The cTnI/cTnT Ratio in Myocardial Injury: A Multicohort and Experimental Synthesis.

IF 22.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tobias Zimmermann, Luca Koechlin, Joan Walter, Dorien M Kimenai, Anda Bularga, Giulia Milan, Antonio Sileo, Deborah Fusco, Xiya Mu, Fabian J Brunner, Christoph Waldeyer, Nils A Sörensen, Johannes T Neumann, Aida Muslimovic, Kristina Vukusic, Thomas Nestelberger, Jasper Boeddinghaus, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Klara Rumora, Christian Puelacher, Danielle M Gualandro, Katharina Rentsch, Ivo Strebel, Matthias Diebold, Raphael Twerenbold, Bertil Lindahl, Ellen J S Denessen, Alma M A Mingels, Steven Meex, Nicholas L Mills, Anna Marsano, Ola Hammarsten, Christian Mueller
{"title":"The cTnI/cTnT Ratio in Myocardial Injury: A Multicohort and Experimental Synthesis.","authors":"Tobias Zimmermann, Luca Koechlin, Joan Walter, Dorien M Kimenai, Anda Bularga, Giulia Milan, Antonio Sileo, Deborah Fusco, Xiya Mu, Fabian J Brunner, Christoph Waldeyer, Nils A Sörensen, Johannes T Neumann, Aida Muslimovic, Kristina Vukusic, Thomas Nestelberger, Jasper Boeddinghaus, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Klara Rumora, Christian Puelacher, Danielle M Gualandro, Katharina Rentsch, Ivo Strebel, Matthias Diebold, Raphael Twerenbold, Bertil Lindahl, Ellen J S Denessen, Alma M A Mingels, Steven Meex, Nicholas L Mills, Anna Marsano, Ola Hammarsten, Christian Mueller","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac troponin (cTn) I and cTnT are used interchangeably in clinical practice, despite emerging evidence from pilot studies that the cTnI/cTnT ratio may differ in acute necrotic vs chronic or non-necrotic myocardial injury.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to challenge the interchangeability of cTnI and cTnT and to test the cTnI/cTnT ratio as a biologically meaningful construct of the type and severity of myocardial injury across a large, adjudicated multicohort population, validate the signal across multiple assays and external data sets, and pair clinical observations with experimental models that replicate the directional signal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from 3 prospective clinical studies with centrally adjudicated diagnoses were grouped as having no known, chronic, or acute cardiac disease. Circulating concentrations of hs-cTnI (Architect) and hs-cTnT (Elecsys) were measured, and regression models were used to examine how the cTnI/cTnT ratio relates to these diagnostic categories and its diagnostic utility. Findings were validated both internally and externally, and the cTnI/cTnT ratio was further explored in 4 experimental cardiomyocyte models simulating mild nonlethal and lethal injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9,704 individuals, the cTnI/cTnT ratio was highest in acute cardiac disease (2.06; 95% CI: 1.89-2.26), approximately 4-fold greater than in chronic (0.66; 95% CI: 0.60-0.72) and no known cardiac disease (0.50; 95% CI: 0.43-0.59). Findings were consistent across alternative hs-cTnI assays and external validation cohorts. In experimental models, mild nonlethal injury yielded cTnT-dominant release (cTnI/cTnT ratio ∼0.5), whereas lethal injury produced cTnI-dominant release (cTnI/cTnT ratio >1). Incorporating the cTnI/cTnT ratio as a predictor in a statistical model alongside cTnI and cTnT improved discrimination between type 1 and 2 acute myocardial infarction (AUC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.70-0.76 vs 0.70; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73; P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cTnI/cTnT ratio distinguishes acute necrotic from chronic/non-necrotic myocardial injury in clinical and experimental studies, and improves type 1 vs type 2 AMI discrimination, offering potential diagnostic value and challenging the interchangeability of cTnI and cTnT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"2211-2230"},"PeriodicalIF":22.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.078","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac troponin (cTn) I and cTnT are used interchangeably in clinical practice, despite emerging evidence from pilot studies that the cTnI/cTnT ratio may differ in acute necrotic vs chronic or non-necrotic myocardial injury.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to challenge the interchangeability of cTnI and cTnT and to test the cTnI/cTnT ratio as a biologically meaningful construct of the type and severity of myocardial injury across a large, adjudicated multicohort population, validate the signal across multiple assays and external data sets, and pair clinical observations with experimental models that replicate the directional signal.

