Understanding the factors influencing participant engagement and adherence in exercise referral in the City of Manchester.

IF 3.2 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2025-003157
Matthew Sharp, Craig Jones, Zoë A Marshall, Stefan Birkett, Nigel Timothy Cable, Amy E Harwood
{"title":"Understanding the factors influencing participant engagement and adherence in exercise referral in the City of Manchester.","authors":"Matthew Sharp, Craig Jones, Zoë A Marshall, Stefan Birkett, Nigel Timothy Cable, Amy E Harwood","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-003157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify demographic, clinical, socioeconomic and referral-pathway determinants of engagement, early dropout and non-participation in a large metropolitan exercise referral scheme (ERS), and to assess whether machine learning (ML) methods provide additional explanatory value beyond conventional regression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analysed data from 11 909 adults (≥18 years) referred for ERS in Manchester, UK, between 27 January 2022 and 28 February 2025. Outcomes were programme adherence (completion of ≥12 exercise sessions), early dropout and non-participation. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine predictors of outcomes. ML methods, including Random Forest models and k-means clustering, were applied to assess predictive performance, rank feature importance and identify participant subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 11 909 referrals, 34.6% completed the programme, 34.2% declined to participate and 8.0% left early. Younger age, higher neighbourhood deprivation and psychosocial referral reasons (eg, loneliness, long covid) were associated with lower completion. Participants referred through outreach/social prescribing pathways were substantially more likely to remain in an 'intends to participate' state rather than complete, compared with those referred through clinical pathways. Random Forest models demonstrated good predictive accuracy, with early engagement indicators and deprivation emerging as the strongest predictors. Clustering identified a high-risk subgroup characterised by younger age, higher deprivation and low early attendance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engagement and adherence in ERS were strongly shaped by early engagement, deprivation, age and referral pathways. ML methods identified high-risk subgroups and reinforced the importance of early attendance. Targeted early support and ML-informed risk indicators may improve retention, particularly among younger and more deprived participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"e003157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2025-003157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify demographic, clinical, socioeconomic and referral-pathway determinants of engagement, early dropout and non-participation in a large metropolitan exercise referral scheme (ERS), and to assess whether machine learning (ML) methods provide additional explanatory value beyond conventional regression.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed data from 11 909 adults (≥18 years) referred for ERS in Manchester, UK, between 27 January 2022 and 28 February 2025. Outcomes were programme adherence (completion of ≥12 exercise sessions), early dropout and non-participation. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine predictors of outcomes. ML methods, including Random Forest models and k-means clustering, were applied to assess predictive performance, rank feature importance and identify participant subgroups.

Results: Of 11 909 referrals, 34.6% completed the programme, 34.2% declined to participate and 8.0% left early. Younger age, higher neighbourhood deprivation and psychosocial referral reasons (eg, loneliness, long covid) were associated with lower completion. Participants referred through outreach/social prescribing pathways were substantially more likely to remain in an 'intends to participate' state rather than complete, compared with those referred through clinical pathways. Random Forest models demonstrated good predictive accuracy, with early engagement indicators and deprivation emerging as the strongest predictors. Clustering identified a high-risk subgroup characterised by younger age, higher deprivation and low early attendance.

Conclusions: Engagement and adherence in ERS were strongly shaped by early engagement, deprivation, age and referral pathways. ML methods identified high-risk subgroups and reinforced the importance of early attendance. Targeted early support and ML-informed risk indicators may improve retention, particularly among younger and more deprived participants.

了解曼彻斯特市运动转诊中影响参与者参与和依从性的因素。
目的:确定参与、早期辍学和不参与大型都市运动推荐计划(ERS)的人口统计学、临床、社会经济和转诊途径决定因素,并评估机器学习(ML)方法是否提供了传统回归之外的额外解释价值。方法:这项回顾性队列研究分析了2022年1月27日至2025年2月28日期间在英国曼彻斯特转诊的11909名成人(≥18岁)的数据。结果为方案依从性(完成≥12次锻炼)、早期退出和不参与。使用多项逻辑回归检查结果的预测因子。ML方法,包括随机森林模型和k-means聚类,用于评估预测性能,对特征重要性进行排序并识别参与者子组。结果:在11909名转诊患者中,34.6%的人完成了项目,34.2%的人拒绝参加,8.0%的人提前退出。年龄更小、社区剥夺程度更高和心理社会转诊原因(如孤独、长期covid)与较低的完成率相关。与通过临床途径转介的参与者相比,通过外展/社会处方途径转介的参与者更有可能保持“有意参与”状态,而不是完全参与。随机森林模型显示出良好的预测准确性,早期参与指标和剥夺是最强的预测指标。聚类确定了一个高风险亚组,其特征是年龄更小,剥夺程度更高,早期出勤率低。结论:ERS的参与和依从性受到早期参与、剥夺、年龄和转诊途径的强烈影响。ML方法确定了高危亚组,并强调了早期出勤的重要性。有针对性的早期支持和ml知情风险指标可以提高保留率,特别是在年轻和更贫困的参与者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书