Acute effects of medium-frequency electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility in athletes with an acute hamstring injury: A randomized controlled trial

IF 3.1 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Medicine and Health Science Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1016/j.smhs.2025.05.001
Anna Kelli , Thomas Apostolou , Paris Iakovidis , Georgios Koutras , Eleftherios Kellis
{"title":"Acute effects of medium-frequency electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility in athletes with an acute hamstring injury: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Anna Kelli ,&nbsp;Thomas Apostolou ,&nbsp;Paris Iakovidis ,&nbsp;Georgios Koutras ,&nbsp;Eleftherios Kellis","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compared the acute effects of electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility after a hamstring injury. Young athletes received either a 20 ​min TECAR (<em>n</em> = ​24) or TENS (<em>n</em> ​= ​26) session within 5 days following a hamstring injury, while the control (CON, <em>n</em> ​= ​25) group was instructed to rest. Visual analogue scale (VAS), functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries (FASH), straight leg raise test (SLR), and sit-and-reach scores (STR) were obtained prior to, immediately, 24, and 48 ​h after therapy. Group differences were detected after therapy in VAS and FASH scores (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). Compared to pre-therapy measurements, VAS scores showed a greater decrease in the TECAR group (−38.75% to −63.33%) than in the TENS group (−16.67% to −25.00%) and both were greater than in the CON group (−2.81% to −9.81%) (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). The TECAR group improved FASH scores (28.57%–48.21%) more than the TENS group (15.89%–27.79%) and both groups more than the CON group (0%–8.33%) (<em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). The increase in SLR and STR was greater in the TECAR group (6.26%–13.96%) than in the TENS (1.72%–9.53%) and CON groups (0%–3.03%). These results suggest that in the acute phase of hamstring injury, the use of TECAR and, to a lesser extent, TENS may relieve pain symptoms and bring some improvements in flexibility more than instructing patients to rest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 210-218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337625000630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the acute effects of electrical energy transfer (TECAR) and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) on pain and flexibility after a hamstring injury. Young athletes received either a 20 ​min TECAR (n = ​24) or TENS (n ​= ​26) session within 5 days following a hamstring injury, while the control (CON, n ​= ​25) group was instructed to rest. Visual analogue scale (VAS), functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries (FASH), straight leg raise test (SLR), and sit-and-reach scores (STR) were obtained prior to, immediately, 24, and 48 ​h after therapy. Group differences were detected after therapy in VAS and FASH scores (p ​< ​0.05). Compared to pre-therapy measurements, VAS scores showed a greater decrease in the TECAR group (−38.75% to −63.33%) than in the TENS group (−16.67% to −25.00%) and both were greater than in the CON group (−2.81% to −9.81%) (p ​< ​0.05). The TECAR group improved FASH scores (28.57%–48.21%) more than the TENS group (15.89%–27.79%) and both groups more than the CON group (0%–8.33%) (p ​< ​0.05). The increase in SLR and STR was greater in the TECAR group (6.26%–13.96%) than in the TENS (1.72%–9.53%) and CON groups (0%–3.03%). These results suggest that in the acute phase of hamstring injury, the use of TECAR and, to a lesser extent, TENS may relieve pain symptoms and bring some improvements in flexibility more than instructing patients to rest.
中频电能转移(TECAR)和经皮神经电刺激(TENS)对急性腘绳肌损伤运动员疼痛和柔韧性的急性影响:一项随机对照试验。
本研究比较了电能量转移(TECAR)和经皮电刺激(TENS)对腘绳肌损伤后疼痛和柔韧性的急性影响。年轻运动员在腿筋受伤后5天内接受20分钟的TECAR (n = 24)或TENS (n = 26)训练,而对照组(n = 25)则被要求休息。分别在治疗前、治疗后立即、治疗后24和48 h进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)、急性腘绳肌损伤功能评定量表(FASH)、直腿抬高测试(SLR)和坐伸评分(STR)。治疗后VAS评分、FASH评分组间比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与治疗前比较,TECAR组VAS评分下降幅度(-38.75%至-63.33%)大于TENS组(-16.67%至-25.00%),且均大于CON组(-2.81%至-9.81%)(p < 0.05)。TECAR组改善FASH评分(28.57% ~ 48.21%)高于TENS组(15.89% ~ 27.79%),两组均高于CON组(0% ~ 8.33%)(p < 0.05)。TECAR组SLR和STR的升高(6.26% ~ 13.96%)高于TENS组(1.72% ~ 9.53%)和CON组(0% ~ 3.03%)。这些结果表明,在腘绳肌损伤的急性期,使用TECAR和在较小程度上使用TENS比指导患者休息更能缓解疼痛症状并改善灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书