Health policy, collaboration and investment in the post-COVID era: a review from UHC and health security integration perspective.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in health systems globally, highlighting chronic underinvestment, fragmentation, and a lack of preparedness with catastrophic impact on public health, economies and societies. Lessons learned reconfirmed the necessity to build health systems resilience, integrating efforts to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and health security in tandem. RESULTS: This study identified 63 global and regional policies, collaborations, and investments (collectively termed “initiatives”) that came out post-COVID-19 and reviewed them in reference to their focus on integration of UHC and health security through the lens of WHO’s seven policy recommendations for building resilient health systems. The findings indicate that while efforts to align UHC and health security are evident at global and regional levels, they vary in depth and coherence. 81% of initiatives align with at least four of the seven WHO policy recommendations. While there is emphasis for health security preparedness, focus on primary care and health promotion is less pronounced. Policy initiatives show stronger alignment with WHO policy recommendations compared to Collaborations or Investments, indicating synergies between policies, while apparently a gap between policy and practice. Multilateral groups, including UN agencies, and government-affiliated organizations show greater alignment with the WHO policy recommendations too, while there is less alignment with those from non-governmental and other entities. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that while post COVID-19 policies increasingly articulate visions for integrated health systems strengthening, existing collaborations and investments have not demonstrated comparable commitment to the implementation of these visions. This underscores a prevailing disconnect among global health actors and the mostly reactive and short-term nature of external investments and partnerships. In low-income and fragile health system contexts, this misalignment risks the inefficient use of global support and may perpetuate foundational weaknesses in health systems. Moreover, this is particularly problematic given worsening fiscal constraints from reductions in overseas development assistance and country-level economic contractions. By (re)orienting global health policies, collaborations, and investments toward more unified approaches to achieving UHC and health security, the international community can more effectively support countries in building health systems capable of withstanding future crises, maintaining essential health services and safeguarding gains in health equity.