Refining the Protocol and Clinical Pathway for Oesophageal Screening in Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies: An Examination of Clinical and Operational Impacts Over Five Years.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Dysphagia Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1007/s00455-025-10917-0
Kellie McCarthy, Emma Finch, Anna Miles
{"title":"Refining the Protocol and Clinical Pathway for Oesophageal Screening in Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies: An Examination of Clinical and Operational Impacts Over Five Years.","authors":"Kellie McCarthy, Emma Finch, Anna Miles","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10917-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current international practice guidelines recommend videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSSs) include oesophageal screening. However, the clinical application of oesophageal screening is not well established. A multidisciplinary dysphagia team at one hospital refined their oesophageal screening protocol and clinical pathway over five years, exploring clinical and operational impacts. Retrospective chart audits were conducted for 100 consecutive 2024 VFSS patients (refined protocol group). VFSS reports, gastroenterologist (GE) consultations and clinical pathway adherence were compared to previously published VFSS cohorts at the research site (pre-protocol group, 2019-20, n = 100; protocol group, 2020-21, n = 160). There were no differences between the three groups for age (p > .05) or oropharyngeal dysphagia severity (p > .05). Rates of oesophageal screening significantly increased (p < .001) following protocol introduction. In the refined protocol group, there was a significant increase (83% versus 6%, p < .001) in speech-language pathologists (SLPs) providing oesophageal strategy advice and no difference in patient VFSS radiation dose (p > .05) compared to the protocol group when oesophageal screening was conducted. There was no difference between the three groups for new GE consultation rates (p > .05). Post-audit, SLP + GE case discussions were added to the clinical pathway to allow for more individualised management of complex patients. The refined oesophageal screening protocol and clinical pathway expanded clinician understanding of patients' dysphagia by marrying reported symptoms with VFSS findings and led to targeted intervention without adverse impacts. Ongoing work is required to further optimise multidisciplinary dysphagia team collaboration and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":"635-649"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10917-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current international practice guidelines recommend videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSSs) include oesophageal screening. However, the clinical application of oesophageal screening is not well established. A multidisciplinary dysphagia team at one hospital refined their oesophageal screening protocol and clinical pathway over five years, exploring clinical and operational impacts. Retrospective chart audits were conducted for 100 consecutive 2024 VFSS patients (refined protocol group). VFSS reports, gastroenterologist (GE) consultations and clinical pathway adherence were compared to previously published VFSS cohorts at the research site (pre-protocol group, 2019-20, n = 100; protocol group, 2020-21, n = 160). There were no differences between the three groups for age (p > .05) or oropharyngeal dysphagia severity (p > .05). Rates of oesophageal screening significantly increased (p < .001) following protocol introduction. In the refined protocol group, there was a significant increase (83% versus 6%, p < .001) in speech-language pathologists (SLPs) providing oesophageal strategy advice and no difference in patient VFSS radiation dose (p > .05) compared to the protocol group when oesophageal screening was conducted. There was no difference between the three groups for new GE consultation rates (p > .05). Post-audit, SLP + GE case discussions were added to the clinical pathway to allow for more individualised management of complex patients. The refined oesophageal screening protocol and clinical pathway expanded clinician understanding of patients' dysphagia by marrying reported symptoms with VFSS findings and led to targeted intervention without adverse impacts. Ongoing work is required to further optimise multidisciplinary dysphagia team collaboration and patient outcomes.

在吞咽研究中完善食管透视筛查的方案和临床途径:五年来临床和手术影响的检查。
目前的国际实践指南建议采用包括食道筛查在内的透视吞咽检查(vfss)。然而,食道筛查的临床应用尚不完善。一家医院的多学科吞咽困难小组在五年的时间里完善了他们的食管筛查方案和临床途径,探索了临床和手术的影响。对100例连续2024例VFSS患者(改进方案组)进行回顾性图表审核。将VFSS报告、胃肠病学家(GE)咨询和临床路径依从性与先前在研究现场发表的VFSS队列进行比较(方案前组,2019-20年,n = 100;方案组,2020-21年,n = 160)。三组患者的年龄(p < 0.05)和口咽吞咽困难严重程度(p < 0.05)均无差异。与方案组相比,进行食管筛查时,食管筛查率显著增加(p . 0.05)。三组间新的GE咨询率无差异(p < 0.05)。审核后,SLP + GE病例讨论被添加到临床路径中,以允许对复杂患者进行更个性化的管理。完善的食管筛查方案和临床路径通过将报告的症状与VFSS结果相结合,扩大了临床医生对患者吞咽困难的认识,并导致了有针对性的干预,而没有不良影响。需要进一步优化多学科吞咽困难团队协作和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书