Vijaya K Gothwal, Andrew Miller, Mei Ying Boon, Ahalya Subramanian, Alexis Malkin, Ava K Bittner
{"title":"Apps for people with vision impairment: an international review of practitioner suggestions and app availability.","authors":"Vijaya K Gothwal, Andrew Miller, Mei Ying Boon, Ahalya Subramanian, Alexis Malkin, Ava K Bittner","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2026.2631757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Assistive smartphone apps play an integral role in supporting people with vision impairment (VI). Low vision rehabilitation (LVR) professionals need an understanding of these tools to provide effective, up-to-date guidance to help patients identify options that can improve daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Smartphones and assistive apps are widely used by people with VI, offering versatile and portable tools which support daily activities and promote independence. However, the volume and variability of apps create challenges for practitioners particularly as apps are updated frequently and artificial intelligence is gaining prominence. The purpose of this study is to describe how practitioners identify and make app recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international cross sectional survey of LVR professionals was conducted to identify commonly recommended visual assistive apps. Responses were categorised by country income level and professional group of respondents. A concurrent search of English-language app stores, using predefined terms was performed to identify and compare assistive app availability with practitioner recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>App recommendation patterns varied by practitioner role and region. Optometrists frequently recommended magnifier apps, while therapists tended to suggest computer vision and sighted guide apps. Most commonly recommended apps were Seeing AI and Be My Eyes in high-income countries, and weZoom Magnifying glass and Be My Eyes in lower-income countries. Only two of ten most frequently recommended apps, Seeing AI and Be My Eyes, appeared consistently in app store searches across all four countries and both Android and iOS operating systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comparing practitioner recommendations reflects potential differences in access, awareness, training, device availability, and patient needs. Understanding these insights helps to inform clinical decision-making and encourage more consistent and tailored support to diverse patient populations. Given the rapid pace of app development, regular review of the most suitable apps and clear dissemination of reliable information to practitioners are essential for informed evidence-based decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"1225-1238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2026.2631757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical relevance: Assistive smartphone apps play an integral role in supporting people with vision impairment (VI). Low vision rehabilitation (LVR) professionals need an understanding of these tools to provide effective, up-to-date guidance to help patients identify options that can improve daily functioning.
Background: Smartphones and assistive apps are widely used by people with VI, offering versatile and portable tools which support daily activities and promote independence. However, the volume and variability of apps create challenges for practitioners particularly as apps are updated frequently and artificial intelligence is gaining prominence. The purpose of this study is to describe how practitioners identify and make app recommendations.
Methods: An international cross sectional survey of LVR professionals was conducted to identify commonly recommended visual assistive apps. Responses were categorised by country income level and professional group of respondents. A concurrent search of English-language app stores, using predefined terms was performed to identify and compare assistive app availability with practitioner recommendations.
Results: App recommendation patterns varied by practitioner role and region. Optometrists frequently recommended magnifier apps, while therapists tended to suggest computer vision and sighted guide apps. Most commonly recommended apps were Seeing AI and Be My Eyes in high-income countries, and weZoom Magnifying glass and Be My Eyes in lower-income countries. Only two of ten most frequently recommended apps, Seeing AI and Be My Eyes, appeared consistently in app store searches across all four countries and both Android and iOS operating systems.
Conclusion: Comparing practitioner recommendations reflects potential differences in access, awareness, training, device availability, and patient needs. Understanding these insights helps to inform clinical decision-making and encourage more consistent and tailored support to diverse patient populations. Given the rapid pace of app development, regular review of the most suitable apps and clear dissemination of reliable information to practitioners are essential for informed evidence-based decision making.
临床相关性:辅助智能手机应用程序在支持视力障碍患者(VI)方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。低视力康复(LVR)专业人员需要了解这些工具,以提供有效的、最新的指导,帮助患者确定可以改善日常功能的选择。背景:智能手机和辅助应用程序被VI患者广泛使用,提供多功能和便携式工具,支持日常活动并促进独立性。然而,应用程序的数量和可变性给从业者带来了挑战,特别是在应用程序频繁更新和人工智能日益突出的情况下。本研究的目的是描述从业者如何识别和推荐应用程序。方法:对LVR专业人员进行国际横断面调查,以确定常用的视觉辅助应用程序。答复按国家收入水平和答复者的专业群体分类。同时搜索英语应用商店,使用预定义的术语来识别和比较辅助应用程序的可用性与从业者的建议。结果:应用程序推荐模式因从业者角色和地区而异。验光师经常推荐放大镜应用程序,而治疗师倾向于推荐计算机视觉和视力指导应用程序。高收入国家最常推荐的应用是Seeing AI和Be My Eyes,低收入国家最常推荐的应用是weZoom Magnifying glass和Be My Eyes。在10款最常被推荐的应用中,只有Seeing AI和Be My Eyes这两款应用在所有4个国家的应用商店搜索中持续出现,并同时出现在安卓和iOS操作系统中。结论:比较医生的建议反映了在获取、意识、培训、设备可用性和患者需求方面的潜在差异。了解这些见解有助于为临床决策提供信息,并鼓励为不同的患者群体提供更一致和量身定制的支持。鉴于应用程序开发的快速步伐,定期审查最合适的应用程序并向从业者明确传播可靠信息对于知情的循证决策至关重要。
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.