[Personality in psychosis: clinically relevant? Links with clinical insight and symptom distress].

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2026-01-01
A N Scholte-Stalenhoef, L L Boyette, G H M Pijnenborg
{"title":"[Personality in psychosis: clinically relevant? Links with clinical insight and symptom distress].","authors":"A N Scholte-Stalenhoef, L L Boyette, G H M Pijnenborg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the relationship of Five-Factor Model (FFM) personality and therapeutically relevant variables in psychosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the relationship between personality traits and both clinical insight and distress due to (subclinical) positive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) study were analyzed. Associations between patients&rsquo; personality traits and clinical insight was examined using multiple regression. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between personality and symptom-related distress in patients, their siblings, and controls. All analyses controlled for symptom levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater self-reported insight was associated with higher agreeableness, higher neuroticism, lower extraversion, and greater severity of depressive symptoms. Researcher-rated insight was only related to symptom severity, as were changes in insight over time for both forms of insight. Higher openness was associated with a weaker relationship between the frequency of (subclinical) positive symptoms and symptom-related distress in both patients and siblings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FFM personality traits are associated with both clinical insight and positive symptom distress, independently of symptom severity. In clinical practice, personality and symptoms are difficult to distinguish. This supports the use of integrated, personalized treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"68 2","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the relationship of Five-Factor Model (FFM) personality and therapeutically relevant variables in psychosis.

Aim: To examine the relationship between personality traits and both clinical insight and distress due to (subclinical) positive symptoms.

Method: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) study were analyzed. Associations between patients’ personality traits and clinical insight was examined using multiple regression. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between personality and symptom-related distress in patients, their siblings, and controls. All analyses controlled for symptom levels.

Results: Greater self-reported insight was associated with higher agreeableness, higher neuroticism, lower extraversion, and greater severity of depressive symptoms. Researcher-rated insight was only related to symptom severity, as were changes in insight over time for both forms of insight. Higher openness was associated with a weaker relationship between the frequency of (subclinical) positive symptoms and symptom-related distress in both patients and siblings.

Conclusion: FFM personality traits are associated with both clinical insight and positive symptom distress, independently of symptom severity. In clinical practice, personality and symptoms are difficult to distinguish. This supports the use of integrated, personalized treatment approaches.

精神病的人格:临床相关吗?与临床洞察力和症状困扰的联系]。
背景:五因素模型(FFM)人格与精神病治疗相关变量的关系尚不清楚。目的:探讨人格特质与临床洞察力和(亚临床)阳性症状引起的痛苦之间的关系。方法:对精神病遗传风险与转归(GROUP)研究的横断面和纵向资料进行分析。采用多元回归检验患者人格特质与临床洞察力之间的关系。采用Logistic回归来评估患者、其兄弟姐妹和对照组的人格与症状相关困扰之间的关系。所有的分析都控制了症状水平。结果:更大的自我报告洞察力与更高的亲和性、更高的神经质、更低的外向性和更严重的抑郁症状相关。研究者评价的洞察力只与症状严重程度有关,两种形式的洞察力随时间的变化也是如此。开放性越高,患者及其兄弟姐妹出现(亚临床)阳性症状的频率与症状相关困扰之间的关系越弱。结论:FFM人格特质与临床洞察力和阳性症状困扰相关,与症状严重程度无关。在临床实践中,人格和症状很难区分。这支持使用综合的、个性化的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书