{"title":"On sensory similarities","authors":"Charles Spence , Nicola Di Stefano","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2026.104019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Similarity has been a central concern for millennia, drawing the attention of philosophers, scientists, and artists. The issue of similarity is especially intriguing in the domain of the senses (and of sensory perception), where considerable research effort has been devoted to describing the affinities and divergences between different sensory modalities. In this work, we critically review the multiple different ways in which ‘sensory similarity’ has been theorized, highlighting how the similarities and analogies that researchers have proposed between the senses tend to constrain the theorization about how the senses operate. Similarities between different pairs of senses have been identified at multiple levels including in terms of stimuli/energy, transduction mechanisms, information-processing, synthetic/analytic analysis, perceptual organization, similarity of structure of the sensory space, and/or of the temporal evolution of different kinds of sensations. Based on the reviewed evidence, we propose an integrated framework, suggesting that sensory similarity can be understood as arising from (i) shared phenomenal qualities, (ii) analogous structural or organizational patterns, or (iii) convergent affective or semantic meanings, each grounded in increasingly cognitive and culturally-mediated processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810026000279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Similarity has been a central concern for millennia, drawing the attention of philosophers, scientists, and artists. The issue of similarity is especially intriguing in the domain of the senses (and of sensory perception), where considerable research effort has been devoted to describing the affinities and divergences between different sensory modalities. In this work, we critically review the multiple different ways in which ‘sensory similarity’ has been theorized, highlighting how the similarities and analogies that researchers have proposed between the senses tend to constrain the theorization about how the senses operate. Similarities between different pairs of senses have been identified at multiple levels including in terms of stimuli/energy, transduction mechanisms, information-processing, synthetic/analytic analysis, perceptual organization, similarity of structure of the sensory space, and/or of the temporal evolution of different kinds of sensations. Based on the reviewed evidence, we propose an integrated framework, suggesting that sensory similarity can be understood as arising from (i) shared phenomenal qualities, (ii) analogous structural or organizational patterns, or (iii) convergent affective or semantic meanings, each grounded in increasingly cognitive and culturally-mediated processes.
期刊介绍:
Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.