Bayesian statistics: a primer for perioperative medicine clinicians.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Guido Mazzinari, Fernando G Zampieri, Michael O Harhay, Marcus J Schultz, David M van Meenen, Ary Serpa-Neto
{"title":"Bayesian statistics: a primer for perioperative medicine clinicians.","authors":"Guido Mazzinari, Fernando G Zampieri, Michael O Harhay, Marcus J Schultz, David M van Meenen, Ary Serpa-Neto","doi":"10.1186/s13741-026-00659-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bayesian methods offer an intuitive and coherent statistical framework for updating probabilistic beliefs by integrating prior knowledge-whether from existing data or expert consensus-with new evidence via likelihood functions to generate posterior probability distributions. This approach yields clinically meaningful outputs, such as credible intervals and probabilities of treatment benefit, and can incorporate thresholds relevant to practice, like the region of practical equivalence (ROPE). Recent advances in computation-including Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithms, and probabilistic programming languages like Stan and JAGS- have made Bayesian approaches feasible even for complex hierarchical models. In perioperative medicine, these methods are particularly valuable for (1) complementing trial results by quantifying clinically important effects in the context of statistically nonsignificant findings or modest probabilities of benefit despite statistical significance, (2) enhancing meta-analyses through coherent integration of heterogeneous studies and sparse data, and (3) enabling adaptive and platform trial designs through continuous evidence synthesis. The ability to incorporate informative priors can complement existing knowledge, especially in small-sample studies, which are common in perioperative medicine, where traditional approaches provide insufficient precision. Although concerns remain regarding subjectivity in prior specification, these are increasingly addressed through structured guidelines, benchmark priors, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses. Altogether, Bayesian methods provide a flexible and powerful alternative for generating actionable insights in complex clinical settings, including in perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13037322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00659-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bayesian methods offer an intuitive and coherent statistical framework for updating probabilistic beliefs by integrating prior knowledge-whether from existing data or expert consensus-with new evidence via likelihood functions to generate posterior probability distributions. This approach yields clinically meaningful outputs, such as credible intervals and probabilities of treatment benefit, and can incorporate thresholds relevant to practice, like the region of practical equivalence (ROPE). Recent advances in computation-including Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithms, and probabilistic programming languages like Stan and JAGS- have made Bayesian approaches feasible even for complex hierarchical models. In perioperative medicine, these methods are particularly valuable for (1) complementing trial results by quantifying clinically important effects in the context of statistically nonsignificant findings or modest probabilities of benefit despite statistical significance, (2) enhancing meta-analyses through coherent integration of heterogeneous studies and sparse data, and (3) enabling adaptive and platform trial designs through continuous evidence synthesis. The ability to incorporate informative priors can complement existing knowledge, especially in small-sample studies, which are common in perioperative medicine, where traditional approaches provide insufficient precision. Although concerns remain regarding subjectivity in prior specification, these are increasingly addressed through structured guidelines, benchmark priors, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses. Altogether, Bayesian methods provide a flexible and powerful alternative for generating actionable insights in complex clinical settings, including in perioperative care.

贝叶斯统计学:围手术期医学临床医生的入门读物。
贝叶斯方法通过整合先验知识(无论是来自现有数据还是专家共识),通过似然函数生成后验概率分布,为更新概率信念提供了一个直观和连贯的统计框架。这种方法产生有临床意义的输出,如可信区间和治疗获益概率,并可以纳入与实践相关的阈值,如实际等效区域(ROPE)。计算方面的最新进展——包括马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)采样、哈密顿蒙特卡罗算法和概率编程语言(如Stan和JAGS)——使得贝叶斯方法即使对于复杂的层次模型也是可行的。在围手术期医学中,这些方法在以下方面尤其有价值:(1)在统计结果不显著的情况下,通过量化临床重要效应来补充试验结果;(2)通过对异质研究和稀疏数据的连贯整合来加强荟萃分析;(3)通过持续的证据合成来实现适应性和平台试验设计。整合信息性先验的能力可以补充现有知识,特别是在小样本研究中,这在围手术期医学中很常见,传统方法提供的精度不足。尽管人们仍然关注先前规范的主观性,但这些问题越来越多地通过结构化指南、基准先验和综合敏感性分析来解决。总之,贝叶斯方法为在复杂的临床环境中产生可操作的见解提供了一种灵活而强大的替代方法,包括围手术期护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书