mysugar应用程序的蓝牙血糖仪、自动数据上传和每周临床检查。主要终点是HbA1c的变化;次要结局包括急诊和住院。重复测量方差分析评估HbA1c轨迹。使用Fisher精确检验和Firth逻辑回归分析急诊就诊情况。结果:100例患者(每组50例)中,干预组平均HbA1c降低2.67%,对照组平均HbA1c降低1.38% (p = 0.006)。对照组有8例患者急诊就诊,干预组无一例(p = 0.006)。Firth的回归显示一个不显著的优势比。没有住院的报告。根据HGDC的2024年数据,根据一年内10%的采用率(450名患者),研究人群在六个月内直接节省成本总计9,660美元,每年节省17.4万美元。结论:结构化远程监测与改善血糖控制和减少急性护理服务的利用率有关。这些发现支持RPM在中等收入公共卫生机构的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书