Enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis: a machine learning-based biomarker approach.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Patricia Porras-Quesada, Alberto Ramírez-Mena, Verónica Arenas-Rodríguez, Fernando Vázquez-Alonso, Jesús Alcalá-Fdez, Beatriz Álvarez-González, Luis Javier Martínez-González, María Jesús Álvarez-Cubero
{"title":"Enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis: a machine learning-based biomarker approach.","authors":"Patricia Porras-Quesada, Alberto Ramírez-Mena, Verónica Arenas-Rodríguez, Fernando Vázquez-Alonso, Jesús Alcalá-Fdez, Beatriz Álvarez-González, Luis Javier Martínez-González, María Jesús Álvarez-Cubero","doi":"10.1186/s40246-026-00939-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: The lack of reliable screening biomarkers for prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis makes tissue biopsy the gold-standard strategy. However, its frequent inconclusive results often lead to repeated procedures, increasing patient burden and healthcare costs. In this context, machine learning (ML) presents a novel approach for identifying gene signatures associated with tumor presence, offering a promising avenue for improved PC detection. Therefore, the present study explored the diagnostic potential of an ML-based gene signature and its applicability in tissue and plasma samples. METHODS: This study evaluated the clinical applicability of an ML-based algorithm developed using TCGA data (n = 608) and tested in an independent dataset (n = 349). The eleven candidate genes that contributed most to the predictive model were initially profiled by targeted RNA-Seq in prostate tissue validation cohort (n = 141) and further validated in replication tissue (n = 75) and plasma (n = 50) cohorts by qPCR and dPCR, respectively. RESULTS: Gene expression analysis in prostate tissue led to the identification of a six-gene signature (DLX1, TDRD1, AMACR, HPN, HOXC6, and OR51E2) with high diagnostic performance (AUC = 95.9%). Expression patterns supported the gene signature’s potential to identify false-negative cases and correctly classify inconclusive biopsy results. In plasma, AMACR demonstrated added diagnostic value as a non-invasive biomarker when integrated with clinical parameters (AUC = 93.21%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that our ML-based gene signature can accurately distinguish PC from non-tumoral tissue and resolve ambiguous biopsy results. Its integration alongside histopathology has the potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty, improving PC early detection and guiding clinical decision-making. </p>","PeriodicalId":13183,"journal":{"name":"Human Genomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13040917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-026-00939-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lack of reliable screening biomarkers for prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis makes tissue biopsy the gold-standard strategy. However, its frequent inconclusive results often lead to repeated procedures, increasing patient burden and healthcare costs. In this context, machine learning (ML) presents a novel approach for identifying gene signatures associated with tumor presence, offering a promising avenue for improved PC detection. Therefore, the present study explored the diagnostic potential of an ML-based gene signature and its applicability in tissue and plasma samples. METHODS: This study evaluated the clinical applicability of an ML-based algorithm developed using TCGA data (n = 608) and tested in an independent dataset (n = 349). The eleven candidate genes that contributed most to the predictive model were initially profiled by targeted RNA-Seq in prostate tissue validation cohort (n = 141) and further validated in replication tissue (n = 75) and plasma (n = 50) cohorts by qPCR and dPCR, respectively. RESULTS: Gene expression analysis in prostate tissue led to the identification of a six-gene signature (DLX1, TDRD1, AMACR, HPN, HOXC6, and OR51E2) with high diagnostic performance (AUC = 95.9%). Expression patterns supported the gene signature’s potential to identify false-negative cases and correctly classify inconclusive biopsy results. In plasma, AMACR demonstrated added diagnostic value as a non-invasive biomarker when integrated with clinical parameters (AUC = 93.21%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that our ML-based gene signature can accurately distinguish PC from non-tumoral tissue and resolve ambiguous biopsy results. Its integration alongside histopathology has the potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty, improving PC early detection and guiding clinical decision-making.

增强前列腺癌诊断:一种基于机器学习的生物标志物方法。
背景:缺乏可靠的筛查前列腺癌(PC)诊断的生物标志物使得组织活检成为金标准策略。然而,其经常不确定的结果往往导致重复的程序,增加患者的负担和医疗保健费用。在这种情况下,机器学习(ML)提出了一种识别与肿瘤存在相关的基因特征的新方法,为改进PC检测提供了一条有前途的途径。因此,本研究探讨了基于ml的基因标记的诊断潜力及其在组织和血浆样本中的适用性。方法:本研究评估了使用TCGA数据(n = 608)开发的基于ml的算法的临床适用性,并在独立数据集(n = 349)中进行了测试。对预测模型贡献最大的11个候选基因首先在前列腺组织验证队列(n = 141)中通过靶向RNA-Seq进行分析,然后分别通过qPCR和dPCR在复制组织(n = 75)和血浆(n = 50)队列中进一步验证。结果:通过对前列腺组织的基因表达分析,鉴定出6个基因特征(DLX1、TDRD1、AMACR、HPN、HOXC6和OR51E2),具有较高的诊断效能(AUC = 95.9%)。表达模式支持基因标记识别假阴性病例和正确分类不确定活检结果的潜力。在血浆中,AMACR作为无创生物标志物与临床参数相结合,显示出更高的诊断价值(AUC = 93.21%)。结论:这些发现表明,我们基于ml的基因标记可以准确区分PC和非肿瘤组织,并解决不明确的活检结果。它与组织病理学的结合有可能减少诊断的不确定性,提高PC的早期发现和指导临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Genomics
Human Genomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Genomics is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that focuses on the application of genomic analysis in all aspects of human health and disease, as well as genomic analysis of drug efficacy and safety, and comparative genomics. Topics covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmacogenomics, genome-wide association studies, genome-wide sequencing, exome sequencing, next-generation deep-sequencing, functional genomics, epigenomics, translational genomics, expression profiling, proteomics, bioinformatics, animal models, statistical genetics, genetic epidemiology, human population genetics and comparative genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书