Reliability and Construct Validity of a Questionnaire for Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant Dentistry.

IF 5.3 1区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Clinical Oral Implants Research Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1111/clr.70110

Tonje Moen Eckhoff, Erik Klepsland Mauland, Anders Verket, Elisabeth Lind Melbye

{"title":"Reliability and Construct Validity of a Questionnaire for Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant Dentistry.","authors":"Tonje Moen Eckhoff, Erik Klepsland Mauland, Anders Verket, Elisabeth Lind Melbye","doi":"10.1111/clr.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and construct validity of a questionnaire assessing patient-reported outcomes following dental implant rehabilitation.Material and methods: A questionnaire was mailed to patients 8 years posttreatment to assess experiences with dental implant therapy, including satisfaction, oral function, perceived pretreatment information and complications. Patients completed the questionnaire again during a clinical examination. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations (CITC), while test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Construct-related validity was examined through associations between questionnaire domains and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) measured by OHIP-14.Results: A total of 206 patients completed the questionnaire twice. For individual items, ICCs ranged from 0.39 to 0.75 and CITCs from 0.39 to 0.66. The full questionnaire had an alpha of 0.78 and an ICC of 0.78. Construct-related validity was supported through associations between the questionnaire domains patient satisfaction, pretreatment information and the OHIP-14 sum scores.Conclusions: The questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability, good test-retest performance, and reasonable construct validity.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":" ","pages":"657-666"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and construct validity of a questionnaire assessing patient-reported outcomes following dental implant rehabilitation.

Material and methods: A questionnaire was mailed to patients 8 years posttreatment to assess experiences with dental implant therapy, including satisfaction, oral function, perceived pretreatment information and complications. Patients completed the questionnaire again during a clinical examination. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations (CITC), while test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Construct-related validity was examined through associations between questionnaire domains and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) measured by OHIP-14.

Results: A total of 206 patients completed the questionnaire twice. For individual items, ICCs ranged from 0.39 to 0.75 and CITCs from 0.39 to 0.66. The full questionnaire had an alpha of 0.78 and an ICC of 0.78. Construct-related validity was supported through associations between the questionnaire domains patient satisfaction, pretreatment information and the OHIP-14 sum scores.

Conclusions: The questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability, good test-retest performance, and reasonable construct validity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一份评估种植牙科患者报告结果的问卷的信度和结构效度。

目的：本研究旨在评估一份评估种植牙康复后患者报告结果的问卷的信度和构建效度。材料与方法：对治疗后8年的患者邮寄一份问卷，评估其对种植牙治疗的满意度、口腔功能、感知的预处理信息和并发症。患者在临床检查时再次填写问卷。内部一致性采用Cronbach's alpha和校正的项目-总相关（CITC）来评估，而重测信度采用类内相关系数（ICC）来评估。通过问卷域与OHIP-14测量的口腔健康相关生活质量（OHRQoL）之间的关联来检验结构相关效度。结果：共206例患者完成2次问卷调查。个别项目的icc范围为0.39至0.75，CITCs范围为0.39至0.66。完整问卷的alpha值为0.78，ICC值为0.78。通过问卷域患者满意度、预处理信息与OHIP-14总分之间的关联来支持结构相关效度。结论：问卷具有良好的内部一致性信度、良好的重测性能和合理的结构效度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

7.70

自引率

11.60%

发文量

149

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.