Biological and Mechanical Comparison of Eggshell-Derived Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Hydroxide, and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Australian Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-04 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1111/aej.70067
Makbule Buse Dundar Sari, Ayse Demiral, Mustafa Gungormus, Nurgul K. Bakirhan, Merve Aksoy
{"title":"Biological and Mechanical Comparison of Eggshell-Derived Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Hydroxide, and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate","authors":"Makbule Buse Dundar Sari,&nbsp;Ayse Demiral,&nbsp;Mustafa Gungormus,&nbsp;Nurgul K. Bakirhan,&nbsp;Merve Aksoy","doi":"10.1111/aej.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study compared the mechanical properties of eggshell-derived hydroxyapatite (ESDHA), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium hydroxide (CH), and evaluated their cytotoxicity using human dental pulp stem cells (HDPSCs). Cement samples were prepared and incubated at 37°C under humid conditions. Cytotoxicity was assessed using extracts collected at different setting periods, followed by real-time cell analysis. Compressive strength was measured at multiple time points. Structural and chemical characterisation was performed using X-ray diffractometry, Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy. ESDHA and MTA showed no cytotoxic effects, whereas CH exhibited initial cytotoxicity with a doubling time of 42.32 ± 1.69 h on day 1. MTA demonstrated the highest compressive strength (85.6 ± 3.2 MPa at 28 days), followed by ESDHA (18.9 ± 1.4 MPa), while CH had the lowest strength (5.1 ± 0.4 MPa). ESDHA appears to be a promising, cost-effective alternative with favourable cytocompatibility but requires mechanical improvement.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":"52 2","pages":"439-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.70067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the mechanical properties of eggshell-derived hydroxyapatite (ESDHA), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium hydroxide (CH), and evaluated their cytotoxicity using human dental pulp stem cells (HDPSCs). Cement samples were prepared and incubated at 37°C under humid conditions. Cytotoxicity was assessed using extracts collected at different setting periods, followed by real-time cell analysis. Compressive strength was measured at multiple time points. Structural and chemical characterisation was performed using X-ray diffractometry, Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy. ESDHA and MTA showed no cytotoxic effects, whereas CH exhibited initial cytotoxicity with a doubling time of 42.32 ± 1.69 h on day 1. MTA demonstrated the highest compressive strength (85.6 ± 3.2 MPa at 28 days), followed by ESDHA (18.9 ± 1.4 MPa), while CH had the lowest strength (5.1 ± 0.4 MPa). ESDHA appears to be a promising, cost-effective alternative with favourable cytocompatibility but requires mechanical improvement.

蛋壳衍生的羟基磷灰石、氢氧化钙和矿物三氧化物骨料的生物学和力学比较。
本研究比较了蛋壳衍生的羟基磷灰石(ESDHA)、矿物三氧化物聚集体(MTA)和氢氧化钙(CH)的力学性能,并利用人牙髓干细胞(HDPSCs)评估了它们的细胞毒性。制备水泥样品并在37°C潮湿条件下孵育。细胞毒性评估采用在不同设置周期收集的提取物,随后进行实时细胞分析。在多个时间点测量抗压强度。使用x射线衍射、拉曼光谱、扫描电子显微镜和能量色散光谱进行结构和化学表征。ESDHA和MTA没有细胞毒性作用,而CH在第1天表现出初始细胞毒性,时间为42.32±1.69 h。MTA 28天抗压强度最高(85.6±3.2 MPa), ESDHA次之(18.9±1.4 MPa), CH最低(5.1±0.4 MPa)。ESDHA似乎是一种有前途的、具有良好细胞相容性的成本效益的替代品,但需要机械改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Endodontic Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues. The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses. The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书