Compulsory Psychiatric Treatment at Home in the Netherlands: A Case Report.

Q4 Medicine
Case Reports in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-02-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/crps/4088726
D A de Waardt, G A M Widdershoven, M H C M Laan, R Favie, C L Mulder
{"title":"Compulsory Psychiatric Treatment at Home in the Netherlands: A Case Report.","authors":"D A de Waardt, G A M Widdershoven, M H C M Laan, R Favie, C L Mulder","doi":"10.1155/crps/4088726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An important aim of the new mental health act implemented in the Netherlands in 2020 was to shift the focus from hospitalization to treatment. The act provides an option for patients' compulsory treatment at home (CTH). Unlike compulsory community treatment (CCT), which allows mental health workers to hospitalize patients involuntarily if they do not comply with treatment. CTH is not provided elsewhere in the world. This case report concerns a patient who, to avoid hospitalization, received CTH in the form of compulsory medication and was able to recover at home. Retrospectively, she and the mental health team both positively evaluated this use of CTH. The parties involved all concluded that CTH restricted the patient's autonomy less than hospitalization, it did not influence the therapeutic relationship, and the CTH could be delivered in a way that it did not compromise participants' safety. This case report shows that, in some situations, CTH can avoid hospitalization. Care should nonetheless be taken to assess its appropriateness, to discuss any preconditions, and to evaluate the use of compulsory treatment in dialog with the patient and significant others.</p>","PeriodicalId":9631,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Psychiatry","volume":"2026 ","pages":"4088726"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/crps/4088726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important aim of the new mental health act implemented in the Netherlands in 2020 was to shift the focus from hospitalization to treatment. The act provides an option for patients' compulsory treatment at home (CTH). Unlike compulsory community treatment (CCT), which allows mental health workers to hospitalize patients involuntarily if they do not comply with treatment. CTH is not provided elsewhere in the world. This case report concerns a patient who, to avoid hospitalization, received CTH in the form of compulsory medication and was able to recover at home. Retrospectively, she and the mental health team both positively evaluated this use of CTH. The parties involved all concluded that CTH restricted the patient's autonomy less than hospitalization, it did not influence the therapeutic relationship, and the CTH could be delivered in a way that it did not compromise participants' safety. This case report shows that, in some situations, CTH can avoid hospitalization. Care should nonetheless be taken to assess its appropriateness, to discuss any preconditions, and to evaluate the use of compulsory treatment in dialog with the patient and significant others.

荷兰家庭强制精神病治疗:一个案例报告。
2020年在荷兰实施的新精神卫生法的一个重要目标是将重点从住院转移到治疗。该法案为患者提供了强制在家治疗(CTH)的选择。与强制社区治疗(CCT)不同,强制社区治疗允许精神卫生工作者在患者不遵守治疗的情况下非自愿地住院治疗。在世界其他地方没有提供CTH。本病例报告涉及一名患者,为了避免住院,以强制药物的形式接受了CTH,并能够在家中康复。回顾性分析,她和心理健康团队都积极评价了CTH的使用。相关各方均认为,与住院治疗相比,CTH对患者自主性的限制较小,不影响治疗关系,CTH可以以不危及参与者安全的方式进行。本病例报告显示,在某些情况下,CTH可以避免住院。尽管如此,仍应谨慎评估其适当性,讨论任何先决条件,并与患者和重要他人对话评估强制治疗的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Reports in Psychiatry
Case Reports in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书