Pregabalin naproxencarbil in acute post-bunionectomy pain: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 4.3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2026-01-20 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001424
Guang-Liang Jiang, J Richard Evanson, Daneshvari Solanki, Dominick D'Aunno, Emanuel DeNoia, Juan Carlos Rondon, Alina Beaton, Louise Taber
{"title":"Pregabalin naproxencarbil in acute post-bunionectomy pain: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Guang-Liang Jiang, J Richard Evanson, Daneshvari Solanki, Dominick D'Aunno, Emanuel DeNoia, Juan Carlos Rondon, Alina Beaton, Louise Taber","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Practice guidelines recommend multimodal approaches for better management of acute pain including the administration of two or more drugs that act by different analgesic mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to assess pregabalin naproxencarbil (PNC), a new chemical entity targeting both nociceptive and neuropathic pain pathways, for the management of acute pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 450 participants scheduled for first metatarsal bunionectomy. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either 1250 mg or 750 mg of PNC or placebo. Study drug was administered 1 hour before surgery and thereafter every 12 hours for 72 hours. Participants reported numeric pain rating scale to calculate summed pain intensity (SPI). Rescue pain medication use and safety were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The least-squares mean (LSM) (SE) of SPI over 48 hours (SPI48) for the 1250 mg PNC group vs placebo as the primary efficacy end point was 132.6 (8.0) vs 286.0 (8.2) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). For the 750 mg group vs placebo as the key secondary efficacy end point, the LSM (SE) of SPI48 was 157.9 (8.3) vs 289.5 (8.5) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Rescue medication was spared by 42.8%, 33.6%, and 2.7% participants in the 1250 mg, 750 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for time to initiate rescue medication were 0.18 (0.14-0.25) for 1250 mg vs placebo and 0.24 (0.18-0.31) for 750 mg vs placebo. Tramadol consumption over 72 hours in the placebo was 4.1- or 3.0-fold higher than in the 1250 mg or 750 mg groups, and 3- or 2.5-fold higher with acetaminophen. Mild somnolence, dizziness, nausea, and constipation were more common in active groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregabalin naproxencarbil dose-dependently reduced acute postoperative pain with acceptable safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06017999.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"11 2","pages":"e1424"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12928910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Practice guidelines recommend multimodal approaches for better management of acute pain including the administration of two or more drugs that act by different analgesic mechanisms.

Objective: The study aimed to assess pregabalin naproxencarbil (PNC), a new chemical entity targeting both nociceptive and neuropathic pain pathways, for the management of acute pain.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 450 participants scheduled for first metatarsal bunionectomy. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either 1250 mg or 750 mg of PNC or placebo. Study drug was administered 1 hour before surgery and thereafter every 12 hours for 72 hours. Participants reported numeric pain rating scale to calculate summed pain intensity (SPI). Rescue pain medication use and safety were monitored.

Results: The least-squares mean (LSM) (SE) of SPI over 48 hours (SPI48) for the 1250 mg PNC group vs placebo as the primary efficacy end point was 132.6 (8.0) vs 286.0 (8.2) (P < 0.0001). For the 750 mg group vs placebo as the key secondary efficacy end point, the LSM (SE) of SPI48 was 157.9 (8.3) vs 289.5 (8.5) (P < 0.0001). Rescue medication was spared by 42.8%, 33.6%, and 2.7% participants in the 1250 mg, 750 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for time to initiate rescue medication were 0.18 (0.14-0.25) for 1250 mg vs placebo and 0.24 (0.18-0.31) for 750 mg vs placebo. Tramadol consumption over 72 hours in the placebo was 4.1- or 3.0-fold higher than in the 1250 mg or 750 mg groups, and 3- or 2.5-fold higher with acetaminophen. Mild somnolence, dizziness, nausea, and constipation were more common in active groups.

Conclusion: Pregabalin naproxencarbil dose-dependently reduced acute postoperative pain with acceptable safety profiles.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06017999.

普瑞巴林萘普生卡比尔治疗拇囊炎切除术后急性疼痛:一项随机临床试验。
导言:实践指南推荐采用多模式治疗急性疼痛,包括使用两种或两种以上不同镇痛机制的药物。目的:研究普瑞巴林萘普生卡比尔(PNC)作为一种同时靶向伤害性和神经性疼痛通路的新型化学实体,对急性疼痛的治疗效果。方法:这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验招募了450名计划进行首次跖骨囊炎切除术的参与者。参与者随机(1:1:1)接受1250mg或750mg PNC或安慰剂。术前1小时给药,术后每12小时给药一次,共72小时。参与者报告数字疼痛评定量表来计算总疼痛强度(SPI)。监测救援止痛药的使用和安全性。结果:作为主要疗效终点,1250 mg PNC组与安慰剂组48小时SPI (SPI48)的最小二乘平均值(LSM) (SE)为132.6(8.0)比286.0 (8.2)(P < 0.0001)。750 mg组与安慰剂组作为关键的次要疗效终点,SPI48的LSM (SE)为157.9 (8.3)vs 289.5 (8.5) (P < 0.0001)。在1250毫克、750毫克和安慰剂组中,分别有42.8%、33.6%和2.7%的参与者没有使用救援药物。1250 mg与安慰剂相比,开始抢救药物治疗时间的风险比(95%置信区间)为0.18 (0.14-0.25),750 mg与安慰剂相比,风险比为0.24(0.18-0.31)。在72小时内,安慰剂组曲马多的消耗量比1250毫克或750毫克组高4.1或3.0倍,对乙酰氨基酚组高3或2.5倍。轻度嗜睡、头晕、恶心和便秘在运动组中更为常见。结论:普瑞巴林萘普生卡比尔剂量依赖性减轻术后急性疼痛,安全性可接受。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06017999。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书