Tobias Zimmermann, Luca Koechlin, Joan Walter, Dorien M Kimenai, Anda Bularga, Giulia Milan, Antonio Sileo, Deborah Fusco, Xiya Mu, Fabian J Brunner, Christoph Waldeyer, Nils A Sörensen, Johannes T Neumann, Aida Muslimovic, Kristina Vukusic, Thomas Nestelberger, Jasper Boeddinghaus, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Klara Rumora, Christian Puelacher, Danielle M Gualandro, Katharina Rentsch, Ivo Strebel, Matthias Diebold, Raphael Twerenbold, Bertil Lindahl, Ellen J S Denessen, Alma M A Mingels, Steven Meex, Nicholas L Mills, Anna Marsano, Ola Hammarsten, Christian Mueller
{"title":"The cTnI/cTnT Ratio in Myocardial Injury: A Multicohort and Experimental Synthesis.","authors":"Tobias Zimmermann, Luca Koechlin, Joan Walter, Dorien M Kimenai, Anda Bularga, Giulia Milan, Antonio Sileo, Deborah Fusco, Xiya Mu, Fabian J Brunner, Christoph Waldeyer, Nils A Sörensen, Johannes T Neumann, Aida Muslimovic, Kristina Vukusic, Thomas Nestelberger, Jasper Boeddinghaus, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Klara Rumora, Christian Puelacher, Danielle M Gualandro, Katharina Rentsch, Ivo Strebel, Matthias Diebold, Raphael Twerenbold, Bertil Lindahl, Ellen J S Denessen, Alma M A Mingels, Steven Meex, Nicholas L Mills, Anna Marsano, Ola Hammarsten, Christian Mueller","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac troponin (cTn) I and cTnT are used interchangeably in clinical practice, despite emerging evidence from pilot studies that the cTnI/cTnT ratio may differ in acute necrotic vs chronic or non-necrotic myocardial injury.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to challenge the interchangeability of cTnI and cTnT and to test the cTnI/cTnT ratio as a biologically meaningful construct of the type and severity of myocardial injury across a large, adjudicated multicohort population, validate the signal across multiple assays and external data sets, and pair clinical observations with experimental models that replicate the directional signal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from 3 prospective clinical studies with centrally adjudicated diagnoses were grouped as having no known, chronic, or acute cardiac disease. Circulating concentrations of hs-cTnI (Architect) and hs-cTnT (Elecsys) were measured, and regression models were used to examine how the cTnI/cTnT ratio relates to these diagnostic categories and its diagnostic utility. Findings were validated both internally and externally, and the cTnI/cTnT ratio was further explored in 4 experimental cardiomyocyte models simulating mild nonlethal and lethal injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9,704 individuals, the cTnI/cTnT ratio was highest in acute cardiac disease (2.06; 95% CI: 1.89-2.26), approximately 4-fold greater than in chronic (0.66; 95% CI: 0.60-0.72) and no known cardiac disease (0.50; 95% CI: 0.43-0.59). Findings were consistent across alternative hs-cTnI assays and external validation cohorts. In experimental models, mild nonlethal injury yielded cTnT-dominant release (cTnI/cTnT ratio ∼0.5), whereas lethal injury produced cTnI-dominant release (cTnI/cTnT ratio >1). Incorporating the cTnI/cTnT ratio as a predictor in a statistical model alongside cTnI and cTnT improved discrimination between type 1 and 2 acute myocardial infarction (AUC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.70-0.76 vs 0.70; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73; P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cTnI/cTnT ratio distinguishes acute necrotic from chronic/non-necrotic myocardial injury in clinical and experimental studies, and improves type 1 vs type 2 AMI discrimination, offering potential diagnostic value and challenging the interchangeability of cTnI and cTnT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"2211-2230"},"PeriodicalIF":22.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.078","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cardiac troponin (cTn) I and cTnT are used interchangeably in clinical practice, despite emerging evidence from pilot studies that the cTnI/cTnT ratio may differ in acute necrotic vs chronic or non-necrotic myocardial injury.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to challenge the interchangeability of cTnI and cTnT and to test the cTnI/cTnT ratio as a biologically meaningful construct of the type and severity of myocardial injury across a large, adjudicated multicohort population, validate the signal across multiple assays and external data sets, and pair clinical observations with experimental models that replicate the directional signal.
Methods: Participants from 3 prospective clinical studies with centrally adjudicated diagnoses were grouped as having no known, chronic, or acute cardiac disease. Circulating concentrations of hs-cTnI (Architect) and hs-cTnT (Elecsys) were measured, and regression models were used to examine how the cTnI/cTnT ratio relates to these diagnostic categories and its diagnostic utility. Findings were validated both internally and externally, and the cTnI/cTnT ratio was further explored in 4 experimental cardiomyocyte models simulating mild nonlethal and lethal injury.
Results: Among 9,704 individuals, the cTnI/cTnT ratio was highest in acute cardiac disease (2.06; 95% CI: 1.89-2.26), approximately 4-fold greater than in chronic (0.66; 95% CI: 0.60-0.72) and no known cardiac disease (0.50; 95% CI: 0.43-0.59). Findings were consistent across alternative hs-cTnI assays and external validation cohorts. In experimental models, mild nonlethal injury yielded cTnT-dominant release (cTnI/cTnT ratio ∼0.5), whereas lethal injury produced cTnI-dominant release (cTnI/cTnT ratio >1). Incorporating the cTnI/cTnT ratio as a predictor in a statistical model alongside cTnI and cTnT improved discrimination between type 1 and 2 acute myocardial infarction (AUC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.70-0.76 vs 0.70; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73; P < 0.01).
Conclusions: The cTnI/cTnT ratio distinguishes acute necrotic from chronic/non-necrotic myocardial injury in clinical and experimental studies, and improves type 1 vs type 2 AMI discrimination, offering potential diagnostic value and challenging the interchangeability of cTnI and cTnT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints.
Content Profile:
-Original Investigations
-JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews
-JACC Review Topics of the Week
-Guidelines & Clinical Documents
-JACC Guideline Comparisons
-JACC Scientific Expert Panels
-Cardiovascular Medicine & Society
-Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation)
-Research Letters
-Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages
-Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders