Conversion Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Critical Benchmark.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jens Schwarz, Charlotte Reithmann, Martin Rothe, Hans-Dieter Allescher, Holger Vogelsang
{"title":"Conversion Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Critical Benchmark.","authors":"Jens Schwarz, Charlotte Reithmann, Martin Rothe, Hans-Dieter Allescher, Holger Vogelsang","doi":"10.1177/10926429261421340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy is associated with increased morbidity. A low conversion rate, together with a low complication rate, may serve as a surrogate marker of surgical quality. This study aimed to analyze the conversion rate at a secondary referral center in relation to bile duct injuries and to identify risk factors associated with conversion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of all laparoscopically initiated cholecystectomies between January 2013 and December 2022. Demographic and clinical data, surgical indication, timing, difficulty level (Nassar and Randhawa scores), conversion rates, and bile duct injuries (Neuhaus system) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1534 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. The overall conversion rate was 2.0% (<i>n</i> = 31), with 84% of conversions occurring in emergency cases. Converted patients showed a high prevalence of known risk factors. Most converted cholecystectomies (80.6%) were performed during daytime hours; only 6.5% of conversions occurred after midnight. The incidence of bile duct injuries was 0.26%, well below the average reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low conversion rate combined with a low rate of bile duct injuries can serve as a surgical quality indicator. Risk stratification using established scoring systems, laparoscopic skills such as intraoperative cholangiography, appropriate timing of surgery, and team composition may contribute to achieving a low conversion rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"356-359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261421340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy is associated with increased morbidity. A low conversion rate, together with a low complication rate, may serve as a surrogate marker of surgical quality. This study aimed to analyze the conversion rate at a secondary referral center in relation to bile duct injuries and to identify risk factors associated with conversion.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all laparoscopically initiated cholecystectomies between January 2013 and December 2022. Demographic and clinical data, surgical indication, timing, difficulty level (Nassar and Randhawa scores), conversion rates, and bile duct injuries (Neuhaus system) were evaluated.

Results: A total of 1534 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. The overall conversion rate was 2.0% (n = 31), with 84% of conversions occurring in emergency cases. Converted patients showed a high prevalence of known risk factors. Most converted cholecystectomies (80.6%) were performed during daytime hours; only 6.5% of conversions occurred after midnight. The incidence of bile duct injuries was 0.26%, well below the average reported in the literature.

Conclusion: A low conversion rate combined with a low rate of bile duct injuries can serve as a surgical quality indicator. Risk stratification using established scoring systems, laparoscopic skills such as intraoperative cholangiography, appropriate timing of surgery, and team composition may contribute to achieving a low conversion rate.

腹腔镜胆囊切除术的转换率是一个关键的基准。
背景:从腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开放式胆囊切除术与发病率增加有关。低转换率和低并发症率可以作为手术质量的替代指标。本研究旨在分析二级转诊中心与胆管损伤相关的转诊率,并确定与转诊相关的危险因素。方法:我们对2013年1月至2022年12月期间所有腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行回顾性分析。评估人口统计学和临床资料、手术指征、时机、难度等级(Nassar和Randhawa评分)、转换率和胆管损伤(Neuhaus系统)。结果:共施行腹腔镜胆囊切除术1534例。总转换率为2.0% (n = 31), 84%的转换率发生在紧急情况下。转化患者显示出已知危险因素的高患病率。大部分胆囊切除术(80.6%)在白天进行;只有6.5%的转换发生在午夜之后。胆管损伤发生率为0.26%,远低于文献报道的平均水平。结论:低转换率结合低胆管损伤率可作为手术质量指标。采用已建立的评分系统、腹腔镜技术(如术中胆管造影)、适当的手术时机和团队组成进行风险分层可能有助于实现低转换率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书