Methods: Participants from 3 prospective clinical studies with centrally adjudicated diagnoses were grouped as having no known, chronic, or acute cardiac disease. Circulating concentrations of hs-cTnI (Architect) and hs-cTnT (Elecsys) were measured, and regression models were used to examine how the cTnI/cTnT ratio relates to these diagnostic categories and its diagnostic utility. Findings were validated both internally and externally, and the cTnI/cTnT ratio was further explored in 4 experimental cardiomyocyte models simulating mild nonlethal and lethal injury.

Results: Among 9,704 individuals, the cTnI/cTnT ratio was highest in acute cardiac disease (2.06; 95% CI: 1.89-2.26), approximately 4-fold greater than in chronic (0.66; 95% CI: 0.60-0.72) and no known cardiac disease (0.50; 95% CI: 0.43-0.59). Findings were consistent across alternative hs-cTnI assays and external validation cohorts. In experimental models, mild nonlethal injury yielded cTnT-dominant release (cTnI/cTnT ratio ∼0.5), whereas lethal injury produced cTnI-dominant release (cTnI/cTnT ratio >1). Incorporating the cTnI/cTnT ratio as a predictor in a statistical model alongside cTnI and cTnT improved discrimination between type 1 and 2 acute myocardial infarction (AUC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.70-0.76 vs 0.70; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73; P < 0.01).

Conclusions: The cTnI/cTnT ratio distinguishes acute necrotic from chronic/non-necrotic myocardial injury in clinical and experimental studies, and improves type 1 vs type 2 AMI discrimination, offering potential diagnostic value and challenging the interchangeability of cTnI and cTnT.

心肌损伤中的cTnI/cTnT比值:多队列和实验综合。
背景:在临床实践中,心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn) I和cTnT可互换使用,尽管从初步研究中出现的证据表明,cTnI/cTnT比值在急性坏死性心肌损伤与慢性或非坏死性心肌损伤中可能不同。目的:本研究的目的是挑战cTnI和cTnT的互换性,并测试cTnI/cTnT比率作为一种具有生物学意义的心肌损伤类型和严重程度的结构,通过多种分析和外部数据集验证信号,并将临床观察与复制定向信号的实验模型相结合。方法:来自3项前瞻性临床研究的参与者被分为无已知、慢性或急性心脏病。测量hs-cTnI (Architect)和hs-cTnT (Elecsys)的循环浓度,并使用回归模型来检查cTnI/cTnT比率与这些诊断类别及其诊断效用的关系。对研究结果进行内外验证,并在4种模拟轻度非致死性和致死性损伤的实验性心肌细胞模型中进一步探讨cTnI/cTnT比值。结果:在9704名患者中,急性心脏病患者的cTnI/cTnT比值最高(2.06,95% CI: 1.89-2.26),约为慢性心脏病患者(0.66,95% CI: 0.60-0.72)和无已知心脏病患者(0.50,95% CI: 0.43-0.59)的4倍。其他hs-cTnI试验和外部验证队列的结果是一致的。在实验模型中,轻度非致死性损伤产生cTnI-显性释放(cTnI/cTnT比值约0.5),而致死性损伤产生cTnI-显性释放(cTnI/cTnT比值bb0.1)。在统计模型中,将cTnI/cTnT比值与cTnI和cTnT一起作为预测因子,可改善1型和2型急性心肌梗死的区分(AUC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.70-0.76 vs 0.70; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73; P < 0.01)。结论:cTnI/cTnT比值在临床和实验研究中可区分急性坏死性与慢性/非坏死性心肌损伤,提高了1型与2型AMI的区分,具有潜在的诊断价值,挑战了cTnI和cTnT的互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书