Causal deep learning to personalize medicine: Which intensive care patients with sepsis will benefit from corticosteroid therapy?

Journal of intensive medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jointm.2025.07.002
Ameet Jagesar , Louk Smalbil , Etienne Galea , Tristan Struja , Tariq Dam , Paul Hilders , Martijn Otten , Laurens Biesheuvel , Armand Girbes , Patrick Thoral , Mark Hoogendoorn , Paul Elbers
{"title":"Causal deep learning to personalize medicine: Which intensive care patients with sepsis will benefit from corticosteroid therapy?","authors":"Ameet Jagesar ,&nbsp;Louk Smalbil ,&nbsp;Etienne Galea ,&nbsp;Tristan Struja ,&nbsp;Tariq Dam ,&nbsp;Paul Hilders ,&nbsp;Martijn Otten ,&nbsp;Laurens Biesheuvel ,&nbsp;Armand Girbes ,&nbsp;Patrick Thoral ,&nbsp;Mark Hoogendoorn ,&nbsp;Paul Elbers","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to dysregulated host response to an infection, often requiring intensive care treatment. There is a strong rationale for the administration of corticosteroids for immunomodulation; however, clinical trials are inconclusive, which may be attributable to heterogeneity in therapeutic effects between individual patients. Leveraging deep learning within a causality framework, we aimed to identify for which intensive care patients with sepsis corticosteroids lead to improved survival.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We trained the treatment agnostic representation network (TARNet) to estimate the reduction in predicted probability of 28-day mortality following initiation of corticosteroid treatment of intensive care patients with sepsis. We used the freely available and public AmsterdamUMCdb ICU database for causal model development, considering 19 predictor variables from the first 24 h of admission, and validated the model with Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) version 2.2 data. A cut-off of 10% reduction in predicted probability of mortality was used to classify treatment responders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>According to the Sepsis-3 criteria, a total of 2920 admissions in AmsterdamUMCdb were eligible. Of these, 1378 were assigned to the intervention group and 1542 to the control group. Internal validation of predictions of the observed outcomes showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79, while external validation yielded an AUROC of 0.71. Covariate balance of the TARNet model latent representation, as measured by the Wasserstein distance, was 3.6 × 10⁻⁷ for the internal data set and 4.2 × 10⁻⁷ for the external data set. Based on the estimated reduction of predicted mortality, a distinction was made between treatment responders (<em>n</em>=245), non-responders (<em>n</em>=2098), and those predicted to be harmed by corticosteroid treatment (<em>n</em>=577).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Corticosteroid treatment responders were those with severe metabolic acidosis and impaired circulation, whereas patients who were less ill based on these parameters were more likely to have increased mortality rates by corticosteroid treatment. There was also a notable discrepancy between the model’s suggestions and the physicians’ treatment that was carried out, implying improvements in the clinical assessment of patients with sepsis are necessary. Given recent years have not yielded new treatments for sepsis, computational clinical decision-support systems are worth exploring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X25000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to dysregulated host response to an infection, often requiring intensive care treatment. There is a strong rationale for the administration of corticosteroids for immunomodulation; however, clinical trials are inconclusive, which may be attributable to heterogeneity in therapeutic effects between individual patients. Leveraging deep learning within a causality framework, we aimed to identify for which intensive care patients with sepsis corticosteroids lead to improved survival.

Methods

We trained the treatment agnostic representation network (TARNet) to estimate the reduction in predicted probability of 28-day mortality following initiation of corticosteroid treatment of intensive care patients with sepsis. We used the freely available and public AmsterdamUMCdb ICU database for causal model development, considering 19 predictor variables from the first 24 h of admission, and validated the model with Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) version 2.2 data. A cut-off of 10% reduction in predicted probability of mortality was used to classify treatment responders.

Results

According to the Sepsis-3 criteria, a total of 2920 admissions in AmsterdamUMCdb were eligible. Of these, 1378 were assigned to the intervention group and 1542 to the control group. Internal validation of predictions of the observed outcomes showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79, while external validation yielded an AUROC of 0.71. Covariate balance of the TARNet model latent representation, as measured by the Wasserstein distance, was 3.6 × 10⁻⁷ for the internal data set and 4.2 × 10⁻⁷ for the external data set. Based on the estimated reduction of predicted mortality, a distinction was made between treatment responders (n=245), non-responders (n=2098), and those predicted to be harmed by corticosteroid treatment (n=577).

Conclusions

Corticosteroid treatment responders were those with severe metabolic acidosis and impaired circulation, whereas patients who were less ill based on these parameters were more likely to have increased mortality rates by corticosteroid treatment. There was also a notable discrepancy between the model’s suggestions and the physicians’ treatment that was carried out, implying improvements in the clinical assessment of patients with sepsis are necessary. Given recent years have not yielded new treatments for sepsis, computational clinical decision-support systems are worth exploring.
因果深度学习个性化用药:哪些重症脓毒症患者将受益于皮质类固醇治疗?
背景:败血症,定义为由于宿主对感染反应失调而导致的危及生命的器官功能障碍,通常需要重症监护治疗。使用皮质类固醇进行免疫调节是有充分理由的;然而,临床试验尚无定论,这可能是由于个体患者之间治疗效果的异质性。利用因果关系框架内的深度学习,我们旨在确定哪些重症监护败血症患者使用皮质类固醇可以提高生存率。方法:我们训练治疗不可知表示网络(TARNet)来估计重症脓毒症患者开始皮质类固醇治疗后28天死亡率预测概率的降低。我们使用免费和公开的AmsterdamUMCdb ICU数据库进行因果模型的开发,考虑了入院前24小时的19个预测变量,并使用重症监护医疗信息市场(MIMIC-IV) 2.2版本的数据验证了模型。预测死亡率降低10%的截止值被用来对治疗反应进行分类。结果:根据脓毒症-3标准,阿姆斯特丹umcdb共有2920例入组患者符合标准。其中,1378人被分配到干预组,1542人被分配到对照组。观察结果预测的内部验证显示,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.79,而外部验证的AUROC为0.71。用Wasserstein距离测量的TARNet模型潜在表示的协变量平衡,对于内部数据集是3.6 × 10⁻⁷,对于外部数据集是4.2 × 10⁻⁷。基于预测死亡率的估计降低,对治疗有反应者(n=245)、无反应者(n=2098)和预计受到皮质类固醇治疗伤害的患者(n=577)进行了区分。结论:皮质类固醇治疗的应答者是那些严重代谢性酸中毒和循环受损的患者,而根据这些参数患病较少的患者更有可能增加皮质类固醇治疗的死亡率。模型的建议与医生的治疗也存在显著差异,这意味着需要改进对脓毒症患者的临床评估。鉴于近年来尚未产生新的败血症治疗方法,计算临床决策支持系统值得探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书