Effects of sequencing platforms on the profiling of root mycorrhizal communities in Pinus densiflora.

IF 3.8 4区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Microbiology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-31 DOI:10.71150/jm.2509008
Ki Hyeong Park, Seung-Yoon Oh, Shinnam Yoo, Yoonhee Cho, Ji Seon Kim, Chang Wan Seo, Chang Sun Kim, Young Woon Lim
{"title":"Effects of sequencing platforms on the profiling of root mycorrhizal communities in Pinus densiflora.","authors":"Ki Hyeong Park, Seung-Yoon Oh, Shinnam Yoo, Yoonhee Cho, Ji Seon Kim, Chang Wan Seo, Chang Sun Kim, Young Woon Lim","doi":"10.71150/jm.2509008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a powerful and efficient tool for surveying mycorrhizal mycobiome diversity, surpassing classical methods in accuracy and throughput. Long-read NGS techniques are increasingly applied under the assumption that they provide better taxonomic resolution, yet their use often lacks a balanced evaluation against the established strengths and limitations of widely used short-read NGS technologies. This study compares Illumina MiSeq and PacBio Sequel platforms in analyzing the mycorrhizal mycobiome of Pinus densiflora roots, focusing on how sequencing platforms and database choice influence taxonomic resolution and diversity patterns. Both platforms detected mycorrhizal taxa with similar taxonomic resolution, recovering nearly all taxa previously reported from pine roots. Most mycorrhizal taxa were shared between datasets, although several taxa were detected exclusively by one platform. In terms of diversity, the short-read dataset showed higher diversity due to greater sequencing depth, whereas the long-read dataset offered improved identification of rare or closely related taxa owing to longer sequence information. Moreover, supplementing reference databases with locally derived sequences enhanced taxonomic resolution and the detection of native taxa in both approaches, with a stronger effect for the long-read dataset. Overall, our results emphasize that short- and long-read sequencing each have distinct advantages for mycorrhizal community analysis, and that the use of curated local reference databases is essential to maximize taxonomic resolution and improve the detection of regionally unique taxa.</p>","PeriodicalId":16546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology","volume":"64 1","pages":"e2509008"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.71150/jm.2509008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a powerful and efficient tool for surveying mycorrhizal mycobiome diversity, surpassing classical methods in accuracy and throughput. Long-read NGS techniques are increasingly applied under the assumption that they provide better taxonomic resolution, yet their use often lacks a balanced evaluation against the established strengths and limitations of widely used short-read NGS technologies. This study compares Illumina MiSeq and PacBio Sequel platforms in analyzing the mycorrhizal mycobiome of Pinus densiflora roots, focusing on how sequencing platforms and database choice influence taxonomic resolution and diversity patterns. Both platforms detected mycorrhizal taxa with similar taxonomic resolution, recovering nearly all taxa previously reported from pine roots. Most mycorrhizal taxa were shared between datasets, although several taxa were detected exclusively by one platform. In terms of diversity, the short-read dataset showed higher diversity due to greater sequencing depth, whereas the long-read dataset offered improved identification of rare or closely related taxa owing to longer sequence information. Moreover, supplementing reference databases with locally derived sequences enhanced taxonomic resolution and the detection of native taxa in both approaches, with a stronger effect for the long-read dataset. Overall, our results emphasize that short- and long-read sequencing each have distinct advantages for mycorrhizal community analysis, and that the use of curated local reference databases is essential to maximize taxonomic resolution and improve the detection of regionally unique taxa.

测序平台对密松根菌群落图谱的影响。
新一代测序(NGS)已成为测量菌根菌群多样性的强大而有效的工具,在准确性和通量方面优于传统方法。长读NGS技术在提供更好的分类分辨率的假设下得到了越来越多的应用,但它们的使用往往缺乏对广泛使用的短读NGS技术的既定优势和局限性的平衡评估。本研究比较了Illumina MiSeq和PacBio Sequel平台对密松根系菌根菌群的分析,重点研究了测序平台和数据库选择对分类分辨率和多样性模式的影响。两个平台以相似的分类分辨率检测到菌根分类群,几乎恢复了以前报道的所有松树根分类群。大多数菌根分类群在数据集之间是共享的,尽管一些分类群在一个平台上被单独检测到。在多样性方面,短读数据集由于测序深度更大而表现出更高的多样性,而长读数据集由于序列信息更长而能够更好地识别稀有或密切相关的分类群。此外,在参考数据库中补充本地衍生序列可以提高两种方法的分类分辨率和本地分类群的检测,对长读数据集的效果更强。总之,我们的研究结果强调了短读和长读测序在菌根群落分析中各自具有明显的优势,并且使用经过整理的本地参考数据库对于最大限度地提高分类分辨率和提高区域独特分类群的检测是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology
Journal of Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Publishes papers that deal with research on microorganisms, including archaea, bacteria, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, protozoa, and simple eukaryotic microorganisms. Topics considered for publication include Microbial Systematics, Evolutionary Microbiology, Microbial Ecology, Environmental Microbiology, Microbial Genetics, Genomics, Molecular Biology, Microbial Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbial Pathogenesis, Host-Microbe Interaction, Systems Microbiology, Synthetic Microbiology, Bioinformatics and Virology. Manuscripts dealing with simple identification of microorganism(s), cloning of a known gene and its expression in a microbial host, and clinical statistics will not be considered for publication by JM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书