Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy recurrence: are we almost there?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Zhe Chen, Van Ton Tran, Masaki Matsuda, Tomoko Akita, Kan Marino, Takafumi Komiyama, Hiroshi Onishi
{"title":"Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy recurrence: are we almost there?","authors":"Zhe Chen, Van Ton Tran, Masaki Matsuda, Tomoko Akita, Kan Marino, Takafumi Komiyama, Hiroshi Onishi","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rrag006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) after prostatectomy has expanded because of its radiobiological advantages and its potential to reduce treatment burden. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), an even more condensed treatment approach, has recently emerged as a possible salvage option for men with biochemical recurrence, although its role remains investigational. To summarize current evidence, we performed a narrative review of published and ongoing studies evaluating moderate HFRT and SBRT for prostate bed salvage radiotherapy, drawing from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 2025. Across the available literature, moderate HFRT using 2.5-3.0 Gy per fraction over 15-28 fractions has shown favorable tumor control with generally acceptable safety, though some studies report increased late genitourinary toxicity with higher per-fraction doses or wide treatment margins. The phase III NRG-GU003 trial demonstrated non-inferiority of HFRT compared with conventional radiotherapy using patient-reported outcomes, supporting its clinical validity. Early SBRT experiences, often using 30-34 Gy in five fractions, have shown grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity in up to approximately 29% of patients, while gastrointestinal toxicity has typically remained low. However, follow-up is short, and long-term safety remains uncertain. Although conventionally fractionated salvage radiotherapy remains the standard of care, current evidence supports moderate HFRT as an accepted alternative to conventional fractionation, whereas postoperative SBRT may be feasible in selected patients. Given limited long-term safety data and the potential for late toxicities to emerge many years after treatment, SBRT should remain investigational until results from ongoing trials become available.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13019129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrag006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) after prostatectomy has expanded because of its radiobiological advantages and its potential to reduce treatment burden. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), an even more condensed treatment approach, has recently emerged as a possible salvage option for men with biochemical recurrence, although its role remains investigational. To summarize current evidence, we performed a narrative review of published and ongoing studies evaluating moderate HFRT and SBRT for prostate bed salvage radiotherapy, drawing from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 2025. Across the available literature, moderate HFRT using 2.5-3.0 Gy per fraction over 15-28 fractions has shown favorable tumor control with generally acceptable safety, though some studies report increased late genitourinary toxicity with higher per-fraction doses or wide treatment margins. The phase III NRG-GU003 trial demonstrated non-inferiority of HFRT compared with conventional radiotherapy using patient-reported outcomes, supporting its clinical validity. Early SBRT experiences, often using 30-34 Gy in five fractions, have shown grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity in up to approximately 29% of patients, while gastrointestinal toxicity has typically remained low. However, follow-up is short, and long-term safety remains uncertain. Although conventionally fractionated salvage radiotherapy remains the standard of care, current evidence supports moderate HFRT as an accepted alternative to conventional fractionation, whereas postoperative SBRT may be feasible in selected patients. Given limited long-term safety data and the potential for late toxicities to emerge many years after treatment, SBRT should remain investigational until results from ongoing trials become available.

挽救性立体定向放疗治疗前列腺切除术后复发:我们快成功了吗?
前列腺切除术后低分割放疗(HFRT)因其放射生物学优势和减轻治疗负担的潜力而得到广泛应用。立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT),一种更浓缩的治疗方法,最近成为男性生化复发的可能补救选择,尽管其作用仍在研究中。为了总结目前的证据,我们对已发表和正在进行的评估中度HFRT和SBRT用于前列腺床补救性放疗的研究进行了叙述性回顾,这些研究来自MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL和ClinicalTrials.gov,截止到2025年5月。在现有文献中,使用2.5-3.0 Gy /次的中度HFRT比使用15-28 Gy /次的HFRT显示出良好的肿瘤控制效果,安全性普遍可接受,尽管一些研究报告较高的剂量/次或较大的治疗范围会增加晚期泌尿生殖系统毒性。根据患者报告的结果,NRG-GU003 III期试验表明,与传统放疗相比,HFRT具有非劣效性,支持其临床有效性。早期SBRT的经验,通常使用30-34 Gy分5次使用,在大约29%的患者中显示出≥2级的泌尿生殖系统毒性,而胃肠道毒性通常保持在较低水平。然而,随访时间较短,长期安全性仍不确定。虽然传统的分路补救性放疗仍然是标准的治疗方法,但目前的证据支持适度的HFRT作为传统分路放疗的可接受替代方案,而术后SBRT在选定的患者中可能是可行的。鉴于有限的长期安全性数据和治疗多年后可能出现的晚期毒性,SBRT应继续处于研究阶段,直到正在进行的试验得出结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书