On sensory similarities

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2026.104019
Charles Spence , Nicola Di Stefano
{"title":"On sensory similarities","authors":"Charles Spence ,&nbsp;Nicola Di Stefano","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Similarity has been a central concern for millennia, drawing the attention of philosophers, scientists, and artists. The issue of similarity is especially intriguing in the domain of the senses (and of sensory perception), where considerable research effort has been devoted to describing the affinities and divergences between different sensory modalities. In this work, we critically review the multiple different ways in which ‘sensory similarity’ has been theorized, highlighting how the similarities and analogies that researchers have proposed between the senses tend to constrain the theorization about how the senses operate. Similarities between different pairs of senses have been identified at multiple levels including in terms of stimuli/energy, transduction mechanisms, information-processing, synthetic/analytic analysis, perceptual organization, similarity of structure of the sensory space, and/or of the temporal evolution of different kinds of sensations. Based on the reviewed evidence, we propose an integrated framework, suggesting that sensory similarity can be understood as arising from (i) shared phenomenal qualities, (ii) analogous structural or organizational patterns, or (iii) convergent affective or semantic meanings, each grounded in increasingly cognitive and culturally-mediated processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810026000279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Similarity has been a central concern for millennia, drawing the attention of philosophers, scientists, and artists. The issue of similarity is especially intriguing in the domain of the senses (and of sensory perception), where considerable research effort has been devoted to describing the affinities and divergences between different sensory modalities. In this work, we critically review the multiple different ways in which ‘sensory similarity’ has been theorized, highlighting how the similarities and analogies that researchers have proposed between the senses tend to constrain the theorization about how the senses operate. Similarities between different pairs of senses have been identified at multiple levels including in terms of stimuli/energy, transduction mechanisms, information-processing, synthetic/analytic analysis, perceptual organization, similarity of structure of the sensory space, and/or of the temporal evolution of different kinds of sensations. Based on the reviewed evidence, we propose an integrated framework, suggesting that sensory similarity can be understood as arising from (i) shared phenomenal qualities, (ii) analogous structural or organizational patterns, or (iii) convergent affective or semantic meanings, each grounded in increasingly cognitive and culturally-mediated processes.
关于感官相似性。
几千年来,相似性一直是人们关注的焦点,引起了哲学家、科学家和艺术家的注意。在感官(和感官知觉)领域,相似性的问题尤其有趣,在这个领域,大量的研究工作致力于描述不同感官模式之间的亲和和分歧。在这项工作中,我们批判性地回顾了“感官相似性”被理论化的多种不同方式,强调了研究人员在感官之间提出的相似性和相似性如何限制了关于感官如何运作的理论化。不同感觉对之间在刺激/能量、转导机制、信息处理、综合/分析分析、感知组织、感觉空间结构的相似性和/或不同类型感觉的时间演化等多个层面上的相似性已被确定。基于所审查的证据,我们提出了一个综合框架,表明感官相似性可以理解为(i)共同的现象品质,(ii)类似的结构或组织模式,或(iii)趋同的情感或语义,每一个都基于越来越多的认知和文化中介过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书