Contributing Factors for Economic Inequality in Refractive Errors: An Analysis Employing Concentration Index and Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Methods in the Tehran Geriatric Eye Study.
Hassan Hashemi, Reza Pakzad, Mohamadreza Aghamirsalim, Alireza Hashemi, Mehdi Khabazkhoob
{"title":"Contributing Factors for Economic Inequality in Refractive Errors: An Analysis Employing Concentration Index and Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Methods in the Tehran Geriatric Eye Study.","authors":"Hassan Hashemi, Reza Pakzad, Mohamadreza Aghamirsalim, Alireza Hashemi, Mehdi Khabazkhoob","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2026.2634240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined economic inequalityin various refractive errors and decomposed its contributing factors using the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the Tehran Geriatric Eye Study, a population-based cross-sectional study conducted in 2019 involving 3200 individuals aged 60 years and older, selected through stratified random cluster sampling. All participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmic and optometric examinations. Economic inequality was assessed using the Concentration Index and further analyzed via Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3263 participants analyzed, the mean age was 69.36 (±7.63) years, and 41.92% (<i>n</i> = 1,368) were male. The concentration index revealed that astigmatism (C = -0.059, <i>p</i> < 0.001) andmyopia (C = -0.094, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were more concentrated among poorer individuals, whereas hyperopia (C = 0.056, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was more prevalent among wealthier individuals. Decomposition analysis showed significant economic disparities inrefractive errors: astigmatism (12.57%) and myopia (15.27%) were more common inlower-income groups, while hyperopia (12.21%) was more frequent in higher-income groups. The explained portion accounted for 98.17%, 85.33%, and 91.24% of the disparities in astigmatism, myopia, and hyperopia, respectively. Key contributors to inequality included age (19.96%) and sex (18.46%) forastigmatism, economic status (24.53%) and axial length (20.45%) for myopia, andcataract surgery (27.95%) along with economic status (21.77%) for hyperopia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate significant economic disparities in refractive errors, predominantly driven by identifiable factors. Age, education, cataract surgery history, and axial length were the most influential variables contributing to inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"403-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2026.2634240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined economic inequalityin various refractive errors and decomposed its contributing factors using the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition.
Methods: Data were obtained from the Tehran Geriatric Eye Study, a population-based cross-sectional study conducted in 2019 involving 3200 individuals aged 60 years and older, selected through stratified random cluster sampling. All participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmic and optometric examinations. Economic inequality was assessed using the Concentration Index and further analyzed via Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition.
Results: Among the 3263 participants analyzed, the mean age was 69.36 (±7.63) years, and 41.92% (n = 1,368) were male. The concentration index revealed that astigmatism (C = -0.059, p < 0.001) andmyopia (C = -0.094, p < 0.001) were more concentrated among poorer individuals, whereas hyperopia (C = 0.056, p < 0.001) was more prevalent among wealthier individuals. Decomposition analysis showed significant economic disparities inrefractive errors: astigmatism (12.57%) and myopia (15.27%) were more common inlower-income groups, while hyperopia (12.21%) was more frequent in higher-income groups. The explained portion accounted for 98.17%, 85.33%, and 91.24% of the disparities in astigmatism, myopia, and hyperopia, respectively. Key contributors to inequality included age (19.96%) and sex (18.46%) forastigmatism, economic status (24.53%) and axial length (20.45%) for myopia, andcataract surgery (27.95%) along with economic status (21.77%) for hyperopia.
Conclusion: These findings demonstrate significant economic disparities in refractive errors, predominantly driven by identifiable factors. Age, education, cataract surgery history, and axial length were the most influential variables contributing to inequality.
目的:研究各种屈光不正的经济不平等,并采用Oaxaca-Blinder分解法对其影响因素进行分解。方法:数据来自德黑兰老年眼科研究,这是一项基于人群的横断面研究,于2019年开展,通过分层随机整群抽样选择3200名60岁及以上的人。所有参与者都进行了全面的眼科和验光检查。利用浓度指数评估经济不平等,并通过瓦哈卡-布林德分解进一步分析。结果:3263名参与者的平均年龄为69.36(±7.63)岁,41.92% (n = 1368)为男性。C = -0.059, p p p结论:这些结果表明屈光不正存在显著的经济差异,主要由可识别因素驱动。年龄、受教育程度、白内障手术史和眼轴长度是造成不平等的最重要因素。
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.