Depression and apathy: examining an overlooked dimension.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Elvira Anna Carbone, Renato de Filippis, Alessia Scalzo, Emanuela Calabretta, Stefano Lodari, Marianna Rania, Giulia Menculini, Alfonso Antonio Vincenzo Tortorella, Cristina Segura-Garcia, Pasquale De Fazio
{"title":"Depression and apathy: examining an overlooked dimension.","authors":"Elvira Anna Carbone, Renato de Filippis, Alessia Scalzo, Emanuela Calabretta, Stefano Lodari, Marianna Rania, Giulia Menculini, Alfonso Antonio Vincenzo Tortorella, Cristina Segura-Garcia, Pasquale De Fazio","doi":"10.1186/s12991-026-00641-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Apathy is a significant yet frequently overlooked aspect of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), often confused with anhedonia, and with the potential to influence clinical outcomes and quality of life regardless of the severity of depressive symptoms. Despite its importance, the relationship between apathy and depression remains underrepresented in current research. This study aims to assess the prevalence of apathy in a sample of outpatients affected by MDD and to explore its clinical, cognitive, and functional correlates. METHODS: Outpatients with MDD (n = 154) during a clinical stability phase have been assessed using the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician version (AES-C), Dimensional Apathy Scale (I-DAS), MADRS, BDI-II, MMSE, PANSS, EQ-5D-3 L, and CGI-S. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the presence/absence of apathy (AES-C score ≥ 42). Groups comparison and a stepwise logistic regression were run to identify clinical differences between groups and the predictors of apathy. RESULTS: Apathy was detected in 48% of the sample. Patients with apathy scored higher on depression scales, had lower cognitive performance, more negative and general psychopathology, greater clinical severity, and reduced quality of life. Significant differences emerged in initiation and executive apathy. Logistic regression identified MADRS item 8 “inability to feel” and BDI-II item 12 “loss of interest” as the factors showing the strongest association with apathy. CONCLUSION: Apathy is a prevalent and clinically relevant feature in MDD, associated with greater psychopathology and functional impairment. Findings support the need to routinely assess apathy in clinical setting, even during symptomatic stability phases. Specific symptoms may serve as key markers for its identification. </p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13041180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-026-00641-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Apathy is a significant yet frequently overlooked aspect of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), often confused with anhedonia, and with the potential to influence clinical outcomes and quality of life regardless of the severity of depressive symptoms. Despite its importance, the relationship between apathy and depression remains underrepresented in current research. This study aims to assess the prevalence of apathy in a sample of outpatients affected by MDD and to explore its clinical, cognitive, and functional correlates. METHODS: Outpatients with MDD (n = 154) during a clinical stability phase have been assessed using the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician version (AES-C), Dimensional Apathy Scale (I-DAS), MADRS, BDI-II, MMSE, PANSS, EQ-5D-3 L, and CGI-S. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the presence/absence of apathy (AES-C score ≥ 42). Groups comparison and a stepwise logistic regression were run to identify clinical differences between groups and the predictors of apathy. RESULTS: Apathy was detected in 48% of the sample. Patients with apathy scored higher on depression scales, had lower cognitive performance, more negative and general psychopathology, greater clinical severity, and reduced quality of life. Significant differences emerged in initiation and executive apathy. Logistic regression identified MADRS item 8 “inability to feel” and BDI-II item 12 “loss of interest” as the factors showing the strongest association with apathy. CONCLUSION: Apathy is a prevalent and clinically relevant feature in MDD, associated with greater psychopathology and functional impairment. Findings support the need to routinely assess apathy in clinical setting, even during symptomatic stability phases. Specific symptoms may serve as key markers for its identification.

抑郁和冷漠:审视一个被忽视的维度。
背景:冷漠是重度抑郁症(MDD)的一个重要但经常被忽视的方面,经常与快感缺乏相混淆,并且无论抑郁症状的严重程度如何,都有可能影响临床结果和生活质量。尽管它很重要,但在目前的研究中,冷漠和抑郁之间的关系仍然没有得到充分的体现。本研究旨在评估受重度抑郁症影响的门诊患者中冷漠的患病率,并探讨其临床、认知和功能方面的相关性。方法:采用冷漠量表临床医师版(AES-C)、维度冷漠量表(I-DAS)、MADRS、BDI-II、MMSE、PANSS、eq - 5d - 3l和CGI-S对处于临床稳定期的MDD门诊患者(n = 154)进行评估。根据有无冷漠(AES-C评分≥42)将患者分为两组。通过组间比较和逐步逻辑回归来确定组间临床差异和冷漠的预测因素。结果:48%的样本中检测到冷漠。冷漠患者在抑郁量表上得分较高,认知能力较低,更消极和一般精神病理,临床严重程度更高,生活质量降低。在启动和执行冷漠方面出现了显著差异。Logistic回归发现MADRS项目8“感觉能力”和BDI-II项目12“失去兴趣”是与冷漠表现出最强关联的因素。结论:冷漠是MDD的一个普遍和临床相关特征,与更大的精神病理和功能障碍相关。研究结果支持在临床环境中对冷漠进行常规评估的必要性,即使在症状稳定阶段也是如此。特定症状可作为诊断的关键标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged. Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书