Elvira Anna Carbone, Renato de Filippis, Alessia Scalzo, Emanuela Calabretta, Stefano Lodari, Marianna Rania, Giulia Menculini, Alfonso Antonio Vincenzo Tortorella, Cristina Segura-Garcia, Pasquale De Fazio
{"title":"Depression and apathy: examining an overlooked dimension.","authors":"Elvira Anna Carbone, Renato de Filippis, Alessia Scalzo, Emanuela Calabretta, Stefano Lodari, Marianna Rania, Giulia Menculini, Alfonso Antonio Vincenzo Tortorella, Cristina Segura-Garcia, Pasquale De Fazio","doi":"10.1186/s12991-026-00641-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Apathy is a significant yet frequently overlooked aspect of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), often confused with anhedonia, and with the potential to influence clinical outcomes and quality of life regardless of the severity of depressive symptoms. Despite its importance, the relationship between apathy and depression remains underrepresented in current research. This study aims to assess the prevalence of apathy in a sample of outpatients affected by MDD and to explore its clinical, cognitive, and functional correlates. METHODS: Outpatients with MDD (n = 154) during a clinical stability phase have been assessed using the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician version (AES-C), Dimensional Apathy Scale (I-DAS), MADRS, BDI-II, MMSE, PANSS, EQ-5D-3 L, and CGI-S. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the presence/absence of apathy (AES-C score ≥ 42). Groups comparison and a stepwise logistic regression were run to identify clinical differences between groups and the predictors of apathy. RESULTS: Apathy was detected in 48% of the sample. Patients with apathy scored higher on depression scales, had lower cognitive performance, more negative and general psychopathology, greater clinical severity, and reduced quality of life. Significant differences emerged in initiation and executive apathy. Logistic regression identified MADRS item 8 “inability to feel” and BDI-II item 12 “loss of interest” as the factors showing the strongest association with apathy. CONCLUSION: Apathy is a prevalent and clinically relevant feature in MDD, associated with greater psychopathology and functional impairment. Findings support the need to routinely assess apathy in clinical setting, even during symptomatic stability phases. Specific symptoms may serve as key markers for its identification. </p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13041180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-026-00641-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Apathy is a significant yet frequently overlooked aspect of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), often confused with anhedonia, and with the potential to influence clinical outcomes and quality of life regardless of the severity of depressive symptoms. Despite its importance, the relationship between apathy and depression remains underrepresented in current research. This study aims to assess the prevalence of apathy in a sample of outpatients affected by MDD and to explore its clinical, cognitive, and functional correlates. METHODS: Outpatients with MDD (n = 154) during a clinical stability phase have been assessed using the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician version (AES-C), Dimensional Apathy Scale (I-DAS), MADRS, BDI-II, MMSE, PANSS, EQ-5D-3 L, and CGI-S. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the presence/absence of apathy (AES-C score ≥ 42). Groups comparison and a stepwise logistic regression were run to identify clinical differences between groups and the predictors of apathy. RESULTS: Apathy was detected in 48% of the sample. Patients with apathy scored higher on depression scales, had lower cognitive performance, more negative and general psychopathology, greater clinical severity, and reduced quality of life. Significant differences emerged in initiation and executive apathy. Logistic regression identified MADRS item 8 “inability to feel” and BDI-II item 12 “loss of interest” as the factors showing the strongest association with apathy. CONCLUSION: Apathy is a prevalent and clinically relevant feature in MDD, associated with greater psychopathology and functional impairment. Findings support the need to routinely assess apathy in clinical setting, even during symptomatic stability phases. Specific symptoms may serve as key markers for its identification.
期刊介绍:
Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged.
Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.