Naomi F Bramhall, Garnett P McMillan, Sean D Kampel, Anne E Heassler, Nicole K Whittle, Haley A Szabo
{"title":"Normative Ranges for Wideband Middle Ear Muscle Reflex Magnitude: Limited Potential for Diagnosing Cochlear Deafferentation.","authors":"Naomi F Bramhall, Garnett P McMillan, Sean D Kampel, Anne E Heassler, Nicole K Whittle, Haley A Szabo","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear synaptopathy, the loss of the synapses between the inner hair cells and their auditory nerve fiber targets, is expected to be a common type of auditory deficit resulting from noise exposure or aging. Unfortunately, there is currently no means for diagnosing cochlear synaptopathy or other forms of cochlear deafferentation. Wideband middle ear muscle reflexes (MEMRs) have been proposed as a potential diagnostic indicator of cochlear deafferentation, but we lack normative ranges for MEMR magnitude. The objective of this study was to develop normative ranges for wideband MEMR magnitude that can be used to identify patients with abnormally weak MEMRs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Normative ranges were generated for ipsilateral and contralateral wideband MEMR magnitude in a population at low risk for cochlear synaptopathy due to young age, normal hearing thresholds, and minimal noise exposure history. The normative ranges were statistically adjusted for average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels to account for possible impacts of outer hair cell dysfunction. To evaluate the ability of the normative ranges to differentiate between populations at low versus high risk of synaptopathy, measurements were also collected from military Veterans with normal hearing thresholds who reported at least one of the auditory complaints predicted to result from synaptopathy-tinnitus, speech perception in noise difficulty, or decreased sound tolerance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For individuals with poorer DPOAEs, it is not possible to fall below the lower bounds of the wideband MEMR normative ranges. For individuals with more robust DPOAEs, the lower bounds are very close to an MEMR magnitude indicating an absent reflex. Few individuals from the high-risk sample fell below the normative ranges, suggesting that these normative ranges do not identify significant cochlear deafferentation as expected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wideband MEMR magnitude normative ranges will not be effective as a stand-alone indicator of cochlear deafferentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"457-471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Cochlear synaptopathy, the loss of the synapses between the inner hair cells and their auditory nerve fiber targets, is expected to be a common type of auditory deficit resulting from noise exposure or aging. Unfortunately, there is currently no means for diagnosing cochlear synaptopathy or other forms of cochlear deafferentation. Wideband middle ear muscle reflexes (MEMRs) have been proposed as a potential diagnostic indicator of cochlear deafferentation, but we lack normative ranges for MEMR magnitude. The objective of this study was to develop normative ranges for wideband MEMR magnitude that can be used to identify patients with abnormally weak MEMRs.
Method: Normative ranges were generated for ipsilateral and contralateral wideband MEMR magnitude in a population at low risk for cochlear synaptopathy due to young age, normal hearing thresholds, and minimal noise exposure history. The normative ranges were statistically adjusted for average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels to account for possible impacts of outer hair cell dysfunction. To evaluate the ability of the normative ranges to differentiate between populations at low versus high risk of synaptopathy, measurements were also collected from military Veterans with normal hearing thresholds who reported at least one of the auditory complaints predicted to result from synaptopathy-tinnitus, speech perception in noise difficulty, or decreased sound tolerance.
Results: For individuals with poorer DPOAEs, it is not possible to fall below the lower bounds of the wideband MEMR normative ranges. For individuals with more robust DPOAEs, the lower bounds are very close to an MEMR magnitude indicating an absent reflex. Few individuals from the high-risk sample fell below the normative ranges, suggesting that these normative ranges do not identify significant cochlear deafferentation as expected.
Conclusion: Wideband MEMR magnitude normative ranges will not be effective as a stand-alone indicator of cochlear deafferentation.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.