Normative Ranges for Wideband Middle Ear Muscle Reflex Magnitude: Limited Potential for Diagnosing Cochlear Deafferentation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
American Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2026-06-02 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00241
Naomi F Bramhall, Garnett P McMillan, Sean D Kampel, Anne E Heassler, Nicole K Whittle, Haley A Szabo
{"title":"Normative Ranges for Wideband Middle Ear Muscle Reflex Magnitude: Limited Potential for Diagnosing Cochlear Deafferentation.","authors":"Naomi F Bramhall, Garnett P McMillan, Sean D Kampel, Anne E Heassler, Nicole K Whittle, Haley A Szabo","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear synaptopathy, the loss of the synapses between the inner hair cells and their auditory nerve fiber targets, is expected to be a common type of auditory deficit resulting from noise exposure or aging. Unfortunately, there is currently no means for diagnosing cochlear synaptopathy or other forms of cochlear deafferentation. Wideband middle ear muscle reflexes (MEMRs) have been proposed as a potential diagnostic indicator of cochlear deafferentation, but we lack normative ranges for MEMR magnitude. The objective of this study was to develop normative ranges for wideband MEMR magnitude that can be used to identify patients with abnormally weak MEMRs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Normative ranges were generated for ipsilateral and contralateral wideband MEMR magnitude in a population at low risk for cochlear synaptopathy due to young age, normal hearing thresholds, and minimal noise exposure history. The normative ranges were statistically adjusted for average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels to account for possible impacts of outer hair cell dysfunction. To evaluate the ability of the normative ranges to differentiate between populations at low versus high risk of synaptopathy, measurements were also collected from military Veterans with normal hearing thresholds who reported at least one of the auditory complaints predicted to result from synaptopathy-tinnitus, speech perception in noise difficulty, or decreased sound tolerance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For individuals with poorer DPOAEs, it is not possible to fall below the lower bounds of the wideband MEMR normative ranges. For individuals with more robust DPOAEs, the lower bounds are very close to an MEMR magnitude indicating an absent reflex. Few individuals from the high-risk sample fell below the normative ranges, suggesting that these normative ranges do not identify significant cochlear deafferentation as expected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wideband MEMR magnitude normative ranges will not be effective as a stand-alone indicator of cochlear deafferentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"457-471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cochlear synaptopathy, the loss of the synapses between the inner hair cells and their auditory nerve fiber targets, is expected to be a common type of auditory deficit resulting from noise exposure or aging. Unfortunately, there is currently no means for diagnosing cochlear synaptopathy or other forms of cochlear deafferentation. Wideband middle ear muscle reflexes (MEMRs) have been proposed as a potential diagnostic indicator of cochlear deafferentation, but we lack normative ranges for MEMR magnitude. The objective of this study was to develop normative ranges for wideband MEMR magnitude that can be used to identify patients with abnormally weak MEMRs.

Method: Normative ranges were generated for ipsilateral and contralateral wideband MEMR magnitude in a population at low risk for cochlear synaptopathy due to young age, normal hearing thresholds, and minimal noise exposure history. The normative ranges were statistically adjusted for average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels to account for possible impacts of outer hair cell dysfunction. To evaluate the ability of the normative ranges to differentiate between populations at low versus high risk of synaptopathy, measurements were also collected from military Veterans with normal hearing thresholds who reported at least one of the auditory complaints predicted to result from synaptopathy-tinnitus, speech perception in noise difficulty, or decreased sound tolerance.

Results: For individuals with poorer DPOAEs, it is not possible to fall below the lower bounds of the wideband MEMR normative ranges. For individuals with more robust DPOAEs, the lower bounds are very close to an MEMR magnitude indicating an absent reflex. Few individuals from the high-risk sample fell below the normative ranges, suggesting that these normative ranges do not identify significant cochlear deafferentation as expected.

Conclusion: Wideband MEMR magnitude normative ranges will not be effective as a stand-alone indicator of cochlear deafferentation.

宽频带中耳肌肉反射强度的标准范围:诊断耳蜗传入障碍的有限潜力。
目的:耳蜗突触病是指内耳毛细胞与其听神经纤维目标之间的突触的丧失,被认为是一种常见的由噪声暴露或衰老引起的听觉缺陷。不幸的是,目前没有办法诊断耳蜗突触病或其他形式的耳蜗传入障碍。宽带中耳肌肉反射(MEMRs)被认为是耳蜗传入障碍的一个潜在的诊断指标,但我们对MEMR的大小缺乏规范的范围。本研究的目的是制定宽带MEMR大小的规范范围,可用于识别异常弱的MEMR患者。方法:对年龄小、听力阈值正常、噪音暴露史小、耳蜗突触病风险低的人群进行同侧和对侧宽带MEMR幅度的标准范围测定。标准范围根据平均失真产物耳声发射(DPOAE)水平进行统计调整,以考虑外毛细胞功能障碍的可能影响。为了评估标准范围区分突触病低风险人群和高风险人群的能力,还收集了听力阈值正常的退伍军人的测量数据,这些退伍军人报告了至少一种由突触病-耳鸣、噪音困难中的言语感知或声音耐受能力下降引起的听觉抱怨。结果:对于dpoae较差的个体,不可能低于宽带MEMR规范范围的下界。对于dpoae较强的个体,下界非常接近表明反射缺失的MEMR幅度。高风险样本中很少有个体低于标准范围,这表明这些标准范围不能像预期的那样识别显著的耳蜗脱耳。结论:宽带MEMR大小标准范围不能作为耳蜗传入障碍的独立指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